Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society (한국경영과학회지)

The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society (한국경영과학회)
권호 표지

MULTICRITERIA MODELS FOR GROUP DECISION MAKING : COMPROMISE PROGRAMMING VS. THE ANALYTIC HIERACHY PROCESS

  • Kwak, N.K. (Saint Louis University) ;
  • McCarthy, Kevin J. (Saint Louis University)
  • Published : 1991.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper describes two contrasting approaches to group decision making involving multiple criteria. A compromise programming method and the analytic hierarchy process are analyzed and compared by using an illustrative example of a computer model selection problem to demonstrate their usefulness as a viable tool for group decision making. This paper further considers some extensions and modifications of there two methods for future study.

Keywords

References

  1. Jonual of Mathematical Psychology v.27 no.1 Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgments Aczel,J;Saaty,T.L.
  2. Management Science v.28 no.6 Priority Ranking and Consensus Formathion: The Case of Ties Armstrong,R.D.;Cook,W.D.;Seiford,L.M.
  3. Mathematical and Computer Modelling v.10 no.6 When to Combine Group Judgements and When Not in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A New Method Basak,I.
  4. Quantitative Systems for Business (QSB+)(Version 2.0) Chang,Y.;Sullivan,R.S.
  5. Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology Chankong,V.;Haimes,Y.Y.
  6. Jonual of the Operational Research Society v.39 no.10 A Case Study of a Non-Compensatory Approach to Ranking Transportation Projects Cook,W.D.;Golan,I.;Kazakov,A.;Kress,M.
  7. Management Science v.24 no.16 Priority Ranking and Consensus Formation Cook,W.D.;Seiford,L.M.
  8. Interfaces v.18 no.5 Ranking Onan's Internatinal Investment Options to Best Meet Its Multiple Objectives Iyer,P.K.
  9. Decision Making with Multiple Objectives. An Interactive Procedure for Solving Group Decision Problems Kersten,G.;Haimes,Y.Y.(ed.);Chankong,V.(ed.)
  10. Jonual of the Operational Research Society v.39 no.9 Resource Analysis in Project Evaluation: A Multicriteria Approach Khorramshahgolm,R.;Steiner,H.M.
  11. Decision Making with Multiple Objectives. Subjective Estimation and its Use in MCDM Lockett,G.;Hetherington,B.;Yallup,P.;Haimes,Y.Y.(ed.);Chankong,V.(ed.)
  12. Decision Sciences v.19 no.4(Fall) An Experimental Evaluation of Articulation of Preferences in Multiple Criterion Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods Narasimhan,R.;Vickery,S.K.
  13. Jonual of Mathematical Psychology v.15 no.3 A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures Saaty,T.L
  14. The Analytic Hierarchy Process Saaty,T.L.
  15. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences v.20 no.6 Exploring Optimization through Hierarchies and Ratio Scales Saaty,T.L.
  16. Decision Sciences v.20 no.2(Spring) Decision Making, Scaling, and Number Crunching Saaty,T.L.
  17. The Logic of Priorities Saaty,T.L.;Vargas,L.G.
  18. Clinical Laboratory Science v.2 no.2(March-April) Laboratory Instrument Evaluation and Selection Procedure Designed for PhySician Office Laboratories Shaikh,A.H.
  19. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences v.23 no.3 Bibliographic Research on the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) Shim,J.P.
  20. Interfaces v.16 no.4(july-August) The Analytic Hierarchy Process-A Survey of the Method and its Applications Zahedi,F.
  21. Multiple Criteria Decision Making Zeleny,M.