DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

SILAGE FERMENTATION AND SILAGE ADDITIVES - Review -

  • Bolsen, K.K. (Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University) ;
  • Ashbell, G. (Feed Conservation Laboratory, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center) ;
  • Weinberg, Z.G. (Feed Conservation Laboratory, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center)
  • Received : 1995.10.28
  • Accepted : 1996.05.01
  • Published : 1996.10.01

Abstract

Advances in silage technology, including precision chop forage harvesters, improved silos, polyethylene sheeting, shear cutting silo unloaders, and the introduction of total mixed rations, have made silage the principal method of forage preservation. A better understanding of the biochemistry and microbiology of the four phases of the ensiling process has also led to the development of numerous silage additives. Although acids and acid salts still are used to ensile low-DM forages in wet climates, bacterial inoculants have become the most widely used silage additives in the past decade. Commercial inoculants can assure a rapid and efficient fermentation phase; however, in the future, these products also must contribute to other areas of silage management, including the inhibition of enterobacteria, clostridia, and yeasts and molds. Nonprotein nitrogen additives have the problems of handling, application, and reduced preservation efficiency, which have limited their wide spread use. Aerobic deterioration in the feedout phase continues to be a serious problem, especially in high-DM silages. The introduction of competitive strains of propionic acid-producing bacteria, which could assure aerobically stable silages, would improve most commercial additives. New technologies are needed that would allow the farmer to assess the chemical and microbial status of the silage crop on a given day and then use the appropriate additive(s).

Keywords

Cited by

  1. Use of real time PCR to determine population profiles of individual species of lactic acid bacteria in alfalfa silage and stored corn stover vol.71, pp.3, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0170-z
  2. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on tropical-grass silage assessed by ensiling process monitoring using chemical and microbial community analyses pp.13652672, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04591.x
  3. ensiled alone and with additive treatment vol.69, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12036
  4. Potential of Using Maize Cobs in Pig Diets — A Review vol.28, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0053
  5. Temporal and spatial assessment of microbial communities in commercial silages from bunker silos vol.100, pp.15, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7512-x
  6. Adding distiller's grains and molasses on fermentation quality of rice straw silages vol.46, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150851
  7. Advanced green biorefining: effects of ensiling treatments on lactic acid production, microbial activity and supplementary methane formation of grass and rye vol.6, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-015-0178-2
  8. Effects of harvest time and added molasses on nutritional content, ensiling characteristics and in vitro degradation of whole crop wheat vol.31, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0542
  9. Chemical composition, in vitro gas production, methane production and fatty acid profile of canola silage (Brassica napus) with four levels of molasses pp.1573-7438, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01849-7
  10. Chemical Composition, In situ Digestion Kinetics and Feeding Value of Oat Grass (Avena sativa) Ensiled with Molasses for Nili-Ravi Buffaloes vol.19, pp.8, 1996, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1127
  11. Effects of Microbial Inoculants on the Fermentation, Nutrient Retention, and Aerobic Stability of Barley Silage vol.19, pp.10, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1429
  12. Feeding Value of Jambo Grass Silage and Mott Grass Silage for Lactating Nili Buffaloes vol.20, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.523
  13. Influence of Varying Dry Matter and Molasses Levels on Berseem and Lucerne Silage Characteristics and Their In situ Digestion Kinetics in Nili Buffalo Bulls vol.20, pp.6, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.887
  14. The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization to the Sward on Guineagrass (Panicum maximum Jacq cv. Gatton) Silage Fermentation vol.24, pp.3, 1996, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10191
  15. Fermentation Quality and Additives: A Case of Rice Straw Silage vol.2016, pp.None, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7985167
  16. Complete Genome Sequence of Lanthionine-Producing Lactobacillus brevis Strain 100D8, Generated by PacBio Sequencing vol.7, pp.14, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1128/mra.01220-18
  17. Response of common silage corn hybrids to inoculant application: fermentation profile, carbohydrate fractions, and digestibility during ensiling vol.59, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1071/an16840
  18. Environmental Assessment of a Bio-Refinery Concept Comprising Biogas Production, Lactic Acid Extraction and Plant Nutrient Recovery vol.11, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092601
  19. Effects of holes in plastic film on the storage losses in total mixed ration silage in round bales vol.3, pp.4, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz132
  20. Dynamics of fungal community during silage fermentation of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) produced in northern Vietnam vol.32, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0708
  21. Ensilability of Biomass From Effloresced Flower Strips as Co-substrate in Bioenergy Production vol.8, pp.None, 1996, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00014
  22. Chemical composition, and in vitro fermentation of ripe mango silage with molasses vol.94, pp.4, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00442-z
  23. Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria Treatment on Nutritive Value and In Vitro Ruminal Fermentation of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) Silage vol.40, pp.3, 1996, https://doi.org/10.5333/kgfs.2020.40.3.182
  24. Effect of maturity and storage duration on plantain (Plantago lanceolata) silage quality vol.306, pp.None, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130601039
  25. Effect of different double-sided plastic films on chemical and fermentation characteristics of corn silage vol.22, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v22e-66770
  26. A Multi-Sensor Mini-Bioreactor to Preselect Silage Inoculants by Tracking Metabolic Activity in situ During Fermentation vol.12, pp.None, 1996, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.673795
  27. The Potential Effects on Microbiota and Silage Fermentation of Alfalfa Under Salt Stress vol.12, pp.None, 1996, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.688695
  28. Effects of Sugar Cane Molasses Addition on the Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community, and Tastes of Alfalfa Silage vol.11, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020355
  29. Silage Fermentation on Sweet Sorghum Whole Plant for Fen-Flavor Baijiu vol.10, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071477
  30. Assessment of veterinary antibiotics from animal manure-amended soil to growing alfalfa, alfalfa silage, and milk vol.224, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112699
  31. Dual sensor measurement shows that temperature outperforms pH as an early sign of aerobic deterioration in maize silage vol.11, pp.1, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88082-1
  32. Production of high-quality silage from invasive plants plus agro-industrial by-products with or without bacterial inoculation vol.39, pp.None, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102251