Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)
- Volume 9 Issue 1
- /
- Pages.53-67
- /
- 1989
- /
- 1226-5187(pISSN)
- /
- 2288-8489(eISSN)
DEVELOPMENT OF GENERAL PHYSICS CAI PROGRAM FOR UNIVERSITY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING STUDENT
이공계(理工系) 학생을 위한 일반물리학 CAI 프로그램의 개발
- Kim, Chang-Sik (Department of physics education, Kookmin University) ;
- Yoon, Sung-Ro (Department of physics education, Kookmin University) ;
- Cho, Young-Suk (Department of physics education, Kookmin University) ;
- Kim, Chul-Sung (Department of physics education, Kookmin University)
- Published : 1989.06.30
Abstract
General Physics CAI Program was developed for university science and engineering student. The program was restricted in the field of mechanics and was mainly aimed for individual tutorial. This project was supported by Government. Department of Education, physics attending their general physics classes in university. The program was written in BASIC and constructed by frame, 4 professors and 6 graduate students were involved in the project. Summary of this study is as follows. 1. The theory of CAI was illuminated from a new point of view to enhance usefullness of CAI. Also the structure of frame type CAI was studied. 2. The program was developed as follows 1) The program consisted of main program, pretest routine, tutorial routine, final test routine, and several other routines for program control. Whole program was written in BASIC. 2) 20 problems for pretest, 90 problems and subsequent hints and solutions for tutorial, 20 problems for final test were developed. 3) According to student's pretest result, tutorial course was routed through several different courses which contain different number of problems 4) The expected rate of achievment for final test was set to 75%. 5) Data of students response to problems including number of tries and time used were recorded for the purpose of achievment analisys 3. 22 students went through whole course and the results were as follows. 1) Pretest marks were widly distributed from 20 points to 100. It means that achievement of high school physics course were not enough. 2) Throughout tutorial course, students who had got higher mark in pretest answered correctly in the first trial at a higher rate of 78 %. Overall rate of correct answer in the second trial was distributed appropriatly. 3) Average mark of final test was 78.8 points, rather a higher rate of achievement than expected. This means that the program was constructed well.
Keywords