Comparison of butterfly monitoring methods in agricultural landscapes in Korea

우리나라 농촌경관에 서식하는 나비 모니터링 조사 방법 비교 연구

  • Choi, Sei-Woong (Environmental Ecology Lab., Department of Environmental Education, Mokpo National University)
  • 최세웅 (목포대학교 환경교육과 환경생태학실험실)
  • Received : 2019.03.05
  • Accepted : 2019.03.18
  • Published : 2019.03.31


Global warming has a significant impact on diverse ecosystems including agroecosystem through; changing of phenology, physiology and distribution. Monitoring of biological responses emanating from global warming is required to understand the challenges of biological diversity conservation posed by climate change. The Korean government selected four butterfly species as indicators of climate change in agroecosystem: Papilio xuthus, Pieris rapae, Colias erate, and Eurema mandarina. The aim of this study was to investigate the different monitoring methods of the butterflies in Korea and suggest a suitable monitoring method to track the population trends of butterflies in the agroecosystem. Butterfly monitoring was conducted in eight sites throughout Korea from April to October, 2018 using three survey methods: point census at rice paddy area, point census at the border between rice paddy and hill and line transect along the rice paddy and hill. Each method took approximately 30 min. to count the butterflies. A total of 4,691 butterflies and 92 species were counted: The most dominant species was Pieris rapae with a total count of 1,205 individuals followed by Polygonia c-aureum, Zizeeria maha, Colias erate, Cupido argiades and Papilio xuthus. Among the three census methods, the total number of species and individuals when using line transect method was statistically higher than in the other methods. However, the numbers of the four butterflies indicators showed no difference throughout three census methods. Based on the number of species and the total individuals butterflies in agroecosystem, we advocate for the application of line transect method as it can find more butterflies in agroecosystem. In addition, we advised for the implementation of education programs on the line transect method in butterfly identification to participants of the national monitoring program.


Supported by : 농업과학원


  1. Anderson DR, JL Laake, BR Crain and KP Burnham. 1979. Guidelines for line transect sampling of biological populations. J. Wildlife Manage. 43:70-78.
  2. Andrew NR, SJ Hill, M Binns, MH Bahar, EV Ridley, MP Jung, C Fyfe, M Yates and M Khusro. 2013. Assessing insect response to climate change: What are we testing for? Where should we be heading? PeerJ 1:e11.
  3. Asher J, M Warren, R Fox, P Harding, G Jeffcoate and S Jeffcoate. 2001. The millennium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford. p. 456.
  4. Choi SW and JS An. 2015. Pattern of change of the local butterfly community in a rural area of southwestern part of Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 33:53-62.
  5. Dennis EB, BJT Morgan, TM Brereton, DB Roy and R Fox. 2017. Using citizen science butterfly counts to predict species population trends. Conserv. Biol. 31:1350-1361.
  6. Garbach K, JC Milder, M Montenegro, DS Karp and FAJ DeClerck. 2014. Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in agroecosystems. pp. 21-40. In Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems (2nd ed.). Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  7. Hammer O, DAT Harper and PD Ryan. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeo. Electron. 4:1-9.
  8. Kim DS, H Yi, YJ Kwon and MS Woo. 2007. The butterfly community dynamics at Mt. Midong, Cheongwon-gun, Chungcheongbukdo, Korean J. Environ. Biol. 25:319-325.
  9. Kim DS, DS Park, HS Oh, DH Kim and JC Jeong. 2013. Butterfly community monitoring on Wolchulsan National Park in Korea. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 27:196-203.
  10. Kim MH, SW Choi, C Jung, KJ Ahn, YJ Oh, YJ Song, SI Kwon, J Eo and HK Nam. 2018. Indicator species of climate change in agroecosystem of Korea. National Institute of Agricultural Sciences. Wanju. p. 135.
  11. Kitahara M and M Watanabe. 2003. Diversity and rarity hotspots and conservation of butterfly communities in and around the Aokigahara woodland of Mount Fuji, Central Japan. Ecol. Res. 18:503-522.
  12. Marsden SJ. 2008. Estimation of parrot and hornbill densities using a point count distance sampling method. IBIS 141:327-390.
  13. Moonen AC and P Barberi. 2008. Functional biodiversity: An agroecosystem approach. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 127:7-21.
  14. Odum EP. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262-270.
  15. Pollard E and TJ Yates. 1993. Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman & Hall, London.
  16. Pollard E, D Moss and TJ Yates. 1995. Population trends of common British butterflies at monitored sites. J. Appl. Ecol. 32:9-16.
  17. Soderstom B, B Svensson, K Vessby and A Glimster. 2001. Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodivers. Conserv. 10:1839-1863.
  18. Thomas JA. 2005. Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360:339-357.
  19. Traill LW, MLM Lim, NS Sodhi and CJA Bradshaw. 2010. Mechanisms driving change: altered species interactions and ecosystem function through global warming. J. Anim. Ecol. 79:937-947.
  20. Tscharntke T, AM Klein, A Kruess, I Steffan-Dewenter and C Thies. 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 8:857-874.
  21. Van Swaay CAM, P Nowicki, J Settele and AJ van Strien. 2008. Butterfly monitoring in Europe: methods, applications and perspectives. Biodivers. Conserv. 17:3445-3469.
  22. Vitousek PM. 1994. Beyond global warming: Ecology and global change. Ecology 75:1861-1876.
  23. Westphal C, I Steffan-Dewenter and T Tscharntke. 2003. Mass flowering crops enhance densities at a landscape scale. Ecol. Lett. 6:961-965.
  24. Zhang W, TH Ricketts, C Kremen, K Carney and SM Swinton. 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol. Econ. 64:253-260.