Comparison of Continuous Epidural Infusion of Narcotic Analgesics and Local Anesthetics Using 2-day Infusor and Meperidine IM. on Postoperative Analgesia

2-day Infusor를 이용한 마약성 진통제와 국소마취제의 지속적인 경막외 투여와 Meperidine근주와의 통증 치료 비교

  • Kim, Joung-Sung (Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Chang (Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kang, Po-Sun (Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Ye-Choul (Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Konkuk University)
  • 김정성 (건국대학교 의과대학 마취과학교실) ;
  • 이규창 (건국대학교 의과대학 마취과학교실) ;
  • 강포순 (건국대학교 의과대학 마취과학교실) ;
  • 이예철 (건국대학교 의과대학 마취과학교실)
  • Published : 1995.11.25

Abstract

Recently, continuous epidural infusion of narcotics and local anesthetics have been used for postoperative pain relief. This study was designed to compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of continuous epidural infusion of narcotics and local anesthetics with those of intramuscular administration of meperidine, for postoperative pain relief after cesarean section. Forty patients were divided into 2 groups of 20 patients each ; Continuous epidural group and control (IM meperidine) group. Before each operation, the epidural group had an epidural catheter placed (L1-2) and following each operation, a bolus of 1%~8ml of lidocaine was injected, followed by continuous infusion of morphine 3 mg/day, fentanyl 300g, 2% mepivacaine 20 ml, 0.5% bupivacaine 20 ml and normal saline 40 ml. The control group received meperidine 50mg IM injection as needed. We evaluated analgesic efficacy with VAS (Visual analogue scale) and side effect at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hour intervals after the operation. The results were as follows: 1) Continuous epidural group was superior to the control group with respect to postoperative analgesia. 2) Side effects (pruritus, nausea & vomiting) were more frequent in the epidural group.

Keywords