Effect of the Whole-layer Application of Slow-release Fertilizer on Growth and Yield of Rice

완효성비료의 전층시비가 벼 생육과 수량에 미치는 영향

This experiment was carried out to find out the optimum application method of slow-release fertilizer under different soil textures, clay loam(Deogpyeong series), sandy loam (Gangseo series) in the southern region(Milyang, Kyeongnam) of Korea. The fertilizers used were Chosun slow-release fertilizer(silicate latex coated fertilizer: N-P$_2$O$_{5}$-K$_2$O=18-12-13) and Meister 15 (thermoplastic resin coated fertilizer : N-P$_2$O$_{5}$-K$_2$O=14-14-14). The two whole basal application methods such as side band placement at transplanting time of rice plant(cv.Donghaebyeo) and incorporation with soil as basal were tested. The released amount of ammonium nitrogen from the soils for 4 days submerged was 95ppm in sandy loam and 60ppm in clay loam. The greenish degree of rice leaf was higher at the whole plow layer placement method than the others. The nitrogen efficiencies of the fertilizers were Meister 15 > convention > Chosun in order and between the application methods were similiar. The growth status was better at the whole plow layer placement application method of Meister 15 regardless of soils and seedling ages. The ripening ratio was increased at slow-release fertilizer application, and between application methods, whole plow layer placement was lower because of lodging damage. The yield in clay loam soil showed a significant difference between the ferilizers, but there were slight differences between the application methods and fertilizers in sandy loam soil. As a result, the slow-release fertilizer, Meister 15, applied at the whole layer showed a good rice growth and seemed a plausible fertilizing method.

본 시험은 완효성비료를 이용한 전량기비시비방법을 개선하고자 식양토(덕평통)와 사양토(강서통)에서 완효성비료인 조선완효성비료와 Meister 15를 이용하여 시비방법에 따른 완효성비료의 시용효과를 검토한 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 공시토양별 암모니아태 질소의 용출량은 담수 4일째 사양토에서 95ppm, 식양토에서 60ppm 이었다. 2. 벼 잎색도는 조선완효성비료가 Meister 15보다 낮았고, 시비방법간에는 측조시비구보다 전층시비구에서 높았다. 3. 질소 효율은 Meister 15 > 관행 > 조선완효성비료의 순으로 높았고, 시비방법간에는 차이가 적었다. 4. 단립면적당 경수는 조선완효성비료는 측조시비구가 전층시비구보다 많았고, Meister 15는 전층시비구가 측조시비구보다 많았으며, 간장은 Meister 15 > 관행 > 조선 완효성비료의 순으로 길었고, 시비 방법간에는 전층시비구가 측조시비구보다 길었다. 등숙율은 완효성시비가 관행보다 높았고, 시비방법간에는 전층시비구가 측조시비구보다 낮았다. 5. 수량은 식양토에서 비료간 수량차이가 컸으나, 시비방법간에는 수량차이가 적었고, 사양토에서는 비료간, 시비방법간에 수량차이가 적었다. 6. 이상의 결과에서 Meister 15와 같은 완효성비료는 전층시비법으로 시용하여도 좋을 것으로 판단되었다.