DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validity and Reliability of New Digital Navicular Drop Test Equipment in Young People

  • Park, Jin-Seong (Daonwellness Corporation) ;
  • Park, Du-Jin (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan)
  • Received : 2020.11.30
  • Accepted : 2020.12.23
  • Published : 2021.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop new digital navicular drop test (ND-NDT) equipment and to determine its validity and reliability. Methods: A total of 24 healthy male and female adults, who fully understood the purpose of the study and gave consent to participate in the study, were selected as participants. The NDT and ND-NDT were conducted in the dominant foot of the participants in a random order. For the NDT, the position of the navicular bone was marked with a pen first; then, the height of the navicular bone from the ground was measured in both sitting and standing positions. For the ND-NDT, after the sticker-type reflection markers were attached to the position of the navicular bone, the height of the navicular bone from the ground was measured in both sitting and standing positions. To assess the validity of the diagnostic tests, the same examiner measured the height of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) three times in both the sitting and standing positions. To assess the inter-rater reliability of the ND-NDT, three examiners, in a random order, attached the sticker-type reflection markers to the position of the navicular bone and then measured the height of the MLA in both positions. Results: In the sitting position, the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between the two diagnostic tests was very high (r = 0.97) and statistically significant. In the standing position, the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between the two tests was 0.95, which was also statistically significant. The ICC2,1 values in the sitting and standing positions were 0.93 and 0.95, respectively, indicating significantly high inter-rater reliability. Conclusion: The ND-NDT equipment showed very high diagnostic validity, as well as excellent inter-rater reliability, indicating the clinical usefulness of the equipment as a diagnostic system for confirming pes planus.

Keywords

References

  1. Banwell HA, Mackintosh S, Thewlis D. Foot orthoses for adults with flexible pes planus: a systematic review. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 2014;7(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-7-23
  2. Brody DM. Techniques in the evaluation and treatment of the injured runner. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 1982;13(3):541-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(20)30252-2
  3. Chougala A, Phanse V, Khanna E, et al. Screening of body mass index and functional flatfoot in adult: an observational study. International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research. 2015;3(3):1037-1041.
  4. Christensen BH, Andersen KS, Pedersen KS, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of a novel method allowing for in-shoe measurement of navicular drop. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 2014;7(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-7-12
  5. Evans AM, Copper AW, Scharfbillig RW, et al. Reliability of the foot posture index and traditional measures of foot position. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2003;93(3):203-213. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-93-3-203
  6. Fiolkowski P, Brunt D, Bishop M, et al. Intrinsic pedal musculature support of the medial longitudinal arch: an electromyography study. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2003;42(6):327-333. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2003.10.003
  7. Jacob HA. Forces acting in the forefoot during normal gait-an estimate. Clinical Biomechanics. 2001;16(9):783-792. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00070-5
  8. Lange B, Chipchase L, Evans A. The effect of low-Dye taping on plantar pressures, during gait, in subjects with navicular drop exceeding 10 mm. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2004; 34(4):201-209. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2004.34.4.201
  9. Lundberg A, Svensson OK, Bylund C, et al. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex--Part 2: pronation and supination. Foot and Ankle. 1989;9(5):248-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110078900900508
  10. McPoil TG, Cornwall MW, Medoff L, et al. Arch height change during sit-to-stand: an alternative for the navicular drop test. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 2008;1(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-1-3
  11. McPoil TG, Cornwall MW. The relationship between static lower extremity measurements and rearfoot motion during walking. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 1996;24(5):309-314. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1996.24.5.309
  12. Menz HB, Dufour AB, Riskowski JL, et al. Association of planus foot posture and pronated foot function with foot pain: the Framingham foot study. Arthritis Care and Research. 2013;65(12):1991-1999. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22079
  13. Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: foundations for rehabilitation, 3rd ed. St. Louis. Mosby Elsevier. 2016.
  14. Queen RM, Mall NA, Hardaker WM, et al. Describing the medial longitudinal arch using footprint indices and a clinical grading system. Foot and Ankle International. 2007;28(4):456-462. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0456
  15. Vinicombe A, Raspovic A, Menz HB. Reliability of navicular displacement measurement as a clinical indicator of foot posture. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2001;91(5):262-268. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-91-5-262
  16. Williams DS 3rd, McClay IS, Hamill J. Arch structure and injury patterns in runners. Clinical Biomechanics. 2001;16(4):341-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00005-5
  17. Younger AS, Sawatzky B, Dryden P. Radiographic assessment of adult flatfoot. Foot and Ankle International. 2005;26(10):820-825. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070502601006