초록
이와같은 방법(方法)에 의(依)하여 얻은 몇가지 시험결과(試驗結果)를 요약(要約)하면 다음과 같다. 1. 어느 시험구(試驗區)를 막론(莫論)하고 건조진행(乾燥進行)은 표층토(表層土)가 라지구(裸地區)보다는 초지구(草地區)가 그 진행속도(進行速度)가 좀빠른 경향(傾向)을 나타냈다. 2. 건조과정(乾燥過程)에 강우(降雨)가 있으며 토양수분(土壤水分)은 강우침투경로(降雨浸透經路)를 통(通)하여 포장용수량(圃場容水量) 또는 수분당량(水分當量) 부근(附近)으로 회복(回復)하고 있다. 3. 성층토양(成層土壤)에서 하층토(下層土)의 토성(土性)이 상층토(上層土)의 건조(乾燥)에 미치는 영향(影響)은 다음과 같이 설명(說明)된다. 가. 하층토(下層土)가 S이고 토층토(土層土)가 CL 또는 SL인 경우에 이 CL 또는 SL의 건조(乾燥)는 포장용수량(圃場容水量)이 적은 하층(下層)의 S가 어느정도(程度) 모관수공급(毛管水供給)의 차단층(遮斷層)이 되어 하층토(下層土)가 SL 또는 CL로 되었을 때보다 훨씬 건조(乾燥)가 빨리 진행(進行)하며 CL보다는 SL쪽이 현저(顯著)하게 빨리 건조(乾燥)한다. 나. 하층토(下層土)가 SL이고 상층토(上層土)가 S 또는 SL인경우에 이 S 또는 CL의 건조(乾燥)는 포장용수량(圃場容水量)이 비교적(比較的) 크고 또 모관수전도도(毛管水傳導度)도 비교적(比較的) 원활(圓滑)한 하층(下層)의 SL로 인(因)하여 그 진행속도(進行速度)가 가장 완만하며 S보다는 CL쪽이 더빨리 건조(乾燥)하는 경향(傾向)이다. 다. 하층토(下層土)가 CL이고 상층토(上層土)가 S 또는 SL인 경우에 이 S 또는 SL의 건조(乾燥)는 포장용수량(圃場容水量)이 가장 크나 모관수전도도(毛管水傳導度)가 가장느린 하층(下層)의 CL로 인(因)하여 그 진행속도(進行速度)가 비교적(比較的) 빠른 편(便)이며 S보다는 SL쪽이 더 발리 건조(乾燥)하는 경향(傾向)이다. 4. 상층토양(上層土壤) 및 하층토양(下層土壤)에서의 함수비(含水比)에 대(對)한 1일간(日間)의 시간적(時間的) 변화(變化)를 보면 상층토양(上層土壤)이 CL 및 SL에 있어서는 기온(氣溫)이 상승(上昇)하는 $12{\sim}15$시(時) 사이 까지는 함수비(含水比)가 감소(減少)되고 18시(時) 이후(以後)부터는 약간(若干) 회복(回復)하는 경향(傾向)을 보이는데 이에 반(反)하여 S에 있어서는 기온(氣溫)이 상승(上昇)하는 $12{\sim}15$시(時)에 함수비(含水比)가 Peak점(點)을 이루는 경향(傾向)을 보였으며 하층토양(下層土壤)에서의 함수비(含水比)는 CL, SL 및 S모두 기온상승(氣溫上昇)에 따라서 약간감소(若干減少)하는 경향(傾向)을 나타냈고 구름낀날의 함수비(含水比)의 변화(變化)는 CL, SL 및 S공(共)히 맑은 날에 비(比)하여 약간(若干) 작은 경향(傾向)을 보였다. 5. 적산계기증발량(積算計蒸發量)에 대(對)한 적산토양수분소비율(積算土壤水分消費率)은 일반적(一般的)으로 화지구(華地區)가 라지구(裸地區)보다 큰 경향(傾向)을 보였으며 시일(時日)의 경과(經過)에 따라 그 율(率)이 감소(減少)하는 경향(傾向)을 보였고 또 그것은 초기(初期)에는 주(主)로 상층토양(上層土壤)의 토성(土性)에 좌우(左右)되고 후기(後期)에는 하층토양(下層土壤)의 토성(土性)에 많이 좌우(左右)되는 경향(傾向)이었다. 6. 적산토양수분소비율(積算土壤水分消費率)은 하층토(下層土)가 SL 또는 S이고 상층토(上層土)가 CL인 경우(境遇)에 하층(下層)이 SL인 경우(境遇)가 S인 경우보다 변화폭(變化幅)에 컸으며, 하층(下層)이 CL, 또는 S이고 상층(上層)이 SL인 경우(境遇)는 가장 큰 값을 나타냈는데 하층(下層)이 CL인 소우(塑遇)의 그 값은 S인 경우보다 약간(若干)큰 경향(傾向)을 보였다. 또한 하층(下層)이 CL 또는 SL이고 상층(上層)이 S인 경우는 위에 말한 두 경우보다도 작은 값을 보였으며 하층(下層)이 CL인 경우(境遇)가 SL인 경우보다 더욱더 작은 값을 나타내는 경향(傾向)을 보였으며, 즉(卽) 본시험(本試驗)에서의 토양수분(土壤水分) 소비율(消費率)은 대체(大體)로 SL/CC> SL/S>CL/SL> CL/S$\fallingdotseq$S/SL> S/CL>의 순위(順位)로 되었다.
This study was to investigate the drying mechanism of stratified soil by investigating 'effects of the upper soil on moisture loss of the lower soil and vice versa' and at the same time by examining how the drying progressed in the stratified soils with bare surface and with vegetated surface respectively. There were six plots of the stratified soils with bare surface($A_1- A_6$ plot) and the same other six plots($B_1- B_5$ plot), with vegetated surface(white clover). These six plots were made by permutating two kinds of soils from three kinds of soils; clay loam(CL). Sandy loam(SL). Sand(s). Each layer was leveled by saturating sufficient water. Depth of each plot was 40cm by making each layer 20cm deep and its area. $90{\times}90(cm^2)$. The cell was put at the point of the central and mid-depth of the each layer in the each plot in order to measure the soil moisture by using OHMMETER. soil moisture tester, and movement of soil water from out sides was cut off by putting the vinyl on the four sides. The results obtained were as follow; 1. Drying progressed from the surface layer to the lower layer regardless of plots. There was a tendency thet drying of the upper soil was faster than that of the lower soil and drying of the plot with vegetated surface was also faster than that of the plot with bare surface. 2. Soil moisture was recovered at approximately the field capacity or moisture equivalent by infiltration in the course of drying, when there was a rainfall. 3. Effects of soil texture of the lower soil on dryness of the upper soil in the stratified soil were explained as follows; a) When the lower soil was S and the upper, CL or SL, dryness of the upper soils overlying the lower soil of S was much faster than that overlying the lower soil of SL or CL, because sandy soil, having the small field capacity value and playing a part of the layer cutting off to some extent capillary water supply. Drying of SL was remarkably faster than that of CL in the upper soil. b) When the lower soil was SL and the upper S or CL, drying of the upper soil was the slowest because of the lower SL, having a comparatively large field capacity value. Drying of CL tended to be faster than that of S in the upper soil. c) When the lower soil was CL and the upper S or SL, drying of the upper soil was relatively fast because of the lower CL, having the largest field capacity value but the slowest capillary conductivity. Drying of SL tended to be faster than that of S in the upper soil. 4. According to a change in soil moisture content of the upper soil and the lower soil during a day there was a tendency that soil moisture contents of CL and SL in the upper soil were decreased to its minimum value but that of S increased to its maximum value, during 3 hours between 12.00 and 15.00. There was another tendency that soil moisture contents of CL, SL and S in the lower soil were all slightly decreased by temperature rising and those in a cloudy day were smaller than those in a clear day. 5. The ratio of the accumulated soil moisture consumption to the accumulated guage evaporation in the plot with vegetated surface was generally larger than that in the plot with bare surface. The ratio tended to decrease in the course of time, and also there was a tendency that it mainly depended on the texture of the upper soil at the first period and the texture of the lower soil at the last period. 6. A change in the ratio of the accumulated soil moisture consumption was larger in the lower soil of SL than in the lower soil of S. when the upper soil was CL and the lower, SL and S. The ratio showed the biggest figure among any other plots, and the ratio in the lower soil plot of CL indicated sligtly bigger than that in the lower soil plot of S, when the upper soil was SL and the lower, CL and S. The ratio showed less figure than that of two cases above mentioned, when the upper soil was S and the lower CL and SL and that in the lower soil plot of CL indicated a less ratio than that in the lower soil plot of SL. As a result of this experiments, the various soil layers wero arranged in the following order with regard to the ratio of the accumulated soil moisture consumption: SL/CL>SL/S>CL/SL>CL/S$\fallingdotseq$S/SL>S/CL.