A STUDY OF THE ROOT SURFACE AREA, ANATOMIC STRUCTURE AND LINEAR VARIATION OF THE ROOT SURFACE AREA OF THE MANDIBULAR SECOND MOLAR

하악 제2대구치 치근의 형태학적 구조 및 표면적에 관한 연구

  • Chung, Hyung-Geun (Dept. of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kwon, Young-Hyuk (Dept. of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Man-Sup (Dept. of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • 정형근 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 권영혁 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 이만섭 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 1993.04.30

Abstract

The thirty six mandibular second molars, which were extracted because of hopeless tooth due to advanced periodontal disease, were measured the length of mesial and distal root and the distance from cementoenamel junction to root separation. The molars were cross-sectioned every 1.5 milimeter from cementoenamel junction to root apex perpendicular to long axis and each section was photographed, projected and measured with a calibrated Digital Curvi-Meter(Com Curvi-8. Japan). The root surface area (RSA), percentage of the RSA and the linear variation of the RSA were calibrated for each 1. 5 mm section. The results were as follows. 1. The mean length of the roots was 12. 98mm for mesial root, 11.84 mm for distal root. The mesial root was longer than distal root.(p<0.01) 2. The mean distance from the cementoenamel junction to the point at which the root separate from the root trunk was 3.82mm for the buccal furcation and 4.75mm for lingual furcation. The buccal root separation was coronal than the lingual root separation.(p<0.01) 3. The total root surface area was $317.78mm^2$. 4. The mean surface area of the root trunk was $150.06mm^2$ and averaged 42.54% of the total root surface area. 5. The mean root surface area was $88.79\;mm^2$ for the mesial root, $78.93mm^2$ for distal root, The mesial root surface area was wider than the distal root surface area.(p<0.05) 6. In comparision, the mean root trunk surface area of the mandibular 2nd molar was wider than that of mandibular 1st molar(p<0.01), but each root of 2nd molar was smaller than that of 1st molar(p<0.01).

Keywords