DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Social Capital within and outside the Team on the R&D Performance: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing

팀 내외의 사회적 자본이 R&D 성과에 미치는 영향: 지식공유의 매개효과

  • 황호민 (한국기술교육대학교 산업경영학부) ;
  • 이상곤 (한국기술교육대학교 산업경영학부)
  • Received : 2019.07.29
  • Accepted : 2019.09.06
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

This study explores the role of knowledge sharing between their social capital and performance in R&D setting. R&D environment is composed of experts from various domains with different backgrounds, such as technologies and experiences. Thus, increasing team social capital and enhancing knowledge sharing are critical for R&D performance. Social capital and Knowledge sharing are classified into two : Social capital and Knowledge sharing within/outside team. A empirical study was conducted at a research institute of large company that leads the advanced research and development of the domestic chemical industry. Data was collected 292 copies out of 500 copies (Response rate 58.4%). The result indicated that both social capital within and outside team had a positive effect on R&D Performance. Social capital within team had a significant impact on knowledge sharing within the team only, and social capital outside team had a significant effect on knowledge sharing outside the team only. Only knowledge sharing outside the team had a positive effect on R&D Performance and the mediating role of knowledge sharing was acquired for social capital outside team and R&D Performance only. From these key findings, this study suggests that, within the team, social capital alone can achieve results, but outside the team, it is necessary that not only social capital but also knowledge sharing are needed in order to achieve results.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국기술교육대학교

References

  1. 권엽, 김규정 2002. "종업원의 감정반응, 애착행위, 지식공유 및 신제품 혁신성간의 상호작용에 관한 연구," 경영학연구 (41:5), pp. 1036-1068.
  2. 김병수, 한인구 2012. "R&D 조직의 지식 경영 활동이 R&D 성과에 미치는 영향," 지식경영연구 (13:1), pp. 25-39.
  3. 김원표 2017. 다시 쓰는 통계분석 : 구조방정식 모델분석, 와이즈인컴퍼니.
  4. 김효준, 곽기영 2013. "스마트워크 환경에서 트랜잭티브 메모리 역량의 역할에 관한 연구," 한국정보시스템학회 춘계학술대회 논문집.
  5. 박원우, 김미숙, 정상명, 허규만 2007. "동일방법편의(Common Method Bias)의 원인과 해결방안," 인사.조직연구 (15:1), pp. 89-133.
  6. 이건창, 정남호 2002. "기업내 개인차원에서의 지식순환과정과 지식경영 효율성간의 관계에 관한 연구," 지식경영연구 (3:2), pp. 31-48.
  7. 이정민, 곽기영 2012. "소셜 미디어 환경에서 테르티우스 융겐스 성향이 개인의 직무성과에 미치는 영향," 경영학연구 (41:5), pp. 1253-1284.
  8. 진대선 2007. "개인과 집단의 지식경영 활동이 선행요인과 결과에 관한 연구," 숭실대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
  9. 최종민 2010. "지식경영 과정들에 대한 사회적 자본, 원가기획시스템과 정보기술 하부구조의 영향," 한국경영과학회지 (35:2), pp. 89-114.
  10. 허문구 2011. "사회적 자본이 지식창출과 혁신에 미치는 영향," 인사.조직연구 (19:1), pp. 41-78.
  11. Adler, P. S., and Kwon, S. W. 2002. "Social Capital : Prospects for A New Concept," Academy of Management Review (27:1), pp. 17-40. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.5922314
  12. Adler, T. R., and Zirger, B. J. 1998. "Organizational learning: Implications of a virtual research and development organization," Amer. Bus. Rev. (16), pp. 51-60.
  13. Allen, T. J. 1977. Managing the Flow of Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  14. Argote, L., and Ingram, P. 2000. "Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (82:1), pp. 150-169. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893
  15. Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., and Lee, J. N. 2001. "Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing : examining the Roles of extrinsc motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate," MIS Quarterly (29:1), pp. 87-111.
  16. Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., and Bloodgood, J. M. 2002. "Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations," Academy of Management Review (27), pp. 505-522. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.7566023
  17. Boone. 1997. Managing intracor porate knowledge sharing, Delft: Eburon.
  18. Bouty, I. 2000. "Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries," Acad. Manage. J. (43), pp. 50-65.
  19. Burt, R. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
  20. Carnevale, P. J., and Probst, T. M. 1998. "Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (74), pp. 1300-1309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1300
  21. Chakravarthy, B., Zaheer, A., and Zaheer, S. 1999. "Knowledge sharing in organizations: A field study," Organization Science Research Workshop on Knowledge Management.
  22. Chan, Wai. 2007. "Comparing Indirect Effects in SEM: A Sequential Model Fitting Method Using Covariance-Equivalent Specifications," A Multidisciplinary Journal (14:2), pp. 326-346.
  23. Chen, M. H., Chang, Y. C., and Hung, S. C. 2008. "Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams," R&D Management (38:1), pp. 21-34.
  24. Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., and Wang, Eric, T. G. 2006. "Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories," Decision Support Systems (42:3), pp. 1872-1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
  25. Chow, W. S., and Chan, L. S. 2008. "Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing," Information & Management (45:7), pp. 458-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.06.007
  26. Clark, K. B., and Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product Development Performa nce: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World, Auto Industry. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  27. Cohen, D., and Prusak, L. 2001. In Good Compa ny: How Socia l Capita l Ma kes Organizations Work, Harvard Business School Press.
  28. Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  29. Crawford, A. B. 1982. "Corporate Electronic Mail: A Communication-Intensive Application of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly (6:3), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.2307/248652
  30. Cummings, J. 2004. "Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization," Management Science (50:3), pp. 352-364. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134
  31. Cummings, J. L., and Teng, B. S. 2003. "Transferring R&D Knowledge: The Key Factors A ffecting K nowledge Transfer Success," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (20:1-2), pp. 39-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(03)00004-3
  32. Dakhli, M., and De Clercq, D. 2004. "Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study," Entrepreneurship and Regional Development (16), pp. 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620410001677835
  33. Daud, S., and Yusoff, W. F. W. 2010. "Knowledge Management and firm performance in SMEs: The role of social capital as a mediating variable," Asian Academy of Management Journal (15:2), pp. 135-155.
  34. Davenport, T. H., and Prusak, L. 1998. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Boston, MA: Harvard Bus. Sch. Press.
  35. De Dreu, C. K. W., and West, M. A. 2001. "Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making," Journal of Applied Psychology (86), pp. 1191-1201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191
  36. De Meyer, A. 1991. "Tech talk: How managers are stimulating global R&D communication," Sloan Manage. Rev. (32), pp. 49-58.
  37. Dhanaraj, C., Lyles, M. A., Steensma, H. K., and Tihanyi, L. 2004. "Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance," Journal of International Business Studies (35), pp. 428-442. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400098
  38. Ein-Dor, P., and Segev, E. 1978. "Organizational Context and the Success of Management Information Systems," Management Science (24:10), pp. 1064-1077. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.10.1064
  39. Farris, G. F. 1969. "Some antecedents and consequences of scientific performance," IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage (16), pp. 9-16.
  40. Granovetter, M. 1973. "The strength of weak ties," Amer. J. Sociology (6), pp. 1360-1380.
  41. Guental, H. G., and Stone, E. F. 1984. "On the Premature Death of Need-Satisfaction Models: An Investigtion of Salancik and Pfefffer's Views on Priming and Consistency Artifacts," Journal of Management (10), pp. 237-258.
  42. Gupta, A. K., Wilemon, D., and Atuahene-Gima, K. 2000. "Excelling in R&D," Res. Technol. Manage (43), pp. 52-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2000.11671358
  43. Hansen, M. T. 2002. "Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies," Organization Science (13:3), pp. 232-248. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.232.2771
  44. Harris, R. C., and Lambert, J. T. 1998. "Building effective R&D teams: The senior manager's role," Res. Technol. Manage (41), pp. 28-35.
  45. Harrison, D. A., and McLaughlin, M. E. 1993. "Cognitive processes in self-report responses: Tests of item context effects in work attitude measures," Journal of Applied Psychology (78), pp. 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.129
  46. Huang, C. C., Chin, H., and Jiang, P. C. 2008. "Knowledge Sharing and Performance in Technology R&D Teams: A Mediated Effect of Knowledge Integration," Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT 2008. 4th IEEE International Conference on, pp. 1461-1466.
  47. Igbaria, M., and Tan, M. 1997. "The Consequences of the Information Technology Acceptance on Subsequent Indiv idual Perfomance," Information and Management (32:3), pp. 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00006-2
  48. Inkpen, A.C. and Tsang, E.W.K. 2005. "Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer," Academy of Management Review (30), pp. 146-165. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.15281445
  49. Janz, B. D., Colquitt, J. A., and Noe, R. A. 1997. "Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables," Pers. Psychol (50), pp. 877-904. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb01486.x
  50. Jarvenpaa, S. L., and Leidner, D. E. 1999. "Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams, Organization Science," Organization science (10:6), pp. 791-815. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791
  51. Jassawalla, A. R., and Sashittal, H. C. 2000. "Cross-functional dynamics in new product development," Res. Technol. Manage (43), pp. 46-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2000.11671331
  52. Jehn, K. A. 1995. "A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict," Administrative Science Quarterly (40), pp. 256-282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638
  53. Kemper, J., Schilke, O., and Brettel, M. 2013. "Social Capital as a Microlevel Origin of Organizational Capabilities," J PROD INNOV MANAG (30:3), pp. 589-603. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12004
  54. Kim, W. C., and Mauborgne, R. A. 1997. "Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy," Harvard Business Review (75:4), pp. 65-75.
  55. Klimstra, P. D., and Potts, J. 1988. "Managing R&D projects," Res. Technol. Manage (31), pp. 23-39.
  56. Kramer, N. 1996. "The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationship," Harvard Business Review, pp. 92-106.
  57. Larson, A. 1992. "Network dyadsin entrepre neurial settings : astudy of governance of exchange relationships," Administrative Science Quarterly (37:1), pp. 76-104. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393534
  58. Lee, S. H., Wong, P. K., and Chong, C. L. 2005. "Human and Social Capital Explanations for R&D Outcomes," IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (52:1), pp. 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2004.839955
  59. Leonard, D., and Sensiper, S. 1998. "The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation," Calif. Manage. Rev (40), pp. 112-132.7 https://doi.org/10.2307/41165946
  60. Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge, Boston, MA: Harvard Bus. Sch. Press.
  61. Levesque, L. L., Wilson, J. M., and Wholey, D. R. 2001. "Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development project teams," J. Org. Behav. (22), pp. 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.87
  62. Liang, D.W., Moreland, R.L., and Argote, L. 1995. "Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (21), pp. 384-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295214009
  63. Liao, J., and Welsch, H. 2003. "Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: a comparison of technology- and nontechnology-based nascent entrepreneurs," Journal of High-Technology Management Research (14), pp. 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(03)00009-9
  64. Madhavan, R., and Grover, R. 1998. "From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management," J. Market (62), pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200301
  65. Mascitelli, R. 2000. "From experience: Harnessing tacit knowledge to achieve breakthrough innovation," J. Prod. Innov. Manage (17), pp. 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1730179
  66. McFadyen, M. A., and Cannella Jr, A. A. 2004. "Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships," Academy of Management Journal (47:5), pp. 735-746. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159615
  67. Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. 1998. "Social Capital, intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage," Academy of Management Review (23:2), pp. 242-266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
  68. Nelson, K. M., and Cooprider, J. G. 1996. "The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance," MIS Quarterly (20:4), pp. 409-432. https://doi.org/10.2307/249562
  69. Nonaka. I., and Konno, N. 1998. "The Concept of Ba: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation," California Management Review (40:3), pp. 40-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165942
  70. Pan, S. L., and Scarbrough, H. 1999. "Knowledge management in practice: An exploratory case study," Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage (11), pp.359-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/095373299107401
  71. Parikh, M. 2001. "Knowledge management framework for high-tech research and development," Eng. Manage. J (13), pp. 27-33.
  72. Pee, L.G., Kankanhalli, A., and Kim, H.W. 2010. "Knowledge Sharing in Information Systems Development : A Social Interdependence Perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Systems (11:10), pp. 550-575. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00238
  73. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., and Xin, K. R. 1999. "Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance," Administrative Science Quarterly (44), pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667029
  74. Pelz, D. C., and Andrews, F. M. 1976. Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development, revised ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inst. Soc. Res.
  75. Pitt, M., and Clarke, K. 1999. "Competing on competence: A knowledge perspective on he management of strategic innovation," Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage (11:3), pp. 301-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/095373299107375
  76. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. "Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies," Journal of Applied Psychology (988:5), pp. 879-903.
  77. Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension, London, U.K.: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  78. Reagans, R., and Zuckerman, E. W. 2001. "Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams," Org. Sci (12), pp. 502-517. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.502.10637
  79. Reid, F. 2003. "Creating a knowledge sharing culture among diverse business units," Employment Relations Today (30:3), pp.43-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/ert.10097
  80. Rickards, T., Chen, M.-H. and Moger, S. 2001, "Development of a self-report instrument for exploring team factor, leadership and performance relationship". British Journal of Management (12), pp. 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00197
  81. Rico, R., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., and Gibson, C. 2008, "Team Implicit Coordination Processes: A Team Knowle dge-Based Approach," The Academy of Management Review (33:1), pp. 163-184. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.27751276
  82. Ring, P. S., and Van De Ven, A. 1994. "Development processes of cooperative interorganizational rel ationships," Academy of Management Review (19:1), pp. 90-118. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9410122009
  83. Rouse, W. B., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., and Salas, E. 1992. "The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern (22:6), pp. 1296-1308. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.199457
  84. Scott, S. G. and Bruce, R. A. 1994. "Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace," The Academy of Management Journal (37:3), pp. 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  85. Sethi, R., and Nicholson, C. Y. 2001. "Structural and contextual correlates of charged behavior in product development teams," J. Prod. Innov. Manage (18), pp. 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1830154
  86. Shaw, M. E. 1981. Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior, New York, McGraw-Hill
  87. Shrout, P. E., and Bolger, N. 2002. "Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New recommendations," Psychological Methods (7), pp. 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
  88. Simons, T., and Peterson, R. 2000. "Task conf lict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust," Journal of Applied Psychology (85), pp. 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
  89. Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., and Kraimer, M. L. 2001. "Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups," Acad. Manage. J (44), pp. 316-325.
  90. Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D., and Wittenbaum, G. W. 1995. "Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (31), pp. 244-265. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1012
  91. Stein, B. S. 1989. Memory and Creativity, J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning and C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity, New York,
  92. Trust in Organization", Genetic Social and General Psychology Mongraphs (126:2), pp. 241-260
  93. Stewart, G. L., and Barrick, M. R. 2000. "Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type," Acad. Manage. J (43), pp. 135-148.
  94. Thamhain, H. J., and Wilemon, D. L. 1975. "Conflict management in project life cycles," Sloan Management Review (16), pp. 31-50.
  95. Tsai, W. 2002. "Social structure of "coopetition" within a multiunit organization: Coordination and introrganizational knowledge sharing," Organization Science (13:2), pp. 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536
  96. Tsai, W., and Ghoshal, S. 1998. "Social Capital and Value Creation : The Role of Intrafirm Networks," Academy of Management Journal (41:4), pp. 464-476. https://doi.org/10.2307/257085
  97. Van Aken, J. E., and Weggeman, M. P. 2000. "Managing learning in informal innovation networks: Overcoming the Daphne-dilemma," R&D Manage (30), pp. 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00164
  98. Wegner, D. M. 1986. "Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind," Theories of Group Behavior, pp. 185-208.
  99. West, M. A., and Anderson, N. R. 1996. "Innovation in top management groups," Journal of Applied Psychology (81), pp. 680-693. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680
  100. Zander, U., and Kogut, B. 1995. "knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizatiobal Capabilities; An Empirical Test," Organization Science (6:2), pp. 76-92. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.76