DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

INFLUENCE OF DRIED Sacillus subtilis AND LACTOBACILLI CULTURES ON INTESTINAL MICROFLORA AND PERFORMANCE IN BROILERS

  • Jin, L.Z. (Department of Animal Science, University Pertanian Malaysia) ;
  • Ho, Y.W. (Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies, University Pertanian Malaysia) ;
  • Abdullah, N. (Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology University Pertanian Malaysia) ;
  • Jalaudin, S. (Department of Animal Science, University Pertanian Malaysia)
  • Received : 1995.09.28
  • Accepted : 1996.02.12
  • Published : 1996.08.01

Abstract

Two hundred 10-day-lid, male Arbor Acres broiler chicks divided randomly into 4 groups of 50 chicks each were used. Different feeding treatment was carried out for each group. Chicks in treatment 1 were fed a basal diet(Starter feed)(control); treatment 2, a basal diet + 0.1% B. subtilis culture; treatment 3, a basal diet + 0.2% lactobacilli culture in the feed; and treatment 4, a basal diet + 5 g lactobacilli in the drinking water. The viable bacterial counts for each treatment were approximately $10^9cells/kg$ feed. The weight gain in chickens given feeds incorporated with B. subtilis and lactobacilli was significantly(p < 0.05) higher than those of the control. With regard to feed efficiency, there was a definite tendency towards a higher feed : gain lower(p < 0.05) feed : gain ratio. A significantly(p < 0.05) larger population of Lactobacillus was found in the small intestine of chickens fed with feed incorporated with B. subtilis at 21 and 28 days and with lactobacilli at 14, 21 and 28 days. Populations of intestinal E. coli in broilers given feed added with B. subtilis were not significantly(p < 0.05) different from those of the control, but in chickens fed lactobacilli-added feed, their populations wee significantly lower(p < 0.05) at 14 and 21 days. No significant differences were found among the treatments and the control in the occurrence of Salmonella and Campylobacter during the whole experimental period.

Keywords

Cited by

  1. Efeito de antibiótico e probióticos sobre o desempenho e rendimento de carcaça de frangos de corte vol.55, pp.4, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352003000400013
  2. Effects of diets containing different concentrations of mannanoligosaccharide or antibiotics on growth performance, intestinal development, cecal and litter microbial populations, and carcass parameters of broilers vol.88, pp.11, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00562
  3. Diferentes vias de administração de probiótico sobre o desempenho, o rendimento de carcaça e a população microbiana do intestino delgado de codornas de corte vol.39, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000100021
  4. Effect of dietary supplementation of probiotic on the performance of F1 crossbred (Rhode Island red male × Fayoumi female) cockerels vol.95, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01079.x
  5. Effect of Different Concentrations of Bacillus subtilis on Immune Response of Broiler Chickens vol.3, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-011-9063-x
  6. A Comparison of Feeding Multi-Probiotics and Fermented Ginseng Byproducts on Performance, Intestinal Microflora and Immunity of Broiler Chicks vol.39, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2012.39.4.253
  7. A multi-microbe probiotic formulation processed at low and high drying temperatures: effects on growth performance, nutrient retention and caecal microbiology of broilers vol.53, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.690508
  8. Effect of Bacillus subtilis natto on growth performance in Muscovy ducks vol.15, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2013000300004
  9. Control strategies for Campylobacter infection in poultry production vol.69, pp.01, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933913000068
  10. by-products fermented with multistrain probiotics on growth performance, immunity, caecal microbiology and meat oxidative stability in broilers vol.55, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.938021
  11. Population, production and improvement of local fowl of southern Nigeria ecotype vol.10, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR12.2047
  12. CGMCC 1.1086 on the growth performance and intestinal microbiota of broilers vol.120, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12972
  13. ) and palm kernel expeller as mannan-oligosac-charides sources on the performance and ileal microbial population of broiler chickens vol.14, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2015.3452
  14. Effects of a Lactobacillus salivarius mixture on performance, intestinal health and serum lipids of broiler chickens vol.12, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175959
  15. Performance, biochemical and haematological responses, and relative organ weights of laying hens fed diets supplemented with prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic vol.13, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1160-y
  16. Assessing the effect of administering different probiotics in drinking water supplement on broiler performance, blood biochemistry and immune response vol.39, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2011.623783
  17. Effects of Bacillus subtilis var. natto and Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermented liquid feed on growth performance, relative organ weight, intestinal microflora, and organ antioxidant status in Landes geese1 vol.91, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5148
  18. The Effects of a Synbiotic Containing Enterococcus faecium and Inulin on Growth Performance and Resistance to Coccidiosis in Broiler Chickens vol.47, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.009065
  19. Probiotics in poultry: modes of action vol.53, pp.4, 1997, https://doi.org/10.1079/wps19970028
  20. Effect of lactobacillus supplementation on growth and nutrient utilization in Mongrel pups vol.55, pp.3, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390109386195
  21. Intestinal Immunomodulation by Vitamin A Deficiency and Lactobacillus-Based Probiotic in Eimeria acervulina-Infected Broiler Chickens vol.47, pp.4, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1637/6079
  22. 생균제, 일라이트, 활성탄 및 목초액의 첨가가 육성-비육돈의 생산성과 지방산 조성에 미치는 영향 vol.27, pp.1, 1996, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2007.27.1.60
  23. 사료내 생균제, 일라이트, 활성탄 및 목초액의 첨가가 육계의 성장 능력 및 도체 특성에 미치는 영향 vol.34, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2007.34.3.165
  24. Growth Performance and Antibody Response of Broiler Chicks Fed Yeast Derived β-Glucan and Single-strain Probiotics vol.21, pp.7, 1996, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70571
  25. 효모변이균주 유래 β-글루칸과 복합균종 생균제의 혼합급여가 육계의 생산성 및 장내 균총에 미치는 영향 vol.50, pp.1, 1996, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2008.50.1.089
  26. 유산균의 급여가 육계 생산성, 장내 미생물 균총, 회장 융모 발달 및 장점막에 미치는 영향 vol.50, pp.5, 1996, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2008.50.5.667
  27. 사료내 생균제, 일라이트, 활성탄 및 목초액의 첨가가 닭 다리육의 품질 및 저장성에 미치는 영향 vol.28, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2008.28.4.480
  28. 육계에 대한 유산균의 장내 생존성 및 적정 급여방법에 대한 연구 vol.50, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2008.50.6.807
  29. 초기 비육돈에서 생균제 첨가 급여가 생산성, 영양소 소화율, 분내 Lactobacillus와 Escherichia coli 농도, 분으로부터의 유해가스 발생량 및 혈중 혈액세포 농도에 미치는 영향 vol.52, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2010.52.1.023
  30. 혼합 또는 단일 생균제가 산란계와 육계의 생산성, 소장내 미생물 균총 및 면역 체계에 미치는 영향 vol.37, pp.1, 1996, https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2010.37.1.051
  31. 복합생균제와 항생제 급여가 육계의 생산성 및 육질에 미치는 영향 vol.30, pp.3, 1996, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.3.504
  32. Effect of different concentrations ofBacillus subtilison growth performance, carcase quality, gut microflora and immune response of broiler chickens vol.52, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2011.636029
  33. The effect of probiotic supplementation on the growth performance, blood biochemistry and immune response of reciprocal F1 crossbred (Rhode Island Red×Fayoumi) cockerels vol.41, pp.4, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2013.792732
  34. 김치 유래의 유산균 변이주 Lactobacillus paracasei ML-7의 특성 및 육계 성장에 대한 영향 vol.46, pp.2, 1996, https://doi.org/10.9721/kjfst.2014.46.2.148
  35. 유용 미생물 첨가가 육계 생산성, 맹장 내 균총 및 유해가스 발생량에 미치는 영향 vol.41, pp.4, 1996, https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2014.41.4.227
  36. Effect of microencapsulated Bacillus subtilis strain CBD2-fermented grain on loperamide-induced constipation in mice vol.59, pp.3, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-016-0182-7
  37. Dietary supplementation with avilamycin and Lactobacillus acidophilus effects growth performance and the expression of growth-related genes in broilers vol.60, pp.14, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1071/an19030
  38. Effect of dietary direct-fed microbial and yeast cell walls on cecal digesta microbiota of layer chicks inoculated with nalidixic acid resistant Salmonella Enteritidis vol.100, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101385