한국조경학회지 (Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)

  • 제23권2호
  • /
  • Pages.1-16
  • /
  • 1995
  • /
  • 1225-1755(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9566(eISSN)
한국조경학회 (The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)
권호 표지

주제공원의 경쟁력 제고 방안에 관한 연구: Hybrid Conjoint Analysis의 적용

Application of Hybrid Conjoint Analysis to Improve Competitive Power of Theme Parks in Seoul and Its Suburbs

  • 홍성권 (건국대학교 농과대학 원예과학과)
  • 발행 : 1995.07.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was carried out to suggest method which can be used to improve competitive power of theme parks. The characteristics of Hybrid Conjoint Analysis were described and its usefulness for identification of specific types of service theme parks have to provide was tested "Lotte World, " "Seoul land," and "farmland" were selected as study areas, and .7 attributes with 3 levels were utilized for analyses. Master design with 81 profiles was constructed to meet the requirement of ′Compromise Plan 1,′and data was collected by in-personal interviews on the study areas. Respondents were grouped by cluster analysis, and their characteristics were analyzed by discriminant analysis. Then, part-worth of each attribute . was estimated by stagewise estimation model Calibrated model of each group did not show part-worths of attributes clearly because both main effects and 2-way interaction effects were included in the models. Therefore, calibrated models′ coefficients were used to calculate utilities of all possible combinations of attributes levels. The results showed that managers of theme parks have several options for providing a new service: the combination of attribute levels with the highest utility is they however, they can choose the other combinations with next highest utlities is they can not afford it. Several suggestions were described to cope with the problems when Hybrid Conjoint Analysis is applied to landscape architectural study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 국민체육진흥공단 한강조정;카누경기장 개발기본계획 국민체육진흥공단
  2. 韓國造景學會誌 v.22 no.2 主題公園 서비스質의 測定 尺度 開發에 關한 硏究 嚴瑞浩
  3. 디벨로퍼 no.7월;8월 주제공원의 월별 입장개수 추이분석과 마케팅 측면의 시사점 嚴瑞浩
  4. 롯데월드 베스트팀 no.4월 지속적인 경쟁우위 확보를 위한 세가지 제안 嚴瑞浩
  5. 현대의 마케팅과학 유필화
  6. 京畿大學校 觀光開發學科 碩士學位論文 主題公園의 포지셔닝에 관한 硏究;多次元尺度法 適用을 中心으로 鄭必?
  7. 韓國造景學會誌 v.22 no.3 서울市內와 近郊에 위치한 當日餘暇用 Recreation 施設의 選擇行動 推定 에 關한 硏九: Generalized Logit Model의 適用 洪性權
  8. 韓國造景學會誌 v.22 no.2 當日餘暇用 Recreation施設의 포지셔닝에 關한 硏究:서울市를 중심으로 洪性權
  9. 韓國造景學會誌 v.20 no.2 都市公園의 市場分割에 關한 硏究 洪性權
  10. Journal of Marketing Research v.17 Evaluation of conjoint analysis results: A comparison of methods Acito,Franklin;Jain,Arun K.
  11. Technometrics v.4 no.1 Orthogonal main effect plans for asymmetrical factorial experiments Addelman,Sidney
  12. Technometrics v.4 no.1 Symmetrical and asymmetrical fractional factorial plans Addelman,Sidney
  13. Journal of Marketing Research v.10 A comparative analysis of attitudinal predictions of brand preference Bass,Frank M.;Wilkie,William L.
  14. Journal of Marketing Reaearch v.12 The importance of halo effects in multiattribute attitude models Beckwith,N.;Lehmann,D.
  15. Leisure Sciences v.12 no.1 Price bundling in public recreation Bojanic,David C.;Calantone,Roger J.
  16. Communications in Statistics v.3 no.1 A dendrite method for cluster analysis Calinski,T.;Harabasz J.
  17. Journal of Marketing Research v.18 no.1 Model misspecification in multiattribute parameter estimation Carmone,Frank J.;Green,Paul E.
  18. Journal of Marketing Research v.15 Robustness of conjoint analysis: Some Mont Carlo results Carmone,Frank J.;Green;Paul E.;Jain,Arun K.
  19. Journal of Marketing v.46 no.Summer Commercial use of conjoint analysis: A survey Cattin,Philippe;Wittink,Dick R.
  20. Research Management v.22 no.5 New product failure rates facts and fallacies Crawford,Merle C.
  21. Psychological Bulletin v.81 Linear models in decision making Dawes,Robyn M.;Corrigan,Bernard
  22. Attitude,Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research Fishbein,Martine;Ajzen,Icek
  23. Journal of Marketing Research v.21 Hybrid model for conjoint analysis: An expository review Green,Paul E.
  24. Journal of Consumer Research v.1 On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives Green,paul E.
  25. Journal of Marketing v.43 no.Fall Componential segmentation in the analysis of consumer tradeoffs Green,Paul E.;DeSarbo,Wayne S.
  26. Journal of Marketing v.54 Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice Green,Pual E.;Srinivasan,V.
  27. Journal of Consumer Research v.5 Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook Green,Paul E.;Srinivasan,V.
  28. Harvard Business Review v.53 no.4 New way to measure consumers judgments Green,Paul E.;Wind,Yoram
  29. Research in Marketing An Annual Compliation of Research Some new types of fractional factorial designs for marketing experiments Green,Paul E.;Carroll,J.Douglas;Carmone,Frank J.
  30. Journal of Marketing v.45 no.Winter A hybrid utility estimation model for conjoint analysis Green,Paul E.;Goldberg,Stephen M.;Montemayor,Mila
  31. Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference on Perceptual Mapping Conjoint experiments:Analysis and interpretation of results Greenberg,Marshall G.
  32. Journal of Consumer Research v.8 Feature interactions in consumer judgments of verbal bersus pictorial presentations Holbrook,Morris B.;Morre,William L.
  33. Financing,Managing and Marketing Recreation & Park Resource Howard,Dennis R.;Crompton,John L.
  34. Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference on Peroeptual Mapping Conjoint analysis: How we got here and where we are Huber,Joel
  35. Journal of Marketing Research v.11 Trade off analysis of consumer values Johnson,Richard M.
  36. Analysis for Marketing Planning Lehmann,D.;Winer,R.
  37. Journal of Marketing Research v.21 Reliability and validity of conjoint analysis and self explicated weights: A comparison Leigh,Thomas W.;Mackay,David B.;Summers,John O.
  38. Journal of Mathematical Psychology v.1 Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement Luce,R.Duncan;Tukey,John W.
  39. Journal of Leisure Research v.24 no.2 Levels of aggregation in conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison Moore,William L.
  40. Journal of Consumer Research v.6 Consumer decision making Fact or fiction Olshavsky,Richard W.;Granbois,Donald H.
  41. Journal of Consumer Research v.6 Consumer decision making Fact or fiction Olshavsky,Richard W.;Granbois,Donald H.
  42. Competitive Advantage Porter,M.
  43. Decision Sciences v.22 no.2 On the creation of acceptabe conjoint analysis experimental designs Steckel,Joel H.;DeSarbo,Wayne S.;Mahajan,Vijay
  44. Leisure Sciences v.9 no.2 Hybrid and hybrid evaluation models for predicting outdoor recreation behavior: A test of predictive ability Timmerman,Harry
  45. Journal of Leisure Research v.21 no.4 Strategic marketing for recreational facilities: A hybrid conjoint analysis approach Toy,Daniel;Rager,Robin;Guadagnolo,Frank
  46. Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference on Perceptual Mapping How to design a conjoint study Tumbusch,James J.
  47. Journal of Marketing v.53 Commercial use of conjoint analysis Wittink,Dick R.;Cattin,Philippe
  48. Journal of Consumer Research v.8 Comparing derived importance weights across attributes Wittink,Dick R.;Krishnamurthi,Lakshman;Nutter,Julia B.