Studies on the Varietal resistance to the rice stripe virus disease

줄무늬잎마름병(호엽고병)에 대한 벼품종의 저항성에 관한 연구

  • Lee S. H. (Institute of Plant Environment, Office of Rural Development) ;
  • Kim C. H. (Dong Kook University)
  • Published : 1968.12.01

Abstract

In order to develop an effective control measure for the rice stripe disease, methods of testing for resistance and selection of resistant varieties among the leading varieties were investigated. For use as a parent in breeding for resistant variety to the disease, total of 410 rice varieties were tested. 1. Disease occurrence was higher at group inoculation than that of individual inoculation in comparing the inoculation methods. 2. In both methods, Lacrose responded susceptible; Zenith and St. No. 1 resistant, and the rest moderate. 3. Suseptible symptom type A was prevalant among the susceptible varieties, while resistant symptom type C was abundant among the resistant varieties, There was no difference between the inoculation methods. 4. 410 rice varieties tested could he divided into 3 groups as susceptible (21 varieties), moderate (377 varieties) and resistant (12 varieties). Resistant varieties wers St. No. 1 and 2, Shin-2, Gulfrose Bonnet, Arkrose, Sun Bonnet, Zenith, Yeechunchilichal, Norm-24, Opaikjoke, Yangchubatchal and Nonglimana-1, Nams-97,-149, -159, -216. -265, Iri-243, -265, Kanchuk -5, -7, -8, -10, -41, -43, -47, -50, Suwon-56, -77, Norin-22, Cod-4. Lacrose and Chukna were susceptible. 5. There was slight differance in the disease occurrence in regard to maturing period. However late varieties seem to be more resistant than early or medium varieties. The medium varieties seem to be susceptible. Most of the introduced varieties from foreign countries and the upland cultivated varieties were resistant. 6 Among the leading varieties, Shin-2 in Kangwon-Do was resistant, Kosi in Choongchung-Do, was susceptible, aad the others were moderate.

벼의 줄무늬잎마름병 방제에 보다 능률적이고 완전한 실효를 얻기 위해 우선 본병에 대한 저항성 검정방법을비교검토하고 장려 품종 중에서 저항성품종을 선발하여 장래 저항성품종 육성의 모체를 제공할 목적으로 410품종에 대하여 저항성검정을 실시하였다. (1) 집단접종과 개체접종법을 비교 검토한 결과 발병률은 집단접종법이 다소 높은 경향이 있어 차이가 있음을 알 수 있다. (2) 발병지수에서 Lacrose는 두 방법이 모두 S였고 Zenith$\cdot$St. No.1$\cdot$St. No. 2$는 R, 나머지는 M로 나타나 같은 경향을 보여 주었다. (3) 병징형은 이병성품종에서는 모두 감수성형인 A형이 많고 저항성품종에서는 반대로 저항성병징형인 C형이 많아 두 방법이 같은 경향을 보여 주였다. (4) 410품종의 저항성검정에서 저항성이(12품종) St. No.1$\cdot$St. No. 2$\cdot$ 신 2호$\cdot$Gulfrosebonnet$\cdot$Arkroe$\cdot$Sunbonnet$\cdot$Zenith$\cdot$이천칠일찰$\cdot$농림 24호$\cdot$오백조계$\cdot$양주밭찰$\cdot$농림나 1호 등이고 남선97$\cdot\;149\cdot\;159\cdot\;216\cdot\265$호, 이황 $243\cdot\;265$, 간척 $5\cdot\;7\cdot\;8\cdot\;10\cdot\;41\cdot\;43\cdot\;47\cdot\;50$호 수원 $56\cdot$77호$\cdot$농림 22호$\cdot\;Cod-4\cdot\;Lacrose\cdot\;$적나 등은 이병성이며, 중간성이 377품종이었다. (5) 숙기별로 볼 때 큰 차이는 없으나, 만생$\cdot$조생$\cdot$중생종의 순으로 저항성이 컸다. (6) 장려품 중에서는 신 2호 외는 거의 중간성이었다.

Keywords