Abstract
This study was conducted to compare the methods of slide dip and leaf dip techniques in the resistant level determination of spider mites to acaricides used; .and to investigate resistant levels of two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch to benzomate, dicofol and cyhexatin in Honam region of Korea. Comparisons of the resistant strains and susceptible strain based on $LC_{50}$ values were summarized. Using the slide dip and leaf dip techniques with benzomate acaricide, the Keumchun strain of T. urticae showed 75-and 69-fold resistant levels, respectively, as compared with the Kwangju susceptible strain, but the Hackyo strain was 38-and 35-fold resistant levels, respectively. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the slide dip and leaf dip methods. With dicofol acaricide, resistant levels of the Keumchun strain of T. urticae were 71 times by using the slide dip and 74 times by using the leaf dip as resistant as the Kwangju susceptible strain while the Hackyo strain was 24 times by the former method and 23 times by the later method. There was also no significant difference (P>0.05) between both the methods. The slide dip technique is more recommendable than the leaf dip technique for determination of degree of chemical resistance to the spider mites with accuracy and less variation of the results. Using the slide dip method with cyhexatin, the Bia, Keumchun and Hackyo strains of T. urticae were 19-, 18- and 9-fold resistant levels, respectively, over the Kwangju susceptible strain.
점박이응애(Tetranychus urticae Koch)에 대(對)한 약제저항성(藥劑抵抗性) 수준(水準)의 결정방법(決定方法) 개선(改善)을 위한 시험(試驗)과 benzomate, dicofol 및 cyhexatin 에 대(對)한 과수원(果樹園) 계통별(系統別) 응애에 대(對)한 관용약제(慣用藥劑)의 저항성(抵抗性) 수준(水準)을 조사(調査)한 결과(結果) : 1. 점박이응애계통(系統)을 $LC_{50}$치(植)로 비교(比較)할 때 benzomate 에 대(對)하여 금천계통(系統)이 광주감수성계통(光州感受性系統)에 비(比)하여 slide dip법(法)으로는 75배(倍)이고 leaf dip법(法)으로는 69배(倍)이며, 학교계통(系統)은 slide dip법(法)으로는 38배(倍)이고 leaf dip법(法)으로는 35배(倍)의 저항성(抵抗性) 수준(水準)을 나타냈으며, 이 두 방법간(方法間)에는 t-test (P>0.05) 에서 유의(有意)하지 않았다. 2. Dicofol에 대(對)하여는 금천계통(系統)이 slide dip법(法)으로 71배(倍)이고 leaf dip법(法)으로는 74배(倍)이며, 학교계통(系統)은 slide dip법(法)으로 24배(倍)이고 leaf dip법(法)으로 는 23배(倍)의 저항성(抵抗性) 수준(水準)을 보여 두 방법간(方法間) 역시 t-test (P>0.05) 에서 유의(有意)하지 않았다. 두 방법(方法) 중 slide dip법(法)이 더 정확(正確)하고 시험오차(試驗誤差)가 더 적으므로 응애류(類)의 약제저항성(藥劑抵抗性) 수준결정(水準快定)에는 이 방법(方法)의 이용(利用)이 바람직스럽다. 3. Cyhexatin에 대(對)한 비아, 금천 및 학교계통(系統)은 slide dip법(法)에 의하여 각각(各各) 19, 18 및 9배(倍)의 저항성(抵抗性) 수준(水準)을 나타냈다.