Abstract
This research was carried out to examine the substitutional feasibility of low-priced materials produced in waste of forest instead of wheat flour which is extended for plywood adhesives. Wheat, pine bark, wood flour and pine foliage of coniferous trees or poplar foliage of hardwood species were selected and pulverized into 60-100 mesh minute powder after they were dried at $100-105^{\circ}C$ during 24 hours in the drying oven. The prepared particles as above were added to urea formaldehyde resin, urea-melamine copolymer resin and water soluble phenol formaldehyde resin in the ratio of 10, 20, 30 and 50%. After plywoods were processed by the above extending ratios, shear strength of extended plywoods were analyzed and discussed. The results obtained at this study were summarised as follows; 1. In the case of urea formaldehyde resin, both dry and wet shear strength of plywoods extended by wheat flour were shown the highest value. 2. Dry shear strength of urea-melamine copolymer resin was better than that of urea formaldehyde resin on the whole, while plywoods extended by wheat flour were shown excellent results. 3. Among 10% and 20% extensions of urea-melamine copolymer resin, the best results were shown by poplar leaves powder, wheat powder and wood flour. They had no significant difference statistically. 4. In the case of water soluble phenol formaldehyde resin, although dry shear strength of pine leaves powder was higher than that of wheat flour in the ratio of 10%, there was no significant difference between them in the ratio of 10 and 20%. 5. Among 20, 30 and 50% extensions of water soluble phenol formaldehyde resin, wet shear strength of wood flour and bark powder was higher than that of wheat flour. Wet shear strength of wood flour in the ratio of 10% was shown the same tendency as above.
본(本) 연구(硏究)는 합판공장(合板工場)에서 증량제(増量剤)로 사용(使用)하고 있는 도입소맥분(導入小麥粉)을 국내(国內)에서 값싸게 생산(生産)할 수 있는 증량제(増量剤)로 대체(代替)키 위한 가능성(可能性)을 규명하기 위해 실시(実施)되었다. 증량재료(増量材料)로는 주(主)로 삼립부산물(森林副産物)을 이용개발(利用開発)키 위(爲)해서 밀가루, 목분(木粉), 수피(樹皮), 소나무낙엽(落葉), 포푸리낙엽(落葉)을 택(擇)하였으며 각각(各各) $100{\sim}105^{\circ}C$에서 24시간(時間)동안 전건(全乾) 시킨 다음 60~100mesh로 분쇄(粉碎)하였다. 증량방법(増量方法)은 요소수지(尿素樹脂)와 요소(尿素)-melamine 공축합수지(共縮合樹脂)는 소맥분(小麥粉), 목분(木粉), 수피분(樹皮粉), 포푸라낙엽분(落葉粉)을 각각(各各) 10, 20, 30, 50%로 증량(増量)하였으며 수용성석탄산수지(水溶性石炭酸樹脂)는 소맥분(小麥粉), 목분(木粉), 수피분(樹皮粉), 소나무낙엽분(落葉粉)을 각각(各各) 10, 20, 30, 50%로 증량(増量)하였다. 본(本) 연구(硏究)에서 얻은 결론(結論)은 다음과 같다. 1. 요소수지(尿素樹脂)에 있어서는 상태(常態) 및 내수접착력(耐水接着力) 모두 소맥분(小麥粉)을 능가(能加)하는 증량제(増量剤)가 없었다. 2. 요소(尿素)-melamine 공축합수지(共縮合樹脂)에 있어서 접착력(接着力)은 요소수지(尿素樹脂)보다 대체로 모두 양호(良好)하였으나 상태접착력(常態接着力)에 있어서 소맥분(小麥粉)보다 좋은 접착제(接着剤)는 없었다. 3. 요소(尿素)-melamine 공축합수지(共縮合樹脂)에 있어서 내수접착력(耐水接着力)의 경우 10, 20%증량(増量)에서 포푸라낙엽분(落葉粉), 소맥분(小麥粉), 목분(木粉)이 가장 양호(良好)했으며 이들간(間)의 유의적(有意的)인 차이(差異)는 없었다. 4. 수용성석탄산수지(水溶性石炭酸樹脂)의 경우 상태접착력(常態接着力)은 10% 증량(増量)의 경우 소맥분(小麥粉)보다도 소나무낙엽분(落葉粉)이 더 양호(良好)하였으며 20% 증량(増量)의 경우도 유의적(有意的)인 차이(差異)는 없었다. 5. 수용성석탄산수지(水溶性石炭酸樹脂)의 경우 내수접착력(耐水接着力)은 10% 증량(増量)의 경우 목분(木粉)이 소맥분(小麥粉)보다 우수(優秀)했으며 20, 30, 50% 증량(増量)의 경우 목분(木粉) 및 수피분(樹皮粉)은 소맥분(小麥粉)보다도 양호(良好)하였다.