DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Distribution of Authorities and Responsibilities to Appraise Records of Central or Federal Governments in Britain, the USA, Canada, and Australia

국가기록평가의 권한과 책임 분석: 영국, 미국, 캐나다, 호주 중앙 및 연방정부 기록의 평가를 중심으로

  • 현문수 (충남대학교 대학원 기록학과)
  • Received : 2019.10.30
  • Accepted : 2019.11.11
  • Published : 2019.11.30

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the distribution of authorities and responsibilities (ARs) to appraise public records, especially between national archives and central or federal government institutions. For this study, archives acts and policies of Britain, the USA, Canada, and Australia were selected for analysis. After attempts in reviewing the laws and policies governing ARs of appraisal and disposition, their level of concentration were investigated and compared. The analysis shows that the ARs to determine and approve which records have archival value and what are to be transferred to archives are mainly located in the national archives. In comparison, it is common that the national archives and government institutions share ARs in identifying the public records and in preparing and approving the disposal authorities. Furthermore, it identifies that the ARs can be distinguished by individual appraisal activities and expects to be used to discuss the ARs to appraise public records in Korea.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Kim, M. (2008). A study on reconstructing archival appraisal regime of foreign countries in electronic records environments: Focusing on archival appraisal strategies in a national point of views. Journal of Information Management, 39(2), 95-130. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2008.39.2.095 https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2008.39.2.095
  2. Kim, M. (2009). Analysis of improvement directions on the current appraisal system of public records in electronic record environments: Focusing on appraisal methods and appraisal system. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 19, 103-151.
  3. Seo, E. (2005). A comparative study on appraisal policies of national archives of UK, USA, Canada, and Australia. Journal of Information Management, 36(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2005.36.4.001 https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2005.36.4.001
  4. Seol, M. (2018). Redesigning archival appraisal policies for improving accountability of public bodies. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 55, 5-38. http://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2018.55.005 https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2018.55.005
  5. Lee, K. (2019). The distribution of responsibility and authority upon public records appraisal: Focused on 'citizen participation appraisal'. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 60, 49-88. http://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.60.049 https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.60.049
  6. Lee, S. (2005). Analysing archival appraisal and selection decision: Theoretic approach. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 12, 37-80.
  7. Lee, S. (2018). Archival appraisal and selection: How to select the records for permanent preservation? In Korean Society of Archives & Records Management (Eds), Records & Archives Management: Theory & Practice (pp. 175-216). Seoul: Joeungeulteo.
  8. Choi, J. (2014). A survey on archival appraisal system and practice in Korea as well as its modification. Journal of Korean Society of Archives & Records Management, 14(4), 153-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.4.153 https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.4.153
  9. Choi, J. (2017). Historical transition in the public records selection system and its meaning in Britain. The Korean History Education Review, 141, 35-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.18622/kher.2017.03.141.35 https://doi.org/10.18622/kher.2017.03.141.35
  10. Korea Society of Archival Studies (2008). Dictionary of Records & Archival Terminology. Seoul: Yuksabipyoungsa.
  11. Bauer, G. P. (1946). The appraisal of current and recent records. The National Archives Staff Information Circulars, 13, Retrived November 19, 2019, from https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.a0011378106&view=1up&seq=1
  12. Brooks, P. C. (1940). The selection of records for preservation. American Archivist, 3(4), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.3.4.u77415458gu22n65
  13. Quoted in Couture, C. (2005). Archival appraisal: A status report. Archivaria, 59, 83-107.
  14. Cook, T. (2011). 'We are what we keep; We keep what we are': Archival appraisal past, present and future. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 32(2), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2011.619688 https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2011.619688
  15. Couture, C. (2005). Archival appraisal: A status report. Archivaria, 59, 83-107.
  16. ISO (2016). ISO 15489-1: Information and documentation-Records management-Part 1: Concepts and principles.
  17. Kolsrud, O. (1992). The evolution of basic appraisal principles - Some comparative observation. American Archivist, 55(1), 26-39. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.55.1.v05w2kg671667v6h https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.55.1.v05w2kg671667v6h
  18. LAC (2001a). Appraisal methodology: Macro-appraisal and functional analysis-Part A: Concepts and theory. Retrieved June 13. 2019, from https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/services/government-information-resources/disposition/Documents/MacroappraisalPartA.pdf
  19. LAC (2001b). Preserving the archival and historical memory of government. Retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/services/government-information-resources/disposition/Documents/PreservingMemory.pdf
  20. LAC (2017a). A brief history of the LAC macroappraisal methodology for government records. Retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/services/government-information-resources/disposition/Pages/macroappraisal-methodology.aspx
  21. LAC (2017b). Government records disposition: Frequently asked questions(FAQs). Retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/services/government-information-resources/disposition/Pages/faq.aspx
  22. LAC (2017c). Procedures for the transfer of unpublished information resources of enduring value from Government of Canada institutions to Library and Archives Canada. Retrieved July 1, 2019, from http://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/services/government-information-resources/disposition/Pages/procedures-transfer-procedures.aspx
  23. LAC (2019). The government records disposition program of Library and Archives Canada: Program synopsis. Retrieved June 12, 2019, from https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/services/government-information-resources/disposition/Pages/program-synopsis.aspx
  24. Ling, T. (2001). The Commonwealth's first Archives Bill 1927. Archives and Manuscripts, 29, 98-109.
  25. Marshall, J. A. (2006). Accounting for disposition: A comparative case study of appraisal documentation at the national archives and records administration in the United States, Library and Archives Canada, and the National Archives of Australia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/6251
  26. NAA (2005). What we keep: Principles for selecting the Australian Government's national archives. Retrieved July 2, 2019, from http://www.naa.gov.au/Images/what-we-keep_tcm16-88809.pdf
  27. NAA (2019). Developing a records authority. Retrieved October 17, 2019, from https://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/records-authorities/developing-records-authority
  28. NAA (n.d.a). Establishing an information governance committee. Retrieved from October 17, 2019, from https://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/information-governance/establishing-information-governance-framework/establishing-information-governance-committee
  29. NAA (n.d.b). Responsibilities of the National Archives and australian government agencies. Retrieved October 17, 2019, from https://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/information-governance/responsibilities-national-archives-and-australian-government-agencies
  30. NAA (n.d.c). Transferring to the Archives. Retrieved July 20, 2019, from https://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/dispose-information/transferring-information/transferring-information-national-archives
  31. NARA (2007). Strategic directions:Appraisal policy. Retrieved July 3, 2019, from https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/initiatives/appraisal.html
  32. President of the Treasury Board (2017). Directive on recordkeeping. Retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=16552
  33. Smith, C. (1980). The Australian archives. Archives and Manuscripts, 8(1), 33-40.
  34. TNA (2012a). Appraisal policy. Retrieved June 9, 2019, from https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/appraisal_policy.pdf
  35. TNA (2012b). Disposal scheduling. Retrieved June 9, 2019, from http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/sched_disposal.pdf
  36. TNA (2012c). Records collection policy. Retrieved June 9, 2019, from http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/records-collection-policy-2012.pdf
  37. TNA (2013). Best practice guide to appraising and selecting records for The National Archives. Retrieved June 9, 2019, from https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/best-practice-guide-appraising-and-selecting.pdf
  38. TNA (n.d.a). History of the Public Records Acts. Retrieved May 28, 2019, http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/public-records-act/history-of-pra/
  39. TNA (n.d.b). The public records system. Retrieved May 28, 2019, from http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/public-records-act/public-records-system/
  40. TNA Appraisal Project Board (2004). The National Archives appsaisal polocy background paper - The 'Grigg system' and beyond. Retrieved May 28, 2019, from http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/background_appraisal.pdf
  41. Williams, C. (2006). Studying reality: The application of theory in an aspect of UK practice. Archivaria, 62, Fall, 83-101.
  42. Marshall, J. A. (2006). Accounting for disposition (pp.144-145).