A Comparison of Soil Hydraulic Conductivities Determined by Three Different Methods in a Sandy Loam Soil

토양(土壤)의 포화투수계수(飽和透水係数) 측정법(測定法) 비교(比較) 연구(硏究)

Comparison and evaluation of various wellknown methods to determine the saturated hydraulic conductivity of soil were attempted in order to choose a convenient and reliable method applicable, at least, to Bonryang sandy loam (coarse loamy over sandy, mixed, mesic family of Typic Udifluvents). Three experimental methods, inversed auger hole, infiltrometer, and core sample method, were used for this purpose. The results were summarized as follows: 1. The inversed auger hole method was highly correlated with the infiltrometer method while the core sample method was poorly correlated with other two methods. 2. The inversed auger hole method was proved to be convenient and reliable method to measure the hydraulic conductivity of upland coarse textured soils in situ. 3. The hydraulic conductivity determined by the infiltrometer method converged to a constant value after 80 to 100 minutes from starting of measurement. 4. The conductivity determined by the inversed auger hole method approached to a constant value at 5 or 6th run of measurement. 5. The hydraulic conductivity determined by the core sample method was greatly under estimated in comparison with the values obtained by other two methods.

포화투수계수(飽和透水係数) 측정방법(測定方法)을 상호비교(相互比較)하여 투수계수(透水係数)의 대양조사(大量調査)에 적합(摘合)한 실용적(実用的)인 측정방법(測定方法)을 선발(選拔)코자 본량(本良) 사양토(砂壤土)에서 침투계법(浸透計法), 역(逆)오가혈법(穴法) 및 코아시료법(試料法)을 비교(比較)한 결과(結果)는 다음과 같다. 1. 침투계법(浸透計法)과 역(逆)오가혈법간(穴法間)에는 고도(高度)의 유의성(有意性)이 있는 회귀관계(回歸関係)가 성립(成立)되었으나 코아시료법(試料法)은 다른 두 방법(方法)에 대해서 전혀 상관(相関)을 나타내지 않았다. 2. 침투계법(浸透計法)에 의(依)해 측정(測定)된 투수계수(透水係数)는 약(約) 80~100분(分) 경과 후 측정(測定)된 한계침투속도(限界浸透速度)와 동일(同一)하였다. 3. 역(逆)오가혈법(穴法)은 5~6회(回) 반복(反覆) 측정(測定)한 값으로부터 안정(安定)된 투수계수(透水係数)를 얻었다. 4. 코아시료(試料)에 의한 침투계수(透水係数) 측정(測定)은 3시간(時間) 이상(以上) 투수(透水)시킨 뒤 얻은 침투계수(透水係数)가 비교적(比較的) 안정(安定)된 값을 나타내었다. 5. 역(逆)오가혈법(穴法)은 측정방법(測定方法)이 간단하고 실용성(実用性)이 높으며 특(特)히 조립질토양(粗粒質土壤)일수록 신뢰도가 높았다.