A Study on the Aesthetic Preference for Rural Landscapes: urban and rural resident differences

도시 및 농촌거주자의 농촌경관선호도에 관한 연구

  • Published : 1995.07.01

Abstract

The changes of rural landscape are currently spread everywhere and are rapidily being processed both in quality and in quantities of changes From such aspects, it is urgent to control the land scape change, and is required to know what is valued or preferred in rural landscape, This study was conducted to investigate preferences and differences of the responses between urban and rural residents to rural scenery. As a method, color-slide surrogates for rural landscape settings are shown to urban and rural residents, For a given 52 scenes of rural landscapes the respondents judged the familiarity, orality, and preference along a ten point scale. The following facts are found: 1) Refponses to certain types of landscape settings are influenced by the place of residence of the respondents. The urban residents highly rated natural components of the rural landscape. In contrast rural residents preferred the scenes with visible sign of development 2) The relations among the estimation of preference, familiarity and rurality in rural landscape were deeply correlated. When the rural lands(:ape is adequately ref resented as 'familiarity' or 'rurality' well the landscape is more preferred 3) It is found what is valued or preferred in rural landscape : Readjusted agricultural land, big tree, grassland hi dominated visually were preferred in rural landscape. The implication of this study is that successful planning of development or management in rural area will occur only when these different needs and values are acknowledged and accommodated.

Keywords

References

  1. 한국조경학회지 v.17 no.3 경관선호도의 인지인자에 관한 연구 양병이
  2. 한국조경학회지 v.20 no.3 경관의 미학적 경험에 있어서 감정과 인지의 상호작용 이영경
  3. 한국조경학회지 v.15 no.2 시각적 질의 계량적 측정기법에 관한 연구:SBE기법의 일반화 임승빈
  4. 경관분석론 임승빈
  5. 도시정보 v.6 농촌지역종합개발론의 패러다임 최양부
  6. Environment and Behavior v.17 no.2 The Reliability of Ratings of the Familiarity of environmental Stimuli:A Generalizability Analysis Charmers,D.J.;R.G.Knight
  7. Landscape Planning v.11 Factors Influencing Landscape Preferences:An Empirical Investigation Deaden,P.
  8. Journal of Environmental Psychology v.12 Validity of photobased scenic beauty judgments Hull IV,R.B.;W.P.Stewart
  9. Landscape Planning v.12 The analysis of perception via preference:A strategy for studying how the environment in experienced Kaplan,R.
  10. Environmental aesthetics Familiarity and preference:a cross-cultural analysis Kaplan,R.;E.J.Herbert;Jack L,Nasal(ed.)
  11. 造園雜誌 v.56 no.5 岡山??山地城におけゐ 景觀計劃と地城住民の景觀 認識 構造についで 魔生惠;?江?郞
  12. 造園雜誌 v.52 no.3 農村景觀とアィニテイ 楠本侑司
  13. Environmental aesthetics Aesthetic preference for rural landscape some resident and visitor differences Orland,B.
  14. Landscape Planning v.7 Contribution to reflections on rural landscapes Perelman,R.
  15. Environment and Behavior v.9 no.1 Psychological reward values associated with wilderness use a functional-reinforcement approach Rossman,B.B.;Z.J.Ulehla
  16. Journal of Environmental Management v.11 The Use of photographs as an environment presentation medium in landscape studies Shuttleworth,S.
  17. Landscape and Urban Planning v.13 The influence of the environmental background of subjects on their landscape preference evaluation Tips,W.E.J.;T.Savasdisara