The Evaluation of Mechanical Properties for Alumina Ceramics

알루미나 세라믹스의 기계적 특성 평가

  • Published : 1996.03.01

Abstract

Mechanical properties(flexural strength hardness fracture toughness) of alumina ceramics were evaluated. Alumina products of four companies were selected and three of those were made in Korea and one of those was made in Japan. The large differences according to manufacturing companies had resulted from flexural strength and weibull modulus which had a wide ranges of 300 to 400 MPa and 5 to 15 respectively. Critical indenstation load which could be neglected the effect of elastic recovery was about 9.8N and Vickers' hardness were about 15 GPa. Fracture toughnesses were evaluated by IF and ISB method. It was more preferable to the average at one indentation load that fracture toughness were obtained from the slope of the relationship between indentation load and crack length in IF method and between indentation load and fracture load in ISB method and fracture toughness was about 4 MPa·m1/2.

알루미나를 대상소재로 하여 국산 3종 및 일산 1종의 고순도 알루미나 제품을 구입하여 꺾임강도, 비커스 경도, 압자압입법 및 압입강도법에 의한 파괴인성 등의 기계적 물성을 평가하였다. 꺾임강도 및 와이블 계수는 제조회사에 따라 각각 약 300~400MPa, 5~15의 범위에서 큰 편차를 나타내었다. 압입하중 변화에 따른 경도시험시 탄성회복의 영향을 무시할 수 있는 임계하중은 약 9.8N이었으며, 압입하중 98N에서의 알루미나의 경도는 약 15GPa이었다. 파괴인성은 한 압입하중에서의 측정한 평균값으로 파괴인성을 구하는 것보다 압자압입법의 경우 압입하중과 균열길이, 압입강도법의 경우 압입하중과 꺾임강도와 관계식의 기울기로부터 각각 직선회기법으로 파괴인성을 구하는 것이 보다 신뢰성이 있으며, 알루미나의 파괴인성은 약 4 MPa·m1/2이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. International Conference on the Promotion of Standardization for Fine Ceramics Standars Need in Advanced Ceramics D. Pearl
  2. International Conference on the Promotion of Standardization Fine Ceramics Synergy Effects of Standardization in High-Tech Industry M. Uenohara
  3. Designing with Structural Ceramics Perspectives of Structural Ceramics and Present R and D Efforts M.H. Voorde;R.W. Davidge(ed.);M.H. Voorde(ed.)
  4. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. v.64 no.12 Mechanical Properties of Engineering Ceramics H. Abe
  5. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. v.67 no.2 Brittle Fracture Behavior of Ceramics S.W. Freiman
  6. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. What the Designer with Ceramics Needs D.L. Hartsock;A.F. McLean
  7. 한국공업규격 KSL 1591 고성능 요업제품의 굽힘강도 시험방법 한국공업표준협회
  8. 한국공업규격 KSL 1603 고성능 요업제품의 비커스경도 시험방법 한국공업표준협회
  9. 한국공업규격 KSL 1600 고성능 요업제품의 파괴인성 시험방법 한국공업표준협회
  10. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. v.63 no.9-10 Elastic/Plastic Indentation Damage in Ceramics: The Median/Radial Crack System B.R. Lawn;A.G. Evans;D.B. Marshall
  11. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. v.59 no.7-8 Fracture Toughness Determinations by Indentation A.G. Evans;E.A. Charles
  12. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. v.64 no.9 A Critical Evaluation of Indentation Techniques for Measuring Fracture Toughness:Ⅱ, Strength Method P. Chantikul;G.R. Antis;B.R. Lawn;D.B. Marshall
  13. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. v.74 no.9 Design Data for Engineering Ceramics: A Review of the Flexure Test G.D. Quinn;R. Morrell
  14. Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics v.1 Fractographic Identification fo Strength Controlling Flaws and Microstructure R.W. Rice;R.C. Bradt(ed.);D.P.H. Hasselman(ed.);F.F. Lange(ed.)
  15. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. v.66 no.6 Processing-Related Fracture Origins: Ⅱ, Agglomerate Motion and Cracklike Internal Surfaces Caused by Differential Sintering F.F. Lange;M. Metcalf
  16. Ceramic Hardness Introduction and Overview J.J. McColm
  17. セラミソソク矢端材料 破壞力學 特性 日本セラミツクス協會
  18. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. v.68 no.11 Microstructure-Strength Properties in Ceramics: Ⅰ, Effect of Crack Size on Toughness R.F. Cook;B.R. Lawn;C.J. Fairbanks
  19. Acta metall. v.36 no.3 Fracture Stability, R-Curves and Strength Variability R.F. Cook;D.R. Clarke
  20. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. v.71 no.5 Rising Fracture Toughness from the Bending Strength of Indented Alumina Beams R.F. Krause Jr.
  21. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. v.73 no.2 Perspective on the Development of High-Toughness Ceramics A.G. Evans
  22. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. v.65 no.11 Dependence of Fracture Toughness of Alumina on Grain Size and Test Technique B. Mussler;M.V. Swain;N. Claussen