Heat transfer analysis of closed-loop vertical ground heat exchangers using 3-D fluid flow and heat transfer numerical model

3차원 열유체 수치해석을 통한 현장 시공된 수직 밀폐형 지중열교환기의 열전달 거동 평가

  • Park, Moon-Seo (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Chul-Ho (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Min, Sun-Hong (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kang, Shin-Hyung (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Konyang University) ;
  • Choi, Hang-Seok (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University)
  • 박문서 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학부) ;
  • 이철호 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학부) ;
  • 민선홍 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학부) ;
  • 강신형 (건양대학교 기계공학과) ;
  • 최항석 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학부)
  • Published : 2010.09.09

Abstract

In this study, a series of numerical analyses has been performed in order to evaluate the performance of a full-scale closed-loop vertical ground heat exchanger constructed in Wonju. The circulation pipe HDPE, borehole and surrounding ground were modeled using FLUENT, a finite-volume method (FVM) program, for analyzing the heat transfer process of the system. Two user-defined functions (UDFs) accounting for the difference in the temperatures of the circulating inflow and outflow water and the change of the surrounding ground temperature with depth were adopted in the FLUENT model. The thermal properties of materials estimated in laboratory were used in the numerical analyses to compare the thermal efficiency of the cement grout with that of the bentonite grout used in the construction. The results of the simulation provide a verification of the in situ thermal response test data. The numerical model with the ground thermal conductivity of 4W/mK yielded the simulation result closer to the in-situ thermal response test than with the ground thermal conductivity of 3W/mK. From the results of the numerical analyses, the effective thermal conductivities of the cement and bentonite grouts were obtained to be 3.32W/mK and 2.99 W/mK, respectively.

Keywords