물과 미래 (Water for future)

한국수자원학회 (Korea Water Resources Association)
권호 표지

에너지와 물수지 연계방법과 TDR로부터 얻어진 매일 토양 함수량의 비교

Comparison of Daily Soil Water Contents between Energy BalanceWater Budget Approach and TDR

  • 임창수 (한국수자원공사 수자원연구소)
  • 발행 : 1996.08.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

여름기간 동안 두 다른 준건조 기지역에 위치한 소유역들(Lucky Hills 그리고 Kendall)로부터 eddy 상관을 기초로 한 에너지 수지와 물수지 방법 그리고 TDR 방법을 이용하여 매일의 토양 함수량이 측정되어졌으며, 그 두 다른 방법들로부터 측정되어지고 계산되어진 매일의 토양 함수량에 대한 비교가 있었다. 그 비교는 유역을 대상으로 하는 경우에 있어서 eddy상관을 이용한 에너지 수지와 물수지 방법 그리고 TDR 방법을 사용한 토양 함수량 특정 방법에 대한 정확돌알아보는데 유용하다. 토양 함수량을 측정하는 이 두 방법들로부터 구해진 회귀 사이의 유사도는 이 방법들 사이의 상관 정도를 알아보는 것에 의해서 설명되어졌다. 단순선형상관분석은 Lucky Hills 유역에서는 TDR 방법에 의해서 측정된 토양 함수량이 에너지와 물수지 방법에 의해서 측정된 토양 함수량의 58% 정도임을 나타냈고, 그리고 Kendall 유역에서는 63% 정도임을 나타내었다. 분포도와 상관분석 결과는, 소유역에서 토양 함수량 측정을 위한 두 방법들에 있어서 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다.

The daily soil water contents were obtained from the time domain reflectometry (TDR) method and energy balance-water budget approach with eddy correlation at the two small semiarid watersheds of Lucky Hills and Kendall during the summer rainy period. There was a comparison of daily soil water content measured and estimated from these two different approaches. The comparison is valuable to evaluate the accuracy of current soil water content measuring system using TDR and energy balance-water budget approach using eddy correlation method at small watersheed scale. The degree of similarity between the regressions of these two methods of measuring soil water content was explained by determining the correlations between these methods. Simple linear regression analyses showed that soil water content measured from TDR method was responsible for 58% and 63% of the variations estimated from energy balance-water budget approach with eddy correlation at Lucky Hills and Kendall, respectively. The scatter plots and the regression analyses revealed that two different approaches for soil water content measurement at small watershed scale have no significant difference.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Proc. Special Session on Hydrometeorology, Am. Meteorol. Soc. Spatial variability of energy fluxes at Walnut Gulch Blanford, J.H.;Stannard, D.I.
  2. Theor. Appl. Climatol. v.46 Tests of a robust eddy correlation system for sensible heat flux Blanford, J.H.;Gay, L.W.
  3. J. Appl. Meteorol. v.6 On the direct determination of the turbulent heat flux near the ground Businger, J.A.;Miyake, M.;Dyer, A.J.;Bradley, E.F.
  4. M.S. thesis, The University of Arizona Sensitivity of runoff to small scale spatial variability of observed rainfall in a distributed model Faures, J.M.
  5. Water Resour. Res. v.30 no.5 Runoff simulation sensitivity to remotely sensed initial soil water content Goodrich, D.C.;Schmugge, T.J.;Jackson, T.J.;Unkrich, C.L.;Keefer, T.O.;Parry, R.;Bach, L.B.;Amer, S.A.
  6. J. Hydrol. v.102 Effect of initial soil moisture content on the vertical infiltration process-A guide to the problem of runoff ratio and loss Hino, M.;Odaka, Y.;Nadaoka, K.;Sato, A.
  7. J. Hyd. Div. v.88 Transmission losses in ephemeral stream beds Keppel, R.V.;Renard, K.G.
  8. Bull. IASH v.65 Soil and vegetation parametrers affecting infiltration under semiarid conditions Kincaid, D.R.;Gardner, J.L.;Schreiber, H.A.
  9. Am. Meteorol. Soc. Bull. v.72 no.11 An interdisciplinary field study of the energy and water fluxes in the atmosphere-biosphere system over semiarid rangelands : description andsome preliminary results Kustas, W.P.;Goodrich, D.C.;Moran, M.S.;Amer, S.A.;Bach, L.B.;Blanford, J.H.;Chehbouni, A.;Claassen, H.;Clements, W.E.;Doraiswamy, P.G.;Dubois, P.;Clarke, T.R.;Daughtry, C.S.T.;Gellman, D.I.;Grant, T.A.;Hipps, L.E.;Huete, A.R.;Humes, K.S.;Jackson, T.J.;Keefer, T.O.;Nichols, W.D.;Parry, R.;Perry, E.M.;Pinker, R.T.;Pinter, P.J., Jr.;Qi, J.;Riggs, A.C.;Schmugge, T.J.;Shutko, A.M.;Stannard, D.I.;Swiat다, E.;Van Leeuwen, J.D.;Van Zyl, J.;Vidal, A.;Washburne, J.;Weltz, M.A.
  10. Hydrol. Water Resour. Ariz. Southwest v.13 Water balance calculations, water use efficiency, and above-ground net production Lane, L.J.;Stone, J.J.
  11. J. Range Man. v.114 Water balance calculations and net production of perennial-vegetation in the Northern Mojave desert Lane, L.J.;Romney, E.M.;Hakonson, T.E.
  12. Water Resour. Res. v.21 no.2 A comparison of rainfall-runoff modeling techniques on small upland watersheds Loague, K.M.;Freeze, R.A.
  13. Water Resources Res. v.5 no.2 Prediction-runoff relation of very small semiarid rangeland watersheds Osborn, H.B.;Lane, L.J.
  14. Hydrol. Sci. Tech. v.9 no.1-4 Agricultural impacts in an arid environment : Walnut Gulch studies Renard, K.G.;Lane, L.J.;Simanton, W.E.;Emmerich, W.E.;Stone, J.J.;Weltz, M.A.;Goodrich, D.C.;Yakowitz, D.S.
  15. Tech. Bull. 1655 Supercritical flow flumes for measuring sediment-laden flow Smith, R.E.;Chery, D.L.;Renard, K.G.;Gwinn, W.R.
  16. Water : The year book of agriculture USDA