• Title, Summary, Keyword: 인상채득방법

Search Result 78, Processing Time 0.04 seconds

Comparison of patient satisfaction with digital and conventional impression for prosthodontic treatment (보철 치료 시 디지털 및 전통적 인상채득에 대한 환자 만족도 비교 연구)

  • Yoon, Hyung-In;Lee, Su-Min;Park, Eun-Jin
    • The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
    • /
    • v.54 no.4
    • /
    • pp.379-386
    • /
    • 2016
  • Purpose: The present study aims at researching the subjective satisfaction of patients who have experienced both conventional impression taking and digital impression taking to measure the possibility of wide clinical application of digital impression. Materials and methods: The study surveyed 170 adult patients over the age of 20, between October 2015 and April 2016, who voluntarily consented to participation and who experienced both conventional impression and digital impression at five dental hospitals that use intraoral digital impression. A total of 128 surveys were used for data analysis, involving frequency analysis, multiple response frequency analysis, descriptive statistics, and contingency table analysis, with the significance level set at 0.05. Results: Responses on the reason for taking impressions using the digital method appeared in the order of 'for implant treatment' (43.8%), 'for crown treatment' (30.5%), and 'for inlay treatment' (15.6%). Patients satisfaction was higher for digital impression taking than conventional impression taking (P<.05). As the preferred choice of impression, digital impression (60.2%) was higher than conventional impression (11.7%). Responses on the reason for choosing digital impression taking appeared in the order of 'no vomiting reflex' (35.1%), 'reliability of 3D digital scanning' (33.8%), and 'short time' (33.8%). Conclusion: The patients preferred digital impression taking to conventional impression taking in terms of satisfaction.

Questionnaire survey for the clinical trial participants who experienced both digital and conventional impression (디지털 인상법과 종래인상법을 동시에 경험한 임상시험자를 대상으로 한 설문지분석)

  • Yang, Eunbee;Kim, Bongju;Lee, Jun Jae;Lee, Seung-Pyo;Lim, Young-Jun
    • Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
    • /
    • v.34 no.4
    • /
    • pp.270-279
    • /
    • 2018
  • Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the patients' perception, acceptance, and preference of the difference between a conventional impression and digital impression through questionnaire survey. Materials and Methods: Thirteen (6 male, 7 female) subjects who experienced both digital and conventional impression at the same day were enrolled in this study. Conventional impression were taken with polyvinylsiloxane and digital impression were performed using a newly developed intra-oral scanner. Immediately after the two impressions were made, a survey was conducted with the standardized questionnaires consisting of the following three categories; 1) general dental treatment 2) satisfaction of conventional impression 3) satisfaction of digital impression. The perceived source of satisfaction was evaluated using Likert scale. The distribution of the answers was assessed by percentages and statistical analyses were performed with the paired t-test, and P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: There were significant differences of the overall satisfaction between two impression methods (P < 0.05). Digital impression showed high satisfaction in less shortness of breath and odor to participants compared to conventional impression. The use of an oral scanner resulted in a discomfort of TMJ due to prolonged mouth opening and in lower score of the scanner tip size. Conclusion: It was confirmed that the preference for the digital impression using intraoral scanner is higher than the conventional impression. Most survey participants said they would recommend the digital impression to others and said they preferred it for future prosthetic treatment.

전치부 고정성 보철치료를 위한 인상채득시 주의사항

  • Baek, Seung-Jin
    • The journal of the Korean dental association
    • /
    • v.39 no.11
    • /
    • pp.892-897
    • /
    • 2001
  • 인상(impression)은 치과임상에서 매일같이 반복되는 과정이다. 본문에서는 주로 전치부심미보철을 위한 인상채득 방법에 대해서 알아보고자 한다. 모든 종류의 보철물에서 인상 채득은 필수적이르므로 인상 재료의 여러가지 성질과 그 특성에 대해서 잘 알아야 할 필요가 있다. 치은연하 변연의 경우에 정확한 인상 채득을 위해서는 치은압배가 필요한데, 여기에서는 지대치삭제 요령, 치은압배술 및 인상채득시 주의사항에 대해 살펴보기로 한다.

  • PDF

The convergence study on the use of dental impression materials (치과용 인상재의 사용 실태에 대한 융합 연구)

  • Jang, Sun-Ok;Choi, Eun-Mi;Kang, Min-Kyung;Shim, Youn-Soo;Cho, Yoon-Jeong;Oh, Sang-Hwan;Choi, Yu-Ri
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.16 no.4
    • /
    • pp.195-203
    • /
    • 2018
  • This study was conducted to investigate the types and methods of dental impression materials used in dental clinics in south Korea, the questionnaire was surveyed by a self-administered method for one dentist in a one dental clinic, the collected data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 20. The most frequently used addition silicone impression materials were used in most dental treatment. It was confirmed that the method of taking impression materials having different flow properties(light body and heavy body) was most preferred at one time, also, the implant impression taking method was the most preferred for two rubber impression materials with different flow properties, both direct and indirect. There were statistically significant differences in age and clinical experience between the methods of impression taking of casting restorations and prosthetic according to general characteristics. These results are expected to be helpful for the development of theoretical and practical work based on the basic data for impression material development and research and the preference of impression materials required for dental professional in clinical practice.

An alternative impression technique based on McLean's functional impression concept (McLean의 기능 인상법에 기반한 새로운 인상채득법)

  • Choi, Hyun-Suk;Cho, Jin-Hyun
    • The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
    • /
    • v.55 no.1
    • /
    • pp.32-37
    • /
    • 2017
  • In this case report, an alternative impression technique for fabricating removable partial dentures was used in a patient with very few remaining teeth. In this technique, an individual tray was made on the cast, which was made by relining interim denture and taking overimpression with irreversible hydrocolloid according to McLean's functional impression concept. This method showed the following advantages: the no need for border molding with modeling compound, time saving for denture impression without overextension and accurate seating of the individual tray.

Impression procedures for removable partial dentures (가철성 국소의치 제작을 위한 인상채득)

  • Heo, Yu-Ri;Son, Mee-Kyoung
    • Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
    • /
    • v.30 no.2
    • /
    • pp.152-158
    • /
    • 2014
  • To fabricate removable partial denture which provide patient's comfort and maintain oral health, cast fabrication which reproduce anatomical and functional state of mouth is needed. Diagnostic cast and master cast are produced through the process of preliminary impression and final impression taking. Both of remaining teeth and edentulous area should be well taken in removable partial denture impression. According to the supporting type of partial denture, impression material and method can be changed. Therefore, understanding of impression procedure is essential for the accurate clinical application.

Three Dimensional Comparative Study On The Accuracy Of Impression Technique Using New Impression Coping (새로운 인상용 코핑을 이용한 임플란트 인상법의 정확성에 대한 3차원적 비교 연구)

  • Kim, Se-Ra;Kim, In-Soo;Park, Sung-Jae;Lee, Byung-Ok;Ko, Sok-Min
    • Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
    • /
    • v.26 no.3
    • /
    • pp.323-337
    • /
    • 2010
  • The objective of this study was to examine the availability of the new impression coping by comparing with conventional coping in implant pick-up impression technique. Five implant fixtures were installed on #14, 21, 23, 25, 27 in acrylic resin model. That model with 5 fixtures was standard model, which was divided 3 groups; using new flag type impression coping, conventional impression coping splinted with self-curing resin, conventional impression coping without splinting. We made metal circular cones for calculation 3-dimensional coordinates by attaching to implant fixtures or analogs. Three-dimensional relationships of each model were calculated. Data was analyzed by multiple ANOVA and Bonferroni. The accuracy of impression between using new flag type impression coping and conventional impression coping did not show differences in 3 - dimensional analysis.Within limitations of this study, the new flag type impression coping is available in implant pick-up impression technique.

Accuracy of the healing abutment and impression coping combined system on implant impression (인상채득이 가능한 치유지대주를 이용한 임플란트 인상채득의 정확성)

  • Jeon, Kyoung-Bae;Lee, Du-Hyeong;Kim, Jung-Han;Hwang, Jun-Ho;Park, Hyun-We;Lee, Kyu-Bok
    • The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
    • /
    • v.53 no.2
    • /
    • pp.105-110
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 3 dimensional accuracy of impression taking on the newly developed healing abutment and impression coping combined system comparing conventional pick-up type impression. Materials and methods: For 10 patients who had a single missing tooth on molar area, dental implants (SuperLine; Dentium, Seoul, Korea) were placed and healing abutment (MyHealing; Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea) abutments were connected. After 3 months, transfer type impression with MyHealing and pick-up type impression with impression coping were performed twice in the same patients, and master models were fabricated. Customized prosthetic abutments (Myplant; Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea) were milled and connected to the master casts. Through a dental scanner (Scanner S600; Zirkonzahn, South Tyrol, Italy), the master casts were converted into virtual casts. The length and angulation differences between casts were measured using 3 dimentional analysis program (Geomagic Qualify 12; Geomagic, Morrisville, NC, USA). Statistical significance was calculated using Kruskal Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test (${\alpha}$=.05). Results: The length differences between the two systems were 0.032 mm in sagittal plane, and 0.029 in coronal plane, and 0.023 mm in horizontal plane. The angulation differences were $0.755^{\circ}$ in sagittal plane, and $1.275^{\circ}$ in coronal plane, and $0.420^{\circ}$ in horizontal plane. Conclusion: The accuracy of newly developed healing abutment system is similar to that of conventional pick-up impression. The new system can reduces chair time by not using separate impression coping.

A comparative study on the accuracy of impression body according to the types of impression tray (임플란트 인상 채득 시 트레이 종류에 따른 인상체의 정확도에 관한 비교 연구)

  • Yi, Hyun-Jung;Lim, Jong-Hwa;Lee, Joon-Seok
    • The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
    • /
    • v.48 no.1
    • /
    • pp.48-54
    • /
    • 2010
  • Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of impression body taking by the closed and the open tray impression technique with 3 types of impression tray. Individual tray, metal stock tray and polycarbonate tray were used. Materials and methods: Nine closed tray impressions were taken by individual tray, metal stock tray and polycarbonate stock tray, respectively with polyether impression material. 9 open tray impressions were also acquired by same manner. Precision analysis on the master models was performed by attaching the reference frameworks with alternate single screws and measuring the vertical fit discrepancy of respective analogues in working cast with a stereo microscope. Data were analyzed by 1 way ANOVA and independent t-test. Results: The average fit accuracy of impression bodies was calculated. With the closed tray impression technique, there were significant statistical differences in vertical fit discrepancy according to the types of tray. The individual tray group showed the lowest value and the polycarbonate stock tray group represented the highest. With the open tray impression technique, there was no significant difference in vertical fit discrepancy. Significant statistical difference in vertical fit discrepancy was found between the open and the closed impression technique with the polycarbonate stock tray. Conclusion: From the results above, more precise impressions could be acquired by the rigid individual tray compared with the polycarbonate stock tray. It was hard to get consistent accuracy impressions by the closed tray impression technique with polycarbonate stock trays.