DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship of the Shape of Subacromial Spur and Rotator Cuff Partial Thickness Tear

Kim, Young-Kyu;Jung, Kyu-Hak;Kang, Suk-Woong;Hong, Jin-Hun;Choi, Ki-Yong;Choi, Ji-Uk

  • Received : 2019.04.18
  • Accepted : 2019.08.04
  • Published : 2019.09.01

Abstract

Background: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the relationship between location of the rotator cuff tear and shape of the subacromial spur. Methods: Totally, 80 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for partial thickness rotator cuff tear were enrolled for the study. Bigliani's type of the acromion, type of subacromial spur, and location of partial thickness tear of the rotator cuff were evaluated using plain X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging. We then compared the groups of no spur with spur, and heel with traction spur. Results: Of the 80 cases, 25 cases comprised the no spur group, and 55 cases comprised the spur group. There was a significant difference in type of tear (p=0.0004) between these two groups. Bursal side tears were significantly greater (odds ratio=6.000, p=0.0007) in the spur group. Subjects belonging to the spur group were further divided into heel (38 cases) and traction spur (17 cases). Comparing these two groups revealed significant differences only in the type of tear (p=0.0001). Furthermore, the heel spur had significantly greater bursal side tear (odds ratio=29.521, p=0.0005) as compared to traction spur. Conclusions: The heel spur is more associated to bursal side tear than the traction spur, whereas the traction spur associates greater to the articular side tear.

Keywords

Rotator cuff tears;Bone spur;Heel spur;Traction spur

References

  1. Bonsell S, Pearsall AW 4th, Heitman RJ, Helms CA, Major NM, Speer KP. The relationship of age, gender, and degenerative changes observed on radiographs of the shoulder in asymptomatic individuals. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(8):1135-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.82B8.0821135
  2. Gill TJ, McIrvin E, Kocher MS, Homa K, Mair SD, Hawkins RJ. The relative importance of acromial morphology and age with respect to rotator cuff pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(4):327-30. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.124425. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.124425
  3. Hamid N, Omid R, Yamaguchi K, Steger-May K, Stobbs G, Keener JD. Relationship of radiographic acromial characteristics and rotator cuff disease: a prospective investigation of clinical, radiographic, and sonographic findings. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(10):1289-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.09.028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.09.028
  4. Panni AS, Milano G, Lucania L, Fabbriciani C, Logroscino CA. Histological analysis of the coracoacromial arch: correlation between age-related changes and rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 1996;12(5):531-40. doi: 10.1016/S0749-8063(96)90190-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(96)90190-5
  5. Neer CS 2nd. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54(1):41-50. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197254010-00003
  6. Neer CS 2nd. Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;(173):70-7.
  7. Codman EA. The shoulder: rupture of the supraspinatus tendon and other lesions in or about the subacromial bursa. Boston (MA): Thomas Todd; 1934. 67-79.
  8. Tempelhof S, Rupp S, Seil R. Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8(4):296-9. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90148-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90148-9
  9. Uhthoff HK, Sarkar K; American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. The effect of aging on the soft tissues of the shoulder. Paper presented at: The Shoulder: A Balance of Mobility and Stability Workshop; 1992 Sep; Vail, USA. p.269-278.
  10. Ogawa K, Yoshida A, Inokuchi W, Naniwa T. Acromial spur: relationship to aging and morphologic changes in the rotator cuff. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(6):591-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.03.007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.03.007
  11. Oh JH, Kim JY, Lee HK, Choi JA. Classification and clinical significance of acromial spur in rotator cuff tear: heeltype spur and rotator cuff tear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(6):1542-50. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1058-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1058-5
  12. Tucker TJ, Snyder SJ. The keeled acromion: an aggressive acromial variant--a series of 20 patients with associated rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(7):744-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.06.018. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(04)00603-6
  13. Bigliani LU, Morrison DS, April EW. The morphology of the acromion and rotator cuff impingement. Orthop Trans. 1986;10:228-35.
  14. Kim YK, Jung KH, Kim JW, Kim US, Hwang DH. Factors affecting rotator cuff integrity after arthroscopic repair for medium-sized or larger cuff tears: a retrospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(6):1012-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.016
  15. Kim YK, Jung KH, Park CK, Yun SB. Morphologic factors related to repair outcomes for delaminated rotator cuff tears: a minimum 2-year retrospective comparison study. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(2):332-40. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.040
  16. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  17. Kim JH, Min YK, Gwak HC, Kim CW, Lee CR, Lee SJ. Rotator cuff tear incidence association with critical shoulder angle and subacromial osteophytes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(3):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.026
  18. Sasiponganan C, Dessouky R, Ashikyan O, et al. Subacromial impingement anatomy and its association with rotator cuff pathology in women: radiograph and MRI correlation, a retrospective evaluation. Skeletal Radiol. 2019;48(5):781-90. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-3096-0. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-3096-0
  19. Chambler AF, Pitsillides AA, Emery RJ. Acromial spur formation in patients with rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(4):314-21. doi: 10.1016/mse.2003.S1058274603000302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(03)00030-2
  20. Hashimoto T, Nobuhara K, Hamada T. Pathologic evidence of degeneration as a primary cause of rotator cuff tear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(415):111-20. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000092974.12414.22.
  21. Chansky HA, Iannotti JP. The vascularity of the rotator cuff. Clin Sports Med. 1991;10(4):807-22.
  22. Nixon JE, DiStefano V. Ruptures of the rotator cuff. Orthop Clin North Am. 1975;6(2):423-47.
  23. Ozaki J, Fujimoto S, Nakagawa Y, Masuhara K, Tamai S. Tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder associated with pathological changes in the acromion. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(8):1224-30. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198870080-00015
  24. Fu FH, Harner CD, Klein AH. Shoulder impingement syndrome. A critical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;(269):162-73.
  25. Oh JH, Oh CH, Kim SH, Kim JH, Yoon JP, Jung JH. Clinical features of partial anterior bursal-sided supraspinatus tendon (PABST) lesions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(3):295-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.025
  26. Beard DJ, Rees JL, Cook JA, et al.; CSAW Study Group. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for subacromial shoulder pain (CSAW): a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, placebo-controlled, three-group, randomised surgical trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10118):329-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32457-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32457-1
  27. Bond EC, Maher A, Hunt L, et al. The role of acromioplasty when repairing rotator cuff tears-no difference in pain or functional outcome at 24 months in a cohort of 2,441 patients. N Z Med J. 2017;130(1458):13-20.
  28. Kolk A, Thomassen BJW, Hund H, et al. Does acromioplasty result in favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes in the management of chronic subacromial pain syndrome? A doubleblinded randomized clinical trial with 9 to 14 years' follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(8):1407-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.021
  29. Peh WC, Farmer TH, Totty WG. Acromial arch shape: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;195(2):501-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724774. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724774