DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of the Gait Variable While Using Smartphones During Ramp Gait in Young Adults

젊은 성인에서 경사로 보행 시 스마트폰 사용이 보행 변수에 미치는 영향

  • Yoon, Chae-Hyo (Department of Physical Therapy, Pohang Semyung Christianity Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Bum-Su (Department of Physical Therapy, Good Yonsei Rehabilitation Clinic) ;
  • Kang, Do-Young (Department of Physical Therapy, Uiduk University) ;
  • Kim, Yeonseo (Department of Physical Therapy, Master Plus Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Myoung-Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, Uiduk University)
  • 윤채효 (포항세병기독병원) ;
  • 김범수 (굿연세재활의학과의원) ;
  • 강도영 (위덕대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 김연서 (마스터플러스병원) ;
  • 이명희 (위덕대학교 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2021.08.03
  • Accepted : 2021.08.05
  • Published : 2021.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate changes in gait variables depending on whether a task was performed using a smartphone while walking on a ramp. Methods: The participants of this study were 41 college students attending U University located in Gyeongju City, Gyeongsangbuk-do. In this study, gait variables were measured during ramp gait while using a smartphone to perform a task and during ramp gait without performing such tasks. In other words, four walking conditions were used: 1) walking up a ramp, 2) walking up a ramp while using a smartphone to perform a task, 3) walking down a ramp, and 4) walking down a ramp while using a smart phone to perform a task. Gait variables were measured using a gait analysis tool (Legsys; BioSensics, USA), and stride time, stride length, stride velocity, cadence, and double support were analyzed. The order of measurements was randomized to control for order effects due to repeated measurements. Results: The comparative analysis of gait variables according to the presence or absence of smartphone use during ramp gait showed that there were significant differences in stride time, stride length, and stride velocity during both ramp ascent and ramp descent (p < 0.05). In both ramp ascent and ramp descent, stride time increased when walking using a smartphone, compared to when walking without using a smartphone (p < 0.05). However, in both ramp ascent and ramp descent, stride length and stride velocity were decreased when walking using a smartphone compared to when walking without using a smartphone (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The study results showed that the use of a smartphone during walking can affect safety. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the awareness of risks associated with walking while using a smartphone, and further research needs to be conducted in various environments and with different ramps.

Keywords

References

  1. Agostini V, Fermo LF, Massazza G, et al. Does texting while walking really affect gait in young adults? Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2015; 12(1):86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0079-4
  2. Alcock L, Galna B, Lord S, et al. Characterisation of foot clearance during gait in people with early Parkinson' s disease: Deficits associated with a dual task. Journal of biomechanics. 2016;49 (13):2763-2769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.06.007
  3. Choi JS. Effects of cognitive task on stride rate variability by walking speeds. Journal of Biomedical Engineering Research. 2006;27(6):323-331.
  4. Han JT, Cho JS, Bae SS. The spatio-temporal analysis of gait characteristics during ramp ascent and descent at different inclinations. The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy. 2006;18(1):95-106.
  5. Han JT, Hwangbo G. Kinematic analysis of lower extremities during stairs and ramp climbing with older adults. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2009;19(3): 435-448. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2009.19.3.435
  6. Hyman IE, Boss SM, Wise BM, et al. Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2010;24(5):597-607.
  7. Jeon SY, Kim CR, Song HS, et al. Changes in gait pattern during multitask using smartphones. Journal of Impacting the World of Science Press. 2016;53(2): 241-247.
  8. Kim HD. The effect of obstacle height on balance control while stepping over an obstacle from a position of quiet stance in older adults. Journal of Korean Society of Physical Therapy. 2009;21(3):75-80.
  9. Kim K, Seo SK, Yoon HJ, et al. Correlations between muscle strength of the ankle and balance and walking in the elderly. Journal of Korean Society of Physical Therapy. 2008;20(1):33-40.
  10. Kim SH. A comparison of spatio-temporal gait parameters according to smart phone use posture in healthy people. Gachon University. Dissertation of Master's Degree. 2017.
  11. Lamberg EM, Muratori LM. Cell phones change the way we walk. Journal of Gait & Posture. 2012; 35(4): 688-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.005
  12. Lee HN. Clinical application of gait analysis system using a wireless attachable three-axes gyroscope sensor (gait analysis in vestibular neuritis patients). Pusan University. Dissertation of Doctorate Degree. 2013.
  13. Licence S, Smith R, McGuigan MP, et al. Gait pattern alterations during walking, texting and walking and texting during cognitively distractive tasks while negotiating common pedestrian obstacles. Journal of Public Library of Science One. 2015;10(7):1-11.
  14. Ojha HA, Kern RW, Lin SHJ, et al. Age affects the attentional demands of stair ambulation: evidence from a dual-task approach. Journal of American Physical Therapy Association. 2009;89(10):1080-1088.
  15. Park CB. A Comparative analysis of preference for pedestrian ramp on recommended angle of slop and stairs. Architectural research. 2019;35(3):59-66.
  16. Rami H, Megan E, Sharpe S, et al. Texting during stair negotiation and implications for fall risk. Journal of Gait & Posture. 2017;58(1):409-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.09.004
  17. Redfern MS, Dipasquale J. Biomechanics of descending ramps. Journal of Gait & Posture. 1997;6(2):119-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(97)01117-X
  18. St George RJ, Fitzpatrick RC, The sense of self-motion, orientation and balance explored by vestibular stimulation. Journal of The Physiological. 2010; 589(4):807-813. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2010.197665
  19. Verghese J, Holtzer R, Lipton RB, et al. Quantitative gait markers and incident fall risk in older adults. Journal of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences. 2009;64(8):896-901. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glp033
  20. Yahya EA, Dawes H, Smith L, et al. Cognitive motor interference while walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2011;35(3):715-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.008
  21. Yoon NS, Lee KO, Kim JY. Kinematic comparison of walking on various inclined walkways. Journal of Korean Physical Education Association for Girls and Women. 1998;13(1):89-101.
  22. Yu KH, Shim JH, Choung SD, et al. Effect of using a cell phone on gait parameters in healthy young adults: texting and texting while listening to music. Journal of Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2015; 10(4):25-31.