A Study on the Manufacture of Hard-board Utilized Amino-resins as the Sizing Materials for the Strength Increase

아미노수지(樹脂)를 보강제(補强劑)로 이용(利用)한 경질섬유판(硬質纖維板) 제조(製造)에 관(關)한 연구(硏究)

This study was carried out to examine the subsitution possibility into water soluble amino resins instead of phenolic resin as a sizing material for the strength increase on the wet forming hardboard. The properties of hardboard, manufactured with amino-resins based urea, melamine, formaline, and methanol which were low priced domestic products, were examined in comparison with those of hardboard treated with phenolic resin. In this study by the results and discussions, it may be summarized as follows: 1. Amino-resins are able to be substituted for the phenolic resin as a good sizing material for strength increase in the manufacture of wet forming hardboard. Under the considerations of economic advantages and properties of hardboard, modified urea-melamine resin was given a best results. 2. The specific gravities of hardboard that were treated with phenolic resin was equal to that treated with modified amino type resin, and in case of urea-melamine resin, the specific gravity value were lowest among them. 3. The results of moisture contents were satisfied the standard which calls for 13 percent or below. There were no differences in moisture contents between hardboards, treated with melamine resin and modified urea-melamine resin but phenolic resin. The moisture contents of hardboard treated with phenolic resin was shown the lowest. 4. The water absorption of hardboard treated with phenolic resin was greater than those treated with amino resins, and to satisfy the standard of water resistance, the treatment of 2 percent paraffin wax emulsion was needed in this case. There were no differences in water absorptions between hardboards, treated with melamine resin and modified urea-melamine resin. To satisfy the standard of water resistance in this case the treatment of 1 percent paraffin wax emulsion was shown good results. 5. The differences among the flexural strength in using tested three adhesives were significant. The flexural strength were shown the signification by order of melamine resin, modified urea-melamine resin, and phenolic resin. In all cases to satisfy the standard of flexural strength, the treatment of 3 percent sizing materials for strength increase was needed.

본(本) 연구(硏究)는 습식(濕式) 硬纖維板(경섬유판) 제조(製造)에 있어 보강제(補强劑)로서 국내생산(國內生産)이 되며 가격(價格)이 저렴한 뇨소(尿素)와 멜라민을 원료(原料)로 수용성(水溶性) 변성(變性) 아마노수지(樹脂)를 제조(製造)하여 석탄산수지(石炭酸樹脂)에 대체(代替)할 수 있는지의 여부(與否)와 이에 따른 제품(製品)의 품질(品質)을 비교(比較)하기 위(爲)해 시행하여 다음과 같은 결론(結論)을 얻었다. 1. 아미노형수지(型樹脂)는 습식(濕式) 경질섬유판(硬質纖維板) 제조(製造)에 있어 석탄산수지(石炭酸樹脂)를 사용(使用)하는 대신(代身) 좋은 보강제(補强劑)로서 대체(代替)할 수 있으며 제품(製品)의 성질(性質) 및 경제적인 면을 고려한 다면 변성(變性) 뇨소(尿素) 멜라민 공축합수지(共縮合樹脂)가 제일 우수하다고 생각된다. 2. 석탄산수지(石炭酸樹脂)와 아미노형수지(型樹脂)를 사용(使用)한 섬유판(纖維板)의 비중(比重)은 유의차(有意差)가 없었으며 뇨소 멜라민수지(樹脂)의 경우 다소 떨어지는 경향을 보이고 있으나 경질섬유판(硬質纖維板)의 규격(規格)을 모두 만족시켜 주고 있다. 3. 석탄산수지(石炭酸樹脂)를 사용(使用)한 경우 함수율(含水率)은 다른 수지(樹脂)에 비(比)해 낮았으며 뇨소(尿素) 멜라민공축합수지(共縮合樹脂) 및 메라민수지(樹脂)의 경우 별차(別差)가 없었다. 4. 석탄산수지(石炭酸樹脂)를 사용(使用)할 경우 흡수율(吸水率)이 제일 높았으며 규정흡수율(規定吸收率) 이하(以下)로 내리기 위(爲)해서는 2%의 파라핀 왁스유탁액(乳濁液) 처리함이 필요하다. 뇨소(尿素)멜라민공축합수지(共縮合樹脂) 및 멜라민수지(樹脂)의 경우 내수성(耐水性)은 석탄산수지(石炭酸樹脂)보다 좋고 이 둘의 경우 유의차(有意差)는 없었으며 1%의 파라핀 왁스유탁액(乳濁液)으로서 충분하였다. 5. 보강용(補强用) 접착제(接着劑)에 따른 곡강도(曲强度)의 차(差)는 유의성(有意性)이 있었으며 높은 순위로 멜라민수지, 뇨소(尿素)멜라민공축합수지(共縮合樹脂), 폐놀수지(樹脂)로 나타나며 경질섬유판(硬質纖維板)의 규정요구강도(規定要求强度) 얻기 위(爲)해서는 공히 3% 수지를 처리함이 필요하다.