DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk Communication on Social Media during the Sewol Ferry Disaster

Song, Minsun;Jung, Kyujin;Kim, Jiyoung Ydun;Park, Han Woo

  • Published : 2019.07.22

Abstract

The frequent occurrence of overwhelming disasters necessitates risk communication systems capable of operating effectively in disaster contexts. Few studies have examined risk communication networks during disasters through social networking services (SNS). This study therefore investigates the patterns of risk communication by comparing Korean and international networks based on the social amplification of risk communication in the context of the Sewol ferry disaster (SFD). In addition, differences in language use and patterns between Korean and international contexts are identified through a semantic analysis using KrKwick, NodeXL, and UCINET. The SFD refers to the sinking of the ferry while carrying 476 people, mostly secondary school students. The results for interpersonal risk communication reveal that the structure of the Korean risk communication network differed from that of the international network. The Korean network was more fragmented, and its clustering was more sparsely knitted based on the impact and physical proximity of the disaster. Semantic networks imply that the physical distance from the disaster affected the content of risk communication, as well as the network pattern.

Keywords

Risk Communication;Twitter;Facebook;Sewol Ferry Disaster;Webometrics

References

  1. Aldoory, L. & Sha, B.L., (2007). The situational theory of publics: Practical applications, methodological challenges, and theoretical horizons In E. L. Toth (Ed.), The future of excellence in public relations and communication management: Challenges for the next generation, pp.339-355. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  2. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage, London.
  3. Binder, A. R., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Gunther, A. C. (2011). Interpersonal amplification of risk? Citizen discussions and their impact on perceptions of risks and benefits of a biological research facility, Risk analysis, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 324-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01516.x
  4. Borgatti, S., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L., (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  5. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences, Science, Vol. 323 No. 5916, pp. 892-895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital, In: Richardson JG (ed.) Handbook of Theory And Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, pp. 241-258.
  7. Boyd, D. (2006). Friends, Friendsters, and MySpace Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites, First Monday, Vol. 11, No. 12.
  8. Cho, S. E., Choi, M., & Park, H. W. (2012). Government-civic group conflicts and communication strategy: A text analysis of TV debates on Korea's import of US beef. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 11(1), 1-20.
  9. Chung, I. J. (2011). Social amplification of risk in the Internet environment, Risk Analysis, Vol. 31, No. 12, pp. 1883-1896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01623.x
  10. Cole, T. W., & Fellows, K. L. (2008). Risk communication failure: A case study of New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina, Southern Communication Journal, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 211-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940802219702
  11. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ''friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 1143-1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
  12. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices, New Media & Society, 1461444810385389.
  13. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification, Social networks, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 215-239.
  14. Fruchterman, T.M.J., & Reingold, E.M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement software: practice and experience. 21(11). 1129-1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380211102
  15. Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 55, No. 10, pp.1294-1318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211409378
  16. Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S. T. E. L. L. A., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures, Human communication research, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 510-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00377.x
  17. Hagar, C. (2009). The Information and Social Needs of Cumbrian Farmers During the UK 2001 Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreak and the Role of Information and Communication Technologies, In Doring, M. & Nerlich, B. (Eds.), The Socio-Cultural Impact of Foot and Mouth Disease in the UK in 2001: Experiences and Analyses, Manchester University Press.
  18. Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (2010). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Morgan Kaufmann.
  19. Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., & Wu, F. (2008). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope, arXiv preprint arXiv:0812.1045.
  20. Hughes, A. L., & Palen, L. (2009). Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events, International Journal of Emergency Management, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 248-260. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEM.2009.031564
  21. Hughes, A. L., Palen, L., Sutton, J., Liu, S. B., & Vieweg, S. (2008). Sight-Seeing in Disaster: An Examination of On-Line Social Convergence, paper presented at the Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management Conference (ISCRAM).
  22. International Federation of Red Cross Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) (2013). World Disasters Report: Focus on technology and the future of humanitarian action. American Red Cross, available at http://www.scribd.com/doc/176902958/World-Disasters-Report-Focus-on-technology-and-the-future-of-humanitarian-action
  23. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities, paper presented at the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis. ACM. pp. 56-65.
  24. Jung, K.Y., Song, M.S., & Park, H.W. (2018). Filling the Gap between Bureaucratic and Adaptive Approaches to Crisis Management: Lessons from the Sewol Ferry Sinking in South Korea. Quality & Quantity. 52(1), 277-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0467-x
  25. Jung, K. & Park, H. W. (2014). Citizens' Social Media Use and Homeland Security Information Policy: Some Evidences from Twitter Users during the 2013 North Korea Nuclear Test, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 31, pp. 563-573, available at DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-0092-x https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.06.003
  26. Jung, K., No, W., & Kim, J. W. (2014). Who Leads Nonprofit Advocacy through Social Media? Some evidences from the Australian Marine Conservation Society's Twitter Networks. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 13 (1): 69-81
  27. Jung, K. & Park, H. W. (2015). A Semantic (TRIZ) Network Analysis of South Korea's Open Public Data Policy, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 32, pp. 353-358, available at DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.006
  28. Jung, K. & Park, H. W. (2016). Tracing Interorganizational Information Networks during Emergency Responses: A Webometric Approach to the 2012 Gumi Chemical Spill. Government Information Quarterly, available at DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.01
  29. Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., & Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework, Risk analysis, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
  30. Kim, J.N. & Grunig, J.E., (2011). Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication, 61(1), pp.120-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01529.x
  31. Kim, S. K., Park, M. J., & Rho, J. J. (2013). Effect of the Government's Use of Social Media on the Reliability of the Government: Focus on Twitter, Public Management Review. Available at DOI:10.1080/14719037.2013.822530.
  32. Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P., & Arlitt, M. (2008, August). A few chirps about twitter. paper presented at the first workshop on Online social networks, ACM. pp. 19-24.
  33. Lin, K., & Lu, H. (2011). Intention to continue using Facebook fan pages from the perspective of social capital theory, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, Vol. 14, No. 10, pp. 565-570. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0472
  34. McCorkindale, T. (2010). Can you see the writing on my wall? A content analysis of the Fortune 50's Facebook social networking sites, Public Relations Journal, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 1-14.
  35. Meier, H. (2016). Global Civil Society from Hyperlink Perspective: Exploring the Website Networks of International NGOs. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 15(1). 64-77 https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2016.15.1.064
  36. Meza, X.V., & Park, H.W. (2016). Organic Products in Mexico and South Korea on Twitter. Journal of Business Ethics. 135. 587-603. DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2345-y
  37. Naaman, M., Boase, J., & Lai, C.H. (2010). Is it Really About Me? Message Content in Social Awareness Streams, paper presented at the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 189-192.
  38. Park, J., Baek, Y. M., & Cha, M. (2014). Cross-Cultural Comparison of Nonverbal Cues in Emoticons on Twitter: Evidence from Big Data Analysis, Journal of Communication, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 333-354. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12086
  39. Park, M., Cha, C., Cha, M. & Kweon, Y. (2013). Expression of depressive moods on Twitter, Telecommunications Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 304-316.
  40. Park, S. J. & Lim, Y. S. (2014). Information Networks and Social Media Use in Public Diplomacy: a comparative analysis of South Korea and Japan, Asian Journal of Communication. Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2013.851724
  41. Procter & Gamble Facebook page. Retrieved on March 9, 2009, available at http://www.facebook.com/home.php?
  42. Park, S. J., Lim, Y. S., Sams, S., Nam, S. M., & Park, H. W. (2011). Networked politics on Cyworld: The text and sentiment of Korean political profiles, Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 288-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310382509
  43. Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R. E., & Slovic, P. (Eds.). (2003). The social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press
  44. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  45. Renn, O. (2011). The social amplification/attenuation of risk framework: application to climate change, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 154-169. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.99
  46. Rosa, E. A. (2003). The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework (SARF). Metatheoretical Foundations and Policy Implications. In: N. Pidgeon; R.E. Kasperson and P. Slovic (eds.): The social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 47-49.
  47. Rogers, M.B., Amlot, R., Rubin, G.J., Wessely, S. & Krieger, K.. (2007). Mediating the social and psychological impacts of terrorist attacks: The role of risk perception and risk communication. International Review of Psychiatry, 19(3), pp.279-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260701349373
  48. Scott, J., & Carrington, P. J. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. SAGE publications.
  49. Shapiro, M. A. (2014, September/October). Establishing 'Green Regionalism': Environmental Technology Generation across East Asia and Beyond, Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 41-56.
  50. Sheppard, B., Janoske, M., & Liu, B. (2012). Understanding risk communication theory: A guide for emergency managers and communicators, Report to Human Factors/Behavioral Science.
  51. Shklovski, I., Burke, M., Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (2010). Technology adoption and use in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 53, No. 8, pp. 1228-1246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209356252
  52. Smith, M. (2015). Catalyzing social media scholarship with open tools and data. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 14 (2), 87-96 https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2015.14.2.087
  53. Smith, M. A., Shneiderman, B., Milic-Frayling, N., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Barash, V., Dunne, C., Capone, T, Perer, A., & Gleave, E. (2009, June). Analyzing (social media) networks with NodeXL, paper presented at the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies, ACM. pp. 255-264.
  54. Steinfield, C., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 29, pp. 434-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002
  55. Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S., Waechter, N. & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social net- works: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 29, pp. 420-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.003
  56. Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A., & Wellman, B. (2012). Geography of Twitter networks. Social networks, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.006
  57. The Social Engagement Team at National Headquarters (2012). Social Engagement Handbook Version 2.0. American Red Cross, available at http://www.scribd.com/doc/92697012/Social-Engagement-Handbook-2-0
  58. van de Velde, B., Meijer, A., & Homburg, V. (2014). Police message diffusion on Twitter: analysing the reach of social media communications, Behaviour & Information Technology, available at DOI:10.1080/0144929X.2014.942754
  59. Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation, Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, Vol. 14, pp. 875-901..,mn. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x
  60. Xu, W. W., Sang, Y., Blasiola, S., & Park, H. W. (2014). Predicting Opinion Leaders in Twitter Activism Networks: The Case of the Wisconsin Recall Election. American Behavioral Scientist. 58(10), 1278-1293. DOI: 10.1177/0002764214527091 https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214527091
  61. Yates, D., & Paquette, S. (2011). Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.001