DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the educational methodology for improving pre-service teachers' competence of designing STEAM classes

예비교사의 융합수업 구성능력향상을 위한 교육방법 연구

  • Received : 2019.06.01
  • Accepted : 2019.08.20
  • Published : 2019.08.28

Abstract

It is very important to have pre-service teachers enhance actual content development skill for STEAM classes through deep understanding of the concept. Thus the purpose of the study is to explore the educational methodology for improving pre-service teachers' competence of designing STEAM classes. The research performed with 17 pre-service teachers from Y university and 15 from S university in 2015. It includes blended learning methodology mixing online and offline classes. The result revealed that the students' perception on and the materialization skill of the STEAM education was improved by the methods of Lesson Study and blended learning. A positive result also came out in the respect of the perception on teaching with technology.

Keywords

STEAM education;blended learning;pre-service teachers;STEAM;Lesson Study

References

  1. Y. Y. Hong. (2014). Pre-service teachers' practical use of graphing calculators for STEAM education. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 20(3), 355-372.
  2. C. Lewis. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
  3. J. S. Kim. (2007). Exploration of STEM Education as a New Integrated Education for Technology Education. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 7(3), 1-29.
  4. Y. S. Baek, H. J. Park, Y. Kim, S. K. Noh, J. Park, J. Leee, J. Jeong, Y. Choi & H. Han. (2012). A study on the action, plans for STEAM Education. Research Paper of Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
  5. J. Stigler & Sr J. Hiebert. (1999). The Teaching Gap. New York: Free Press.
  6. M. Yoshida. (1999). Lesson study in elementary school mathematics in Japan: A case study. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada. Available from .
  7. A. Murata & S. Kattubadi. (2012). Grade 3 students' mathematization through modeling: Situation models and solution models with multi-digit problem solving. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31. 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.07.004
  8. C. Lewis & I. Tsuchida. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: Research lessons and the improvement of Japanese education. American Educator, 14, 50-52.
  9. S. D. Kim & K. T. Suh. (2017), A Study on Implications for Instruction Consulting of Korea through Innovative Teaching Methods of Lesson Study. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 7(9),. 891-899.
  10. C. Lewis, R. Perry & A. Murata. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement?: The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3-14.
  11. L. Sims & D. Walsh. (2008). Lesson study with preservice teachers: Lessons for lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 724-733.
  12. P. J. Smith. (2001). 'Modern' learning methods: rhetoric and reality. Personnel Review, 31(1), 103-113.
  13. C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham. (2012). The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
  14. H. L. Kwon, E. K. Moon & I. W. Park. (2015). A meta-analysis on effects of blended learning in Korea. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 21(3), 333-359.
  15. S. I. Park, S. E. Lee & J. E. Song. (2007). Major Factors Influencing Effective On/offline Learning on the Blended Learning in Higher Education. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 15(1), 17-45.
  16. S. Y. Jeong. (2018). Effects of Blended Learning based Phonological Awareness Instruction on Primary English Reading Abilities. Master's dissertation. Seoul National University of Education.
  17. W. S. Kim. (2015). Analysis of Student Satisfaction Survey on Computer Practice Subject by Applying Blended Learning. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(3), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.3.373
  18. R. Fogarty. (1991). Ten ways to integrate curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 61-65.
  19. S. K. Chung, K. H. Lee, Y. J. Yoo, B. M. Shin, M. Park & S. Y. Han. (2012). A Survey of Teachers' Perspectives on Process-Focused Assessment in School Mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 22(3), 401-427.
  20. Y. Y. Hong & Y. W. Im. (2012). An analysis of factors which affect teachers' self-confidence in using technology for mathematics class. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(11), 565-577.