Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
- 제26권4호
- /
- Pages.574-586
- /
- 1993
- /
- 1975-8375(pISSN)
- /
- 2233-4521(eISSN)
제조업 근로자들의 결근요인 분석
A Study on the Factors of Absenteeism among the Manufacturing Workers
- 이동배 (충남대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
- 이태용 (충남대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
- 조영채 (충남대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
- 이영수 (충남대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
- 오장균 (충남대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
- 박암 (충남대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
- Lee, Dong-Bae (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
- Lee, Tae-Yong (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
- Cho, Young-Chae (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
- Lee, Young-Soo (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
- Oh, Jang-Kyun (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
- Park, Am (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University)
- 발행 : 1993.12.01
초록
산업장 근로자들의 결근실태와 요인을 알아보기 위해 대전시내에 위치한 제조업에 종사하는 근로자 1,184명을 대상으로 1992년 6월에서 8월 사이의 3개월간 결근양상에 대한 조사에서 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 조사대상자의 총결근자율은 20.1%, 질병결근자율은 6.9% 였으며 총결근율은 1.2%, 질병 결근율은 0.5%로 나타났다. 2. 결근자의 평균결근일수는 2.8일이었으며 이중 질병으로 인한 경우가 4.4일, 질병이 아닌 원인으로 인한 경우는 1.4일로 나타났다. 원인별 질병결근의 평균결근일수는 두부, 사지, 체간의 상해로 인한 경우가
This study was to examine the actual conditions and contributing factors of absenteeism in manufacturing workers. Subjects were 1,184 workers employed in Taejon city and the observation period for absenteeism was 3 months (June to August), 1992. We obtained the following results. 1. Percentage of the absentees among the studied subjects were 21.1% in gross absence and 6.9% in sickness absence. Gross absence rate of subjects was 1.2% and sickness absence rate was 0.5%. 2. In the group of absentees, mean days of absence was 2.8 days and those of sickness was 4.4 days. Mean days of sickness absence due to injury was higher than that of illness, but the total days of sickness absence was high in extremity injuries, trunk injury, general fatigue, head injury, musculoskeletal problem in that order. 3. Variables contributing to the absence were job classification, education level, working hours per day, exposure of noxious factor, worker classification. 4. In the group of absentees, variables influencing the gross absence rate were working atmosphere, body mass infer, working environment, working hours per day but those of the sickness absence were working hours per day, education level and working atomosphere.