Comparing the efficiency and convenience of one-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation chest compression techniques for infants

1인 구조자 영아 심폐소생술 가슴압박 방법에 따른 효율성 및 편리성 비교

  • Kim, Yong-Joon (Department of Emergency Medical Service, Kongju National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyoung-Youl (Department of Emergency Medical Service, Kongju National University)
  • Received : 2019.07.12
  • Accepted : 2019.08.18
  • Published : 2019.08.31


Purpose: This study aimed to propose an effective one-rescuer infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) chest compression technique by comparing the differences in efficacy, convenience, and pain levels between the two thumb-encircling and two finger techniques. Methods: Subjects were randomized to perform either two-thumb-encircling or two-finger technique for 8 minutes each on infant CPR manikins. After the chest compression, a survey was administered to the subjects to measure convenience and pain levels according to compression method. Results: Total compression depth over 8 minutes was significantly deeper for the two-thum-encircling technique ($43.5{\pm}4.8mm$) compared with the two-finger technique ($32.6{\pm}5.4mm$) (p<0.001). In terms of compression depth measured at 1-minute intervals, compression depth with the two-finger technique decreased from $38.3{\pm}4.23mm$ to $29.0{\pm}6.79mm$, whereas compression depth with the two-thumb-encircling technique did not show a significant change (from $43.7{\pm}4.12mm$ to $43.4{\pm}5mm$). The results of the survey indicated that, the majority of subjects found the two-thumb-encircling technique to be the most comfortable technique for compression depth (n=29, 64.4%). The majority of subjects (n=31, 68.9%) answered that the two-finger technique resulted in the most pain. Conclusion: Comparison of efficacy of the two-thumb-encircling and two-finger-techniques in the performance of one-rescuer infant CPR revealed that the two-thumb-encircling technique was more effective in maintaining chest compression depth.


  1. KOSIS. Annual report on the cause of death statistics. 2016.
  2. Chang I, Ro YS, Shin SD, Song KJ, Park JH, Kong SY. Association of dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation with survival outcomes after pediatric out-ofhospital cardiac arrest by community property value. Resuscitation 132; 120-6. 2018.
  3. Nehme Z, Namachivayam S, Forrest A, Butt W, Bernard S, Smith K. Trends in the incidence and outcome of paediatric out of hospital cardiac arrest: A 17-year observational study. Resuscitation 2018:128;43-50.
  4. Korea Association of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. 2015 Korean guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. 2015
  5. Atkins DL, Berger S, Duff JP, Gonzales JC, Hunt EA, Joyner BL et al. Part 11: pediatric basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2015:132(18);S519-S25.
  6. Smereka J, Szarpak L, Abelairas-Gomez C. Randomized comparison of two-thumb vs. two-finger chest compression during infant resuscitation performed by paramedics. Resuscitation 2017:106(1);e34.
  7. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support. Pediatrics 2006:117(5);e955-77.
  8. Shin J, Hwang SY, Lee HJ, Park CJ, Kim YJ, Son YJ et al. Comparison of CPR quality and rescuer fatigue between standard 30:2 CPR and chest compression-only CPR: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2014:28;22-59.
  9. Jiang J, Zou Y, Shi W, Zhu, Y, Tao R, Jiang Y et al. Two-thumb-encircling hands technique is more advisable than 2-finger technique when lone rescuer performs cardiopulmonary resuscitation on infant manikin. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2015:33(4); 531-4.
  10. Smereka J, Szarpak L, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Ladny JR, Leung S, Ruetzler K. A randomized comparison of three chest compression techniques and associated hemodynamic effect during infant CPR: A randomized manikin study. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2017:35(10);1420-5.
  11. Dorfsman ML, Menegazzi JJ, Wadas RJ, Auble TE. Two‐thumb vs two finger chest compression in an infant model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Academic Emergency Medicine 2008:7(10);1077-2.
  12. Jo CH, Jung HS, Cho GC, Oh YJ. Over-the-head two-thumb encircling technique as an alternative to the two-finger technique in the in-hospital infant cardiac arrest setting: a randomised crossover simulation study. Emergency Medicine Journal 2015:32(9);703-7.
  13. Pellegrino JL, Bogumil D, Epstein JL, Burke RV. Two-thumb-encircling advantageous for lay responder infant CPR: a randomised manikin study. Archives of Disease in Cildhood 2019:chdischild-2018-314893.