Abstract
A national programme of erosion control for soil and water conservation needs to be based on factual information about rates and quantities of soil erosion and of water runoff. The best and simplest way of reducing sedimentation pollution is to prevent or control the erosion at its sources. Steeply sloping earth banks are liable to both surface erosion and land-slides and the key to the control of these form of erosion lies with drainages and dense vegetation establishment including surface mulching on the slopes. Micro-plots having $1.6m^2$ (1 metre in width and 1.6 metres in slope length, and 1:1.2 in gradient) of banking slopes on the coarse sand soil are used to establish the order of magnititude of the difference in controlling of soil erosion and water runoff, and in potentiality of execution in consideration of the values of landscapes, performed on the 2 repetetions of six-experiment plots consisted of five surface mulches including seedings and one bare slope as a control treatment. The main results obtained may be summarized as follows: 1. The significant difference is realized in the quantities of soil erosion between the measures of six treatments. 2. Excepting the differences between treatment III and VI, the significant difference is realized in the rate of surface runoff between each treatment measures. 3. Both measures of treatment II and IV are recognized as the most effective measures in controlling the soil erosion and water runoff and also in establishing the ground vegetation. (Treatment II is a measures of the coarse straw-mat mulchings on the micro-strip seedings, Treatment IV is a measures of the "SPRAY-ON method" on the micro-strip seedings). In consideration of the potentiality of execution as well as the value of landscapes, the measures of treatment II could be recommendable for establishing the vegetation cover on the denuded gentle slopes in hillsides while the measures of treatment IV could be suitable for accelerating the establishment of vegetation on steeply sloping earth banks and cuts.
사면나지(斜面裸地)를 속(速)히 녹화(綠化) 보호(保護) 안정(安定)시킬 수 있는 효과적(効果的)인 속성녹화공법(速成綠化工法)을 개발(開發)하고저 녹화종자(綠化種子)의 파종(播種)과 지표피복(地表被覆)을 위주(爲主)로 하는 6개(個) 녹화공법(綠化工法)의 사방효과(砂防効果) 즉(卽) 유수유토(流水流土)의 유출방지효과(流出防止効果), 식피조성효과(植被造成効果), 그리고 시공성(施工性) 및 경관적(景觀的) 효과등(効果等)에 관(關)한 시험(試驗)을 한 결과(結果)는 다음과 같이 요약(要約)될수 있다. 본(本) 시험(試驗)은 1974년(年) 5월(月)부터 11월(月)까지 7개월간(個月間)에 인공성토사면(人工盛土斜面)(1:1.2) 조사토(粗砂土)에서 수행(遂行)되었으며 1시험구(試驗區)의 크기는 사면적(斜面的) $1.6m^2$(폭(幅) 1m, 사면장(斜面長) 1.6m)이었다. 1. 토사유실량(土砂流失量)에 있어서는 각(各) 처리간(處理間)에 모두 유의성(有意性)이 인정(認定)되었다. 2. 지표유법수(地表流法水)의 유출율(流出率)에 있어서는 처리(處理) III과 처리(處理)VI간(間)을 제외(除外)하고 다른 각(各) 처리간(處理間)에 유의성(有意性)이 인정(認定)되었다. 3. 유수유토방지(流水流土防止) 및 식피조성면(植被造成面)에서 처리(處理) II 및 처리(處理)IV구(區)의 시공(施工)이 다같이 효과적(効果的)인 녹화공법(綠化工法)이라고 볼 수 있다. 그러나 시공성(施工性)과 경관적(景觀的) 효과(効果)를 배려(配慮)할 때에는 처리(處理)II공법(工法)은 황폐산지사면(荒廢山地斜面)의 속성녹화공법(速成綠化工法)으로서 적절(適切)하며 처리(處理)IV공법(工法) 노변(路邊)과 같은 인공사면(人工斜面)의 속성녹화공법(速成綠化工法)으로서 보다 효과적(効果的)일 것으로 생각된다.