DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Portfolio Advantages of Sukuk: Dynamic Correlations Between Bonds and Sukuk

  • ALFALAH, Abdullah (Economic and Finance Department, College of Business Administration, Gulf University for Science and Technology) ;
  • STEVENSON, Simon (Real Estate & Econ Development, Real Estate & Econ Development, Strome College of Business, Old Dominion University) ;
  • D'ARCY, Eamonn (International Real Estate, Henley Business School, University of Reading)
  • Received : 2021.12.15
  • Accepted : 2022.03.07
  • Published : 2022.04.30

Abstract

The growth of the Islamic finance sector has been well-documented. One of the most booming sectors has been Sukuk. According to several past studies, non-Islamic investors' interest in Sukuk is due, at least in part, to the diversification benefits that Sukuk provides in the context of a fixed-income portfolio. This paper compares a pair between Sukuk and Bonds in the Malaysian market issued by the same issuer to have an unbiased comparison. Using unconditional correlation methodology provides an initial examination of the relationship between the matched pairs. In addition, this paper adopts the standard GARCH-DCC approach of Engle (2002). This is a generalization of the Bollserslev (1990) GARCH model, allowing for the conditional correlation matrices to be time-varying. The findings reveal that the correlation between bonds and Sukuk is similar to that of bonds, making Sukuk a less appealing type of bond from a diversification standpoint. There are no significant differences between Sukuk and bonds. These finding questions the previously considered differences among different types of Sukuk and supports the argument that some Sukuk might not be compliant with Islamic rules and their structure, as contracts have the same risks for Sukuk holders regardless of the type of Sukuk.

Keywords

References

  1. Alam, N., Hassan, M. K., & Haque, M. A. (2013). Are Islamic bonds different from conventional bonds? International evidence from capital market tests. Borsa Istanbul Review, 13(3), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2013.10.006
  2. Ariff, M., & Safari, M. (2012). Are Sukuk securities the same as conventional bonds? Afro Eurasian Studies, 1(1), 101-125. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2117616
  3. Ariff, M., Safari, M., & Mohamed, S. (2013). Sukuk securities and conventional bonds: Evidence of significant differences. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 21(2), 621-638.
  4. Ashhari, Z., Chun, L., & Nassir, A. (2009). Conventional vs Islamic bond announcements: The effects on shareholders' wealth. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(6), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v4n6p105
  5. Aziz, T., Marwat, J., Zeeshan, A., Paracha, Y., & Alhaddad, L. (2021). Do Islamic Stock Markets diversify the financial uncertainty risk? Evidence from Selected Islamic countries. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(3), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.0031
  6. Bali, G., & Skinner, F. S. (2006). The original maturity of corporate bonds: The influence of credit rating, asset maturity, security, and macroeconomic conditions. Financial Review, 41(2), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2006.00138.x
  7. Basyariah, N., Kusuma, H., & Qizam, I. (2021). Determinants of Sukuk market development: Macroeconomic stability and institutional approach. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(2), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.14126/jafeb.2021.vol8.no2.0201
  8. Bollserslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
  9. Cakir, S., & Raei, F. (2007). Sukuk vs. Eurobonds: Is there a difference in value-at-risk? (IMF Working Paper no. 07/237). Washington DC: International Monetary Fund (IMF). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1087156
  10. Chong, J., Krystalogianni, A., & Stevenson, S. (2012). Dynamic correlations between REIT sub-sectors and the implications for diversification. Applied Financial Economics, 22(13), 1089-1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2011.639735
  11. Engle, R. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20(3), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102288618487
  12. Euroweek. (2004). Dubai Sells Record $1 billion 5yr Sukuk, Pakistan to follow. https://www.globalcapital.com/article/28mw8rgoosuiiw410ieww/dubai-sells-record-1bn-5yr-sukukpakistan-to-follow
  13. Euroweek. (2006). DP World's Nakheel Storms Markets with $3.5 billion Sukuk CB. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/dpworld-sells-%241.5-billion-in-perpetual-sukuk-document2020-06-24
  14. Fathurahman, H., & Fitriati, R. (2013). Comparative analysis of return on Sukuk and conventional bonds. American Journal of Economics, 3(3), 159-163. https://doi.org/10.5923.j.economics.20130303.05 https://doi.org/10.5923.j.economics.20130303.05
  15. Fahy, M. (2019). Global Sukuk market to hit $2.7trln by 2030: Franklin Templeton. Zawya. https://www.zawya.com/mena/en/markets/story/Global_sukuk_market_to_hit_27trln_by_2030_Franklin_Templeton-ZAWYA20190507054000/
  16. Forbes, K. J., & Rigobon, R. (2002). No contagion, only interdependence: Measuring stock market Comovements. Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2223-2261. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00494
  17. Godlewski, C. J., Turk-Ariss, R., & Weill, L. (2013). Sukuk vs. conventional Bonds: A stock market perspective. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(3), 745-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2013.02.006
  18. Hussain, M. M., Shahmoradi, A., & Turk, R. (2015). An overview of Islamic finance (IMF Working Paper No WP/15/120). Washington DC: International Monetary Fund (IMF). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793993316500034
  19. Jurado, K., Ludvigson, S. C., & Ng, S. (2015). Measuring uncertainty. American Economic Review, 105(3), 1177-1216. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20131193
  20. Latham & Watkins, (2014). Latham & Watkins advises on international 30 years sukuk issuance by Saudi electricity company. Latham & Watkins. https://www.lw.com/news/latham-advises-on-international-thirty-year-sukuk-issuanceby-saudi-electricity-company
  21. MEED. (2003a). Government to issue Debut Leasing Sukuk. https://www.meed.com/
  22. MEED. (2003b). Emaar gears up for Sukuk. https://www.meed.com/
  23. MEED. (2004). Roadshows launched for Durrat Sukuk. https://www.meed.com/
  24. MEED. (2007). Dar al-Arkan Sukuk closes massively oversubscribed. https://www.meed.com/
  25. Mosaid, F. E., & Boutti, R. (2014). Sukuk and bond performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(2), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v6n2p226
  26. Pyun, C. S., Lee, S. Y., & Nam, K. (2000). Volatility and information flow in emerging equity markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 9(4), 405-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-5219(00)00037-5
  27. Standard & Poor. (2013). Ratings direct: Investor appetite is pushing Sukuk into the mainstream.
  28. Thomson Reuters Zawya (2014). Sukuk Perceptions and Forecast Study. https://www.zawya.com/ifg-publications/ifgRegister/250914100032X/
  29. Vishwanath, S. R., & Azmi, S. (2009). An overview of Islamic Sukuk bonds. Journal of Structured Finance, 14(4), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.3905/JSF.2009.14.4.058
  30. Wong, M. C. S., & Bhatti, W. I. (2019). Developing international Sukuk in East Asia: Implications from Hong Kong Sukuk. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 6(4), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no4.9