DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

HERITABILITIES AND GENETIC CORRELATIONS OF EGG QUALITY TRAITS IN TAIWANS'S LOCAL CHICKEN

  • Chen, C.F. (Department of Animal Science. National Chung-Hsing University) ;
  • Lee, Y.P. (Department of Animal Science. National Chung-Hsing University) ;
  • Lee, Z.H. (Department of Animal Science. National Chung-Hsing University) ;
  • Huang, S.Y. (Pig Reserach Institute) ;
  • Huang, H.H. (Council of Agriculture)
  • Received : 1993.02.27
  • Accepted : 1993.06.19
  • Published : 1993.09.01

Abstract

Means and standard errors of 285 Taiwan's local chicken and 429 Single Comb White Leghorn pullets at 35 wk of age were: egg weight (g) $48.3{\pm}0.3$, $54.6{\pm}0.3$, shell index $73.39{\pm}0.26$, $73.20{\pm}0.18$, shell color $15.23{\pm}0.40$, $0.88{\pm}0.27$, shell whiteness $72.61{\pm}0.57$, $90.00{\pm}0.35$, shell strength ($kg/cm^2$) $3.77{\pm}0.07$, $3.35{\pm}0.05$, shell thickness (mm) $0.38{\pm}0.003$, $0.38{\pm}0.002$, Haugh units $85.26{\pm}0.50$, $91.81{\pm}0.38$ and yolk percent (%) $30.17{\pm}0.18$, $27.32{\pm}0.16$ respectively. Theestimated heritabiliities of Taiwan's local chicken based on sire and dam components of variance were as follows: egg weight 0.20, shell index 0.1, shell color 0.87, shell whiteness 0.79, shell strength 0.37, shell thickness 0.14, Haugh units 0.24 and yolk percent 0.16. Genetic correlations based on sire and dam components of variance and covariance were also estimated. Generically, the shell index was positively correlated with egg weight, shell strength and yolk percent, and egg weight was negatively correlated with shell thickness, Haugh unit and yolk percent.

Keywords

Cited by

  1. Genetic parameters for body weights, egg traits and antibody response against Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) vaccine among two Tanzania chicken ecotypes vol.41, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9153-2
  2. Repeatability estimates of egg weight and egg-shell weight under various production periods for Bovan Nera Black laying chicken vol.5, pp.4, 1993, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjbas.2016.11.001