• Title/Summary/Keyword: 연구 성과

Search Result 1,410, Processing Time 0.153 seconds

An Analysis on the Relation between Network Structure and Research Performance of Joint Researches in Accordance with the Matter of Supporting Research Funds: Focusing on the CT Area (연구비 지원 여부에 따른 공동연구의 네트워크구조와 연구성과 관계 분석: CT분야를 중심으로)

  • Kim, Minki;Kim, Donghyun;Cho, Keuntae
    • Journal of Technology Innovation
    • /
    • v.23 no.4
    • /
    • pp.63-87
    • /
    • 2015
  • As the important factors to improve research performance, the researchers' capacity and the input of resources like research funds have been pointed out. As joint researches are recently vitalized, however, the scientific knowledge is produced by forming continuous mutual relations through the structural characteristics between researchers. Since the support of research funds becomes a foothold to perform researches as multiple institutions cooperate with each other, it can be considered to have influence on research performance. In other words, it can be estimated that the support of research funds has influence on research performance by generating differences in the connecting structure of joint researches. In the results of analyzing the relation between network structure and research performance in accordance with the matter of supporting research funds, targeting the joint research theses in the culture technology(CT) area for five years from 2009 to 2013 in SCIE DB, when multiple research institutes are connected to each other, the number of thesis is increased. When the betweenness centrality is increased, the number of thesis is decreased. Also, the matter of supporting research funds has influence on network structure and research performance.

A Study of Metadata for Long-Term Preservation of Digital Research Outcome (디지털 연구성과물의 장기보존을 위한 메타데이터에 관한 연구)

  • Jang, Bo-Seong;Nam, Young-Joon
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.42 no.4
    • /
    • pp.281-309
    • /
    • 2011
  • This research designed and proposed metadata elements for the long-term preservation of digital research outcomes collected and managed in electronic file form. Metadata structure of both domestic and foreign agencies that manage research outcomes and CERIF and PREMIS-preserved preservation metadata were referred to design the metadata elements. The metadata design was divided into research information, bibliographic information and archival information. Research information is divided into project, name and institution, and composed of eight top-level elements and 29 sub-level elements. Bibliographic information is composed of 13 top-level elements as the source of research reports. Archival information is composed of 18 top-level elements and 62 sub-level elements as the elements for context, structure, contents and management process of the electronic records.

A Review of Declarations on Appropriate Research Evaluation for Exploring Their Applications to Research Evaluation System of Korea (연구성과평가 지침 리뷰 및 국내 적용 제안을 위한 고찰)

  • Yu, So-Young;Lee, Jae Yun;Chung, EunKyung;Lee, Boram
    • Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
    • /
    • v.32 no.4
    • /
    • pp.249-272
    • /
    • 2015
  • Inappropriate applications of bibliometric approach and misinterpretation on the analysis in research evaluation have been found and recognized nationally and internationally as the use of the approach has been rapidly adopted in various sectors in research evaluation systems and research funding agencies. The flood of misuse led to several numbers of declarations and statements on appropriate research evaluation, including Leiden Manifesto, DORA, IEEE Statement, etc. The similar recommendations from five different declarations, Leiden Manifest, IEEE Statement, DORA, Institut de France, and Thomson Reuters White paper were reviewed and meta-analyzed in this study and it is revealed that most of them emphasize evaluation on quality in various aspects with multiple indicators. Research evaluation with assessing multiple aspects of individual research based on the understandings of its purpose and pertinent subject area was revealed as being mostly advised in the declarations, and this recommendation can be regarded as being mostly requested in national research evaluation system. For future study, interviews with relevant stakeholders of national research evaluation system in order to explore its application are needed to confirm the findings of this review.

Comparative Study of National Science and Technology R&D Performance by Gender: Focusing on NTIS and Web of Science Data (성별에 따른 과학기술분야 국가 R&D 연구성과 분석: NTIS와 Web of Science 데이터를 중심으로)

  • Choi, Hyun-Jin;Yun, Bitnari;Park, Wan;Kwon, Oh-Jin
    • The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences
    • /
    • v.16 no.1
    • /
    • pp.165-174
    • /
    • 2021
  • The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in national R&D research outcomes in science and technology according to gender. For this purpose, the analysis was conducted by mapping WoS SCI(E) papers from 1990to 2018 and NTIS R&D papers from 2007 t0 2016. As a result of examining the differences in research achievements in science and technology according to gender based on three bibliometic indicators - average Times cited, Time-lag, and Impact factor - we found that the overall topography of research achievement was still male-centered, and the differences in the main research area between male and female were also very prominent. On the other hand, in top 10 research areas, it was confirmed that female researchers' outcomes were higher in the number of Times cited and Impact factor.

Comparative Analysis on the Relationships between the Centralities in Co-authorship Networks and Research Performance Considering the Number of Co-authors (공저자 수를 고려한 공저 네트워크 중심성과 연구성과의 연관성 분석)

  • Lee, Jae Yun
    • Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
    • /
    • v.33 no.4
    • /
    • pp.175-199
    • /
    • 2016
  • We analyzed the relationships between the co-authorship network centralities and the research performance indicators with the authors and the number of citations of the papers published for 10 years in Korean library and information science journals. In particular, the research performance indicators were calculated with normal counting and with fractional counting also. As a result of correlation analysis between the variables by setting the different ranges of the author groups to be analyzed according to the number of articles, it was possible to explain the inconsistent results of the previous studies on the correlations between the researchers' citation indicators and their co-authorship network centralities. Overall, the degree of co-authorship activities measured by collaboration coefficient showed no or negatively correlated with research performance. There were statistically significant positive correlations between the centralities and the research performance indicators, but the correlation was not significant in the analysis of the top 30 authors by number of articles.

A Model for the Development and Operation of Research Evaluation Services in Academic Libraries in Korea (국내 대학도서관 연구성과 서비스 개발 및 운영 모형 연구)

  • Kim, Soojung;Lee, Jae Yun;Lee, Ji-Won
    • Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
    • /
    • v.38 no.3
    • /
    • pp.287-309
    • /
    • 2021
  • This study describes the introduction, growth, current practices and future plans of research evaluation services performed in domestic academic libraries, with a view to informing other libraries considering similar endeavours. To that end, in-depth interviews were conducted with four librarians from academic libraries leading in research evaluation services. The contents of the interviews were grouped into five categories including growth, management, and services. The study found that their research evaluation services were launched around 2010 by demands of members of a university or as a library's initiative to expand the existing services for the purpose of enhancing the university's research competitiveness. The research evaluation services have been strengthened by extending the service scope and improving related systems. Also, the study suggests a comprehensive model that can guide the development and operation of research evaluation services.

Conceptual Design of Metadata based Research Results Information Retrieval System (메타데이터 기반의 연구성과정보 검색시스템의 개념적 설계)

  • Park, Dong-Jin;Lee, Sang-Tae;Choi, Ki-Suk
    • Journal of Information Management
    • /
    • v.37 no.2
    • /
    • pp.1-20
    • /
    • 2006
  • It has lately been recognized that the sharing and exchanging of the research results information is the critical factor to improve the research productivity. So many institutions are planning or developing the information systems which provide the research information services for researcher. But it has very difficulty in integrating the research resources information due to the dispersion and heterogeneity in data sources, and semantic and structural difference in describing data. We propose the semantic web based methodology and conceptual framework for raising the interoperability of metadata about research results information, which will support the integration of the distributed research data for information services in the end. We first introduce the ontology which is developed based on Standard Metadata of Research Results Information published by STISC. Then to show the applicability in real-world environment, we express the metadata of research information in RDF/RDFS according to ontology. Finally we proposed the conceptual architecture of research information service system which shows the main components, the functional requirements, and the principal and design direction at implementing the system.

A Study of the Factor of Humanities and Social Science based Convergence Research Performance (인문사회기반 융합연구 성과 영향요인 연구)

  • Noh, Younghee;Lee, Kwang Hee;Jeong, Dae Keun
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.18 no.6
    • /
    • pp.667-678
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of this study is to investigate empirically the factors affecting the research results of humanities and social sciences based convergence research. For this purpose, personal characteristics, research environment factor, researcher factor, research team factor, and support agency factor were set as influence factors of convergence research. Survey was conducted for researchers who are conducting research on humanities and social sciences based convergence research. As a result, it was found that factors influencing research on humanities and social sciences based convergence were researcher factor, supporting agency factor, research environment factor(major), and the influence of these factors on convergence research result was 51.6%. The implications of the research results are as follows: First, when performing the convergence research based on humanities and social science, individual factor of the researcher is more important than the factor of the research team in the performance of convergence research. Second, the support organization can improve the convergence research result through continuous management of convergence research results. Third, the research field (major) of the researcher also influences the performance of the convergence research. Therefore, the research field (major) should be considered important in the formation of the convergence research team.

An Analysis on the Social Diffusion of Geo-technologies Outcome : Comparison of Recognition between Experts and Nonexperts (지질자원기술 연구성과의 사회적 확산 분석 : 전문가와 비전문가의 인식 비교)

  • Kim, Chan-Souk;Lee, Hyun-Seon;Kim, Seong-Yong
    • Economic and Environmental Geology
    • /
    • v.45 no.3
    • /
    • pp.335-346
    • /
    • 2012
  • This study investigates the differences of recognition about geo-technologies outcome between experts and nonexperts. Based on these findings, this study would offer suggestions for future communication strategies on research outcome in a various field of scientific research as well as KIGAM. The result shows that there are differences between expert and nonexpert in the level of recognition about geoscience research outcome. The findings of this study emphasize the needs for recognizing the concept that geo-technologies are directly related to people's lives and external communication is necessary.

A Study on Communication Programs of Geo-Technology R&D Outcome Using the SMTCR Model (SMTCR 모델을 이용한 지질자원기술 연구성과 커뮤니케이션 방안 연구)

  • Kim, Chan-Souk;Kim, Seong-Yong
    • Economic and Environmental Geology
    • /
    • v.41 no.2
    • /
    • pp.267-273
    • /
    • 2008
  • This study was carried out to seek communication programs of geo-technology R&D outcome. For this, the following questions were set. 1) How much portion do KIGAM as the main body of geo-technology R&D among articles reported by major newspapers? 2) What are strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat factors of geo-technology R&D outcome from the communication view point? 3) What is the communication tasks and the communication ways for them? In conclusion, the communication programs of geo-technology R&D outcome using SMTCR(Sender-Message-Tool-Channel-Receiver) model were suggested.