DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Challenges for implementing smart construction in Korean construction industry using MICMAC-ISM approach

  • Junhak Lee (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jinwoo Won (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Seung H. Han (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • Published : 2024.07.29

Abstract

Despite various government and institutional movements to promote implementation of smart construction, the utilization of smart technologies in the construction industry is still low compared to other industries. To take a systemic look at the impediments in the implementation of smart construction, this study identifies and analyzes the challenging factors of smart construction within the Korean construction industry. Through content analysis of relevant literature, including official documents, research reports, databases, 19 challenging factors have been identified. The intricate relationships among these challenging factors have been examined based on a hierarchy structure established by using the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) approach. Furthermore, factors are classified into four distinct clusters by using the MICMAC analysis: driving factors, dependent factors, autonomous factors, and linkage factors. This classification delineates the interrelationships among the challenging factors and identifies the key factors that drive the system, which is different from that in traditional studies where the relative importance is generally given between factors. The findings will provide crucial information for policy designers and top-level authorities, indicating which challenging factors to prioritize limited resources and efforts. It will aid in formulating effective policies, standards, and regulations to foster the implementation of smart construction in the Korean construction industry.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2022R1A2C1012018).

References

  1. T. D. Oesterreich and F. Teuteberg, "Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry," Computers in Industry, vol. 83, pp. 121-139, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006.
  2. J. Blanco, D. Rockhill, A. Sanghvi, and A. Torres, "From start-up to scale-up: accelerating growth in construction technology," McKinsey & Company, 2023.
  3. Statstics Korea, "Survey of Business Activities," Development and Utilization of 4th Industrial Revolution Technology by Industry Classification, 2022.
  4. B.-G. Hwang, J. Ngo, and J. Z. K. Teo, "Challenges and Strategies for the Adoption of Smart Technologies in the Construction Industry: The Case of Singapore," Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 38, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000986.
  5. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korea, S-Construction, a plan to revitalize smart construction, 2022.
  6. R. Attri, N. Dev, and V. Sharma, "Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: an overview," Research journal of management sciences, vol. 2319, no. 2, p. 1171, 2013.
  7. Construction & Economy Research Institute of Korea, "Digital Transformation in the Construction Industry Trends and responses," 2022.
  8. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, "A study on the direction of monitoring and regulation improvement to activate smart construction technology," 2019.
  9. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korea, Smart Construction Technology Roadmap, 2018.
  10. Korean Research Institute for Construction Policy, "Trend Analysis and Implications of Smart Safety Technology," 2022.
  11. D. Jeong, Kim, Sehoon, & Im, Seokbeen., "A Study on Institutional Improvement to Activate Field Application of Smart Construction Safety Technology," Journal of Korea Institute of Construction Safety, vol. 4(1), 2021, doi: 10.20931/JKICS.2021.4.1.016.
  12. P. Smith, "BIM Implementation - Global Strategies," Procedia Engineering, vol. 85, pp. 482-492, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.575.
  13. X. Li, W. Yi, H.-L. Chi, X. Wang, and A. P. C. Chan, "A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety," Automation in Construction, vol. 86, pp. 150-162, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.11.003.
  14. J. Li, D. Greenwood, and M. Kassem, "Blockchain in the built environment and construction industry: A systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases," Automation in Construction, vol. 102, pp. 288-307, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.005.
  15. J. Buchli et al., "Digital in situ fabrication - Challenges and opportunities for robotic in situ fabrication in architecture, construction, and beyond," Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 112, pp. 66-75, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.013.
  16. Y. Chen and J. M. Kamara, "A framework for using mobile computing for information management on construction sites," Automation in Construction, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 776-788, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.01.002.
  17. M. Jia, A. Komeily, Y. Wang, and R. S. Srinivasan, "Adopting Internet of Things for the development of smart buildings: A review of enabling technologies and applications," Automation in Construction, vol. 101, pp. 111-126, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.023.
  18. M. Bilal et al., "Big Data in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities, and future trends," Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 500-521, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2016.07.001.
  19. A. Akanmu, S. Professor Monty, A. Professor Mohan M. Kumaraswamy, and C. J. Anumba, "Cyber-physical systems integration of building information models and the physical construction," Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 516-535, 2015, doi: 10.1108/ecam-07-2014-0097.
  20. J. Majrouhi Sardroud, "Influence of RFID technology on automated management of construction materials and components," Scientia Iranica, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 381-392, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.scient.2012.02.023.
  21. Y. Pan and L. Zhang, "Integrating BIM and AI for Smart Construction Management: Current Status and Future Directions," Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1081-1110, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11831-022-09830-8.
  22. H. Liu, S. Han, and Z. Zhu, "Blockchain Technology toward Smart Construction: Review and Future Directions," Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 149, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.1061/jcemd4.Coeng-11929.
  23. D. Aloini, R. Dulmin, V. Mininno, and S. Ponticelli, "Key antecedents and practices for Supply Chain Management adoption in project contexts," Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1301-1316, 2015.
  24. V. Jain and T. Raj, "Modelling and analysis of FMS productivity variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach," Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 218-232, 2014.
  25. P. Kannusamy Panneer Selvam and R. B. Thangavelu, "The IMBES model for achieving excellence in manufacturing industry: an interpretive structural modeling approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, vol. 10, pp. 602-622, 2019.
  26. A. Mandal and S. Deshmukh, "Vendor selection using interpretive structural modelling (ISM)," International journal of operations & production management, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 52-59, 1994.
  27. K. C. Iyer and M. Sagheer, "Hierarchical structuring of PPP risks using interpretative structural modeling," Journal of construction engineering and management, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 151-159, 2010.
  28. L. Shen, X. Song, Y. Wu, S. Liao, and X. Zhang, "Interpretive Structural Modeling based factor analysis on the implementation of Emission Trading System in the Chinese building sector," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 127, pp. 214-227, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.151.
  29. X. Chen, G. Locatelli, X. Zhang, Y. Gong, and Q. He, "Firm and project innovation outcome measures in infrastructure megaprojects: An interpretive structural modelling approach," Technovation, vol. 109, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102349.