DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Non-Newtonian Intrinsic Viscosities of Biopolymeric and Non-biopolymeric Solutions (II)

  • Jang, Chun-Hag (Department of Chemistry, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Hong (Department of Chemistry, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Ree, Taik-Yue (Department of Chemistry, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Published : 1987.08.20

Abstract

This paper is a continuation of our previous $paper,^1$ and deals with Eq.(1) (see the text), which was theoretically derived in the $paper,^1$$ [{\eta}]^f\; and\; [{\eta}]^0$ is the intrinsic viscosity at stress f and f = O, respectively. Equation (1) predicts how $[{{\eta}}]^f / [{\eta}]^0$ changes with stress f, relaxation time ${\beta}_2$ of flow unit 2 and a constant $c_2$ related with the elasticity of molecular spring of flow unit 2. In this paper, Eq.(1) is applied to a biopolymer, e.g., poly (${\gamma}$-benzyl L-glutamate), and nonbiopolymers, e.g., polyisobutylene, polystyrene, polydimethylsiloxane and cellulose triacetate. It was found that the $c_2$ factor is zero for non-biopolymers while $c_2{\neq}0$ for biopolymers as found $previously.^1$ Because of the non-Newtonian nature of the solutions, the ratio $[{{\eta}}]^f / [{\eta}]^0$ drops from its unity with increasing f. We found that the smaller the ${\beta}_2,$ the larger the $f_c$ at which the viscosity ratio drops from the unity, vice versa.

Keywords

References

  1. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. v.8 no.4 C. H. Jang;J. R. Kim;T. Ree
  2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. v.80 J. T. Yang
  3. J. Am. Chem. Soc. v.81 J. T. Yang
  4. J. Chem. Phys. v.48 A. J. Byerley;B. R. Jennings;H. G. Jerrard
  5. Optimization Techniques with Fortran J. L. Kuester;J. H. Mize
  6. Macromolecules in Solutions H. Morawetz
  7. J. Polym. Sci. v.47 E. Passaglia;J. T. Yang;N. J. Wegemer
  8. J. Chem. Phys. v.41 J. A. Subirana
  9. Principles of Biochemistry A. L. Lehninger