도시 저소득층 고령 주민의 구강건강실태

Oral Health Status of Needy Old Residents in Urban Area

도시 고령 영세민들의 구강건강을 증진하기 위한 구강보건진료사업을 개발하는 데에 기초자료를 마련할 목적으로, 부산광역시 해운대구 운봉영구임대아파트 단지 주민들 중 44세이상의 인구를 대상으로 구강건강행동과 구강건강실태를 조사분석 검토한 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 1일 잇솔질횟수는 44-54세에서 1,9회, 55-64세에서 1.7회, 65세이상에서 1.7회이었고, 식후 잇솔질률은 44-54세에서 73.7%, 55-64세에서 식후 잇솔질률은 70.6%, 65세이상에서 식후 잇솔질률은 76.5%이었다. 2. 우식경험영구치지수는 44-54세에서 15.5개, 55-64세에서 16.4개, 65세이상에서 26.6개이었다. 3. 우식영구치율은 44-54세에서 23.9%, 55-65세에서 11.6%, 65세이상에서는 11.7%이었고, 상실영구치율은 44-54세에서 55.5%, 55-65세에서 62.8%, 65세이상에서는 77.4%이었으며, 처치영구치율은 44-54세에서 20.0%, 55-65세에서 25.0%, 65세이상에서는 10.9%이었다. 4. 건전영구치수는 44-54세에서 16.4개, 55-64세에서 15.6개, 65세이상에서 5.4개이었고, 현존영구치수는 44-54세에서 23.7개, 55-64세에서 21.6개, 65세이상에서 10.9개이었다. 5. 치면세마필요자율은 44-54세에서 75.0%, 55-64세에서 83.3%, 65세이상에서 76.9%이었으며, 복합치주병치료 필요자율은 44-54세에서 16.7%, 55-64세에서 13.3%, 65세이상에서 15.4%이었다. 6. 치면세마 필요분악률은 44-54세에서 59.3%, 55-64세에서 71.5%, 65세이상에서 71.5%이었으며, 복합치주병치료 필요분악를은 44-54세에서 5.6%, 55-64세에서 4.1%, 65세이상에서 5.7%이었다. 7. 도시 저소득층 고령 주민들의 구강건강향상을 위해서 체계적이고 포괄적인 구강보건진료사업을 개발하여야 한다.

The oral health status and practices related to oral health among 44-54-year-, 55-64-year- and 65-year-old needy residents were assessed. The subjects were the residents at the Unbong Permanent Rental Apartment, Bansong-dong, Haeundae-gu. Pusan, Korea. An oral epidemiological survey was undertaken to determine the status of dental caries and periodontal health. Periodontal health were analyzed by the tool of CPITN (Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs). A questionnaire was used to interview for the practices of toothbrushing. The numbers of subjects were 192 for the interview on toothbrushing, 228 for the survey of dental status and 208 for the survey of periodontal status. The major results were as follows: 1. Toothbrushing frequencies per day were 1.9 among 44-54-year-, 1.7 among 55-64-year- and 1.7 among 65+-year-subjects. Percentages of after-meal-toothbrushings among total brushing frequencies per day were 73.7% among 44-54-year-, 70.6% among 55-64-year- and 76.5% among 65+-year-subjects. 2. DMFT indices were 15.5 among 44-54-year-, 16.4 among 55-64-year- and 26.6 among 65-year-subjects. Decayed teeth component of DMF teeth were 23.9% among 44-54-year-, 11.6% among 55-64-year- and 62.8% among 65+-year-subjects. Missed teeth component of DMF teeth were 55.59% among 44-54-year-, 62.8% among 55-64-year- and 77.4% among 65+-year-subjects. Filled teeth component of DMF teeth were 20.0% among 44-54-year-, 25.0% among 55-64-year- and 10.9% among 65+-year-subjects. 3. Sound permanent teeth were 16.4 among 44-54-year-, 15.6 among 55-64-year- and 5.4 among 65+-year-subjects. Present permanent teeth were 23.7 among 44-54-year-, 21.6 among 55-64-year- and 10.9 among 65-year-subjects. 4. Subjects who needed professional oral prophylaxis were 75.0% among 44-54-year-, 83.3% among 55-64-year-and 76.9% among 65-year-subjects. Subjects who needed complex periodontal treatments were 16.7% among 44-54-year-, 13.3% among 55-64-year- and 15.4% among 65+-year-subjects. 5. Sextants which needed professional oral prophylaxis were 59.3% among 44-54-year-, 71.5% among 55-64-year- and 71.5% among 65+-year-subjects. Sextants which needed complex periodontal treatments were 5.6% among 44-54-year-, 4.1% among 55-64-year- and 5.7% among 65+-year-subjects. 6. Systematic comprehensive oral health care services should be developed for old needy residents in urban area.