DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Contribution of Electrophilic Interference on Solvolytic Reactions in Fluorinated Alcohol Mixtures

  • Published : 1991.08.20

Abstract

The degree of electrophilic interference on the solvolytic reactions of model substrates has been studied in fluorinated alcohol solvent mixtures. With variation of solvent composition of 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol(HFP) and 2-propanol (PrOH) mixtures, the magnitude of electrophilic solvent assistance was changed inversely with the degree of nucleophilic solvent assistance. The contribution of electrophilic interference for 2-adamantyl tosylate showed higher than tert-butyl chloride in HFP-PrOH mixtures. Through a correlation of nucleophilic solvent assistance and electrophilic solvent assistance based on the method of double differences, HFP-PrOH mixture showed a big discrepancy from non-fluorinated alcohol systems.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Org. Chem. v.48 T. W. Bentley;G. E. Carter
  2. Nucleophilicity, Advances in Chemistry Series American Chemical Society J. M. Harris;S. P. McManus(ed.)
  3. J. Am. Chem. Soc. v.104 T. W. Bentley;G. E. Carter
  4. Adv. Chem. Series no.215 J. M. Harris;S. P. McManus;M. R. Sedaghat-Herati;N. Neamati-Mazraeh;M. J. Kamlet;R. M. Doherty;R. W. Taft;M. H. Abraham
  5. Chem. and Ind. F. L. Scott
  6. Tetrahedron Lett. W. S. Trahanovsky;M. P. Doyle
  7. Tetrahedron Lett. D. J. Raber;M. D. Dukes;J. Gregory
  8. Tetrahedron Lett. G. A. Dafforn;A. Streitwieser Jr.
  9. Tetrahedron Lett. M. D. Bentley;J. A. Lacadie
  10. J. Phys. Chem. v.77 M. A. Matesich;J. Knoefel;H. Feidman;D. F. Evans
  11. Nouv. J. Chim. v.3 B. Allard;A. Casadevall;E. Casadevall;C. Largeau
  12. Tetrahedron Lett. F. L. Schadt;P. v. R. Schleyer;T. W. Bentley
  13. J. Am. Chem. Soc. v.98 F. L. Schadt;T. W. Bentley;P. v. R. Schleyer
  14. J. Am. Chem. Soc. v.103 T. W. Bentley;C. T. Bowen;D. H. Morten;P. v. R. Schleyer
  15. Nucleophilicity, Advances in Chemistry Series American Chemical Society J. M. Harris;S. P. McManus(ed.)
  16. Prog. Phys. Org. Chem. v.7 R. W. Taft
  17. J. Korean Chem. Soc. v.32 I. Lee;H. W. Lee;T. S. Uhm;D. D. Sung;Z. H. Ryu
  18. Philos. Mag. v.5 E. A. Guggenheim
  19. J. Am. Chem. Soc. v.100 F. L. Schadt;C. J. Lancelot;P. v. R. Schleyer
  20. Advances in Physical Organic Chemistry v.14 V. Gold;D. Bethell
  21. J. Phys. Chem. v.77 M. A. Matesich;J. Knoeful;H. Feldman;D. F. Evans
  22. J. Phys. Chem. v.75 D. F. Evans;J. A. Nadas;M. A. Matesich
  23. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. v.14 T. W. Bentley;P. v. R. Schleyer
  24. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin II J. R. Pritt;M. C. Whiting
  25. J. Am. Chem. Soc. v.70 E. Grunwald;S. Winstein
  26. J. Am. Chem. Soc. v.98 T. W. Bentley;F. L. Shadt;P. von R. Schleyer
  27. J. Am. Chem. Soc. v.98 T. W. Bentley;P. v. R. Schleyer
  28. J. Org. Chem. v.49 T. W. Bentley;G. E. Carter;K. Roberts
  29. J. Am. Chem. Soc. v.92 P. v. R. Schleyer;J. L. Fry;L. K. M. Lam;C. J. Lancelot
  30. J. Am. Chem. Soc. v.91 C. J. Lancelot;P. v. R. Schleyer
  31. J. Am. Chem. Soc. v.100 D. J. Raber;W. C. Neal Jr.;M. D. Dukes;J. M. Harris;D. L. Mount
  32. J. Am. Chem. Soc. v.107 S. P. McManus;N. Neamati-Mazraeh;B. A. Hovanes;M. S. Paley;J. M. Harris