Assessment of National and Regional Plans Using Integrated Management Index of Korea National Planning and Environmental Planning for Present Status Evaluation

국토계획과 환경계획 통합관리 지표의 적용을 통한 통합관리 현황 평가

  • Heo, Han-Kyul (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Kun (Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural System Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Sung, Hyun-Chan (Environmental GIS/RS center, Korea University) ;
  • Heo, Min-Ju (Department of architectural engineering, KOREA RAILROAD) ;
  • Park, Jin-Han (Local Autonomy Research Center, Dept. of Urban management research, The Seoul Institute & Policy Inspection Team, Planning and Budget Division, Eunpyeong-gu Office, Seoul Metropolitan Government.)
  • 허한결 (서울대학교 협동과정조경학 전공) ;
  • 이동근 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 조경지역시스템공학부) ;
  • 성현찬 (고려대학교 환경GIS/RS센터) ;
  • 허민주 (한국철도공사 영등포건축사업소) ;
  • 박진한 (서울연구원 도시경영연구실 구정연구지원센터, 서울특별시 은평구청 기획예산과 은평정책연구단)
  • Received : 2019.08.16
  • Accepted : 2019.08.27
  • Published : 2019.08.31


Integrated management of Korea national and environmental planing for sustainable development is suggested, and basic research is needed. In this study, national and regional plans were assessed using 'integrated management index of Korea national planning and environmental planning' to grasp the current status of integrated management on Korea national planning and environmental planning. As a result of the assessment, it was found that both national and regional plans need to improve considering the natural ecology part and water resource and quality part. In addition, it was derived that the detailed contents of the indicator can not be reflected according to the characteristics in the higher-level plan. Therefore, it has been found necessary to include proclamatory contents so as to be able to establish a detailed plan that reflects environmental goals in the lower-level plan.


Supported by : 한국환경정책.평가연구원(KEI)


  1. Cho, D.H. and Bae, M.K. 2004. A Study on the Decision of Priority Ranking of Environ-mental Policy Implementation Based on Importance-Achievement Analysis. Journal of Korea Planning Association 39(4): 129-145.(In Korean)
  2. Heo, H.K. Sung, H.C. Lee, D.K. Heo, M.J. and Park, J.H. 2018. A Study on Assessment Indicators for Integrated Management on Korea National Planning and Environmental Planning. Journal of Korean Environmental Restoration Technology. 21(3):27-45.(In Korean)
  3. Kang, S.M. and Kim, M. S. 2000. Environmental Indices and Development of Index System. The Korea Spatial Planning Review 30: 21-49.(In Korean)
  4. Kim, E. Jeon, S.W. Song, W. Kwak, J. Lee, J. 2012. Application of ECVAM as a Indicator for Monitoring National Environment in Korea. Korea Environment Institute. 11(2): 3-16.(In Korean)
  5. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation, 2018, Joint Order on Integrated Management of National Land Plans and Environmental Conservation Plans. Korean)
  6. Lee, D.K. and Youn, S.W. 1998. A study on Environmental Indicators for Sustainable City Development -The case of Coexistent Indicators between Men and Nature. Journal of environmental impact assessment 7(1): 93-107.(In Korean)
  7. Ministry of Environment. 2016a. Comprehensive Plan for National Environment.(In Korean)
  8. Ministry of Environment. 2016b. Basic Plan for Sustainable Development.(In Korean)
  9. Ministry of Environment. 2017. A study on development of evaluation indicators for the development-environmental plan linkage system.(In Korean)
  10. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2011. Comprehensive Plan for National Land.(In Korean)
  11. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2012. Comprehensive Plan for Chungcheongnam-do.(In Korean)
  12. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2013. A Study on Strengthen Linkage Between Korea National Planning and Environmental Planning.(In Korean)
  13. National Institute of Environmental Research, 2015, Study on urban spatial environmental planning preparing linkage policy of land planning and environmental planning(II).(In Korean)