Value Recognition and Intention to Adopt Smart City Services: A Public Value Management Theory Approach

  • Lee, Seung Ha (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Jung Hoon (Graduate School of Information of Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Young Joo (National Information Society Agency (NIA))
  • Published : 2019.07.22


Smart city, which employs information and communication technology (ICT) to resolve urban problems, is gaining more research attention in the innovation research. However, most previous studies regard citizens as merely passive accepters of the smart city services, focusing on individual private values. The present study aims to expand existing limited perspectives by applying public value management theory. Drawing from the literature review, we developed a dual perspective that a smart city service should encompass: private and public value. Then we set up a causal relationship between the value recognitions and intention to adopt smart city services. We further related antecedent variables to the dual value recognition in terms of citizens' characteristics: prior knowledge, personal innovativeness, and citizenship. Two case subjects among currently operating smart city services in South Korea were selected to empirically investigate our hypothesis. Results confirm the recognition of both public and private value is significantly related to the citizens' personal characteristics and resultant attitude towards acceptance and support for diffusion of the smart city services. This study is expected to provide useful implications for a new angle for the recipient of the smart city services, value orientation of the services, citizen's participation, and method selection for promotion.


Supported by : Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (Keit)


  1. Airaksinen, M., Pinto S., Isabel, Huovila, Aapo, Neumann, H. M., Iglar, B. & Bosch, P. (2017). Smart city performance measurement framework. CITYkeys, 718-723.
  2. Allen, L. R., Long, P. T., Perdue, R. R., & Kieselbach, S. (1988). The impact of tourism development on residents perceptions of community life. Journal of Travel Research, 27(1), 16-21.
  3. An, S. J., & Oh, D.H. (2010). A study on the classification criteria of u-city based on the characteristics of u-city services. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association, 23(3), 253-270.
  4. Auh, S., Bell, S. J., Mcleod, C. S., & Shih, E. (2007). Co-production and customer loyalty in financial services. Journal of Retailing, 83(3), 359-370.
  5. Basiago, A. D. (1998). Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. Environmentalist, 19(2), 145-161.
  6. Benington, J., & Moore, M. H. (2011). Public value: theory and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  7. Bettencourt, L. A., Gwinner, K. P., & Meuter, M. L. (2001). A comparison of attitude, personality, and knowledge predictors of service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 29-41.
  8. Brucks, M. (1986). A typology of consumer knowledge content. NA - Advances in Consumer Research, 13. 58-63.
  9. Byun, W. S., Park, S.T. and Kim, T.U. (2013). Impact of service value, innovativeness of egovernment service and users' participation on government trust. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(4), 45-55.
  10. Castelnovo, W. (2012). Public services co-production: from users' engagement to the state 2.0. Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Italy.
  11. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., . . . Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  12. Cosgrave, E., Tryfonas, T., & Crick, T. (2014). The smart city from a public value perspective. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference ICT for Sustainability.
  13. Coutelle-Brillet, P., Riviere, A., & des Garets, V. (2014). Perceived value of service innovation: a conceptual framework. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 29(2), 164-172. 10.1108/jbim-04-2012-0066
  14. Cronin, J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193-218.
  15. Cunningham, J. V. (1972). Citizen participation in public affairs. Public Administration Review, 32, 589.
  16. Dameri, R. P. (2012). Searching for smart city definition: A comprehensive proposal. International Journal Of Computers & Technology, 11(5), 2544-2551.
  17. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319.
  18. Eskelinen, J., Robles, A. G., Lindy, I., Marsh, J., & Muente-Kunigami, A. (Eds.). (2015). Citizen-driven innovation. World Bank Publications.
  19. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. 10.1177/002224378101800104
  20. Goldsmith, R. E., & Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 209-221.
  21. Goldsmith, R. E., Kim, D., Flynn, L. R., & Kim, W. M. (2005). Price sensitivity and innovativeness for fashion among Korean consumers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(5), 501-508.
  22. Goldsmith, R.E. and Newell, S.J. (1997). Innovativeness and price sensitivity: managerial, theoretical and methodological issues." Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6(3), 163-174.
  23. Granier, B., & Kudo, H. (2016). How are citizens involved in smart cities? analysing citizen participation in Japanese 'Smart Communities'. Information Polity, 21(1), 61-76.
  24. Ha, Y.W. & Park, J.C. (2000). Direction-of-comparison effect in preference judgment: moderating role of product knowledge and information mode. Sogang Journal of Business, 11(2), 403-426.
  25. Han, D.H., Kim, K.S. and Leem, C.S. (2014). A study on the affecting factors of u-city service acceptance. Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 19(2). 53-74.
  26. Han, S.L., Lee, M.S., Ahan, M.A. & Lee, S.W. (2013). Analysis for mutual growth factors of large and small business companies - focusing on social exchange theory. Korea Business Review, 17(4), 1-21.
  27. Handrich, M. & Heidenreic, S. H (2013). The willingness of a customer to co-create innovative, technology-based services: conceptualization and measurement." International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 1-36.
  28. Hartley, J., Alford, J., Knies, E., & Douglas, S. (2017). Towards an empirical research agenda for public value theory. Public Management Review, 19(5), 670-685.
  29. Hartman, J. B., Shim, S., Barber, B., & Obrien, M. (2006). Adolescents utilitarian and hedonic web consumption behavior: hierarchical influence of personal values and innovativeness. Psychology and Marketing, 23(10), 813-839.
  30. Heberer, T. (2008). China: creating civil-society structures top-down?. In Changing Images of Civil Society, Routledge, 101-118.
  31. Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. (2004). Privatization and its reverse: explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 171-190.
  32. Hirschman, E. C. (1984). Experience seeking: a subjectivist perspective of consumption. Journal of Business research, 12(1), 115-136.
  33. Hollands, R. G. (2014). Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 61-77.
  34. Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms(Revised ed.). Oxford, England: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  35. Horner, L., & Hazel, L. (2005). Adding public value. London: The Work Foundation,
  36. Horner, Louise & Hutton, Will. (2011). Public value, deliberative democracy and the role of public managers. Public Value, 112-126,
  37. Rebecca Yen, H., Gwinner, K. P., & Su, W. (2004). The impact of customer participation and service expectation on locus attributions following service failure. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15(1), 7-26.
  38. Hwang, K. H., Song, S.H., & Jeong, C. (2016). Influence analysis of community resident support for marine tourism development. Journal of Tourism Studies, 28(1), 105-132.
  39. IBM (2012). IBM Smarter Cities: creating opportunities through leadership and innovation. IBM Industry Solutions., IBM Corporation Software Group.
  40. ITU(International Telecommunications Union) (2014), Overview of key performance indicators in smart sustainable cities. Telecommunication standardization sector of ITU, ITU-T FG-SSC.
  41. M. Adil Khan, (1995), Sustainable development: The key concepts, issues and implications. Keynote paper given at the international sustainable development research conference, 27-29 march 1995, Manchester, UK, Sustainable Development, 3(2), 63-69.
  42. Khansari, N., Mostashari, A., & Mansouri, M. (2014). Impacting sustainable behavior and planning in smart city. International Journal of Sustainable Land Use and Urban Planning, 1(2), 46-61.
  43. Kim, D. W., Yoo, J. Y., & Joung, W. K. (2014). A study on the willingness to pay of decision factor for mobile IPTV. Journal of Broadcast Engineering, 19(3), 385-395.
  44. Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Decision support systems, 43(1), 111-126.
  45. Kim, J. Y., & Lee, C. K. (2013). The effects of characteristics of smartphone tourism information on user's perceived value and intention to use. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Studies, 15(1), 1-20
  46. Kim, S.H. (2006). A study on applications of policy marketing to customer segmentation. Chungang Public Administration Review, 20(2), 57-91.
  47. Kuo, Y. F., Wu, C.M. & Deng, W.J. (2009). The relationships among service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and post-purchase intention in mobile value-added services. Computers in human behavior, 25(4), 887-896.
  48. Kwak, H. K. (2010). A study on the contradiction of democratic deficit and transmission from the viewpoint of public value management. The Korean Journal of Public Administration, 3-36.
  49. Kwak, H. K. (2011). An exploratory study on the perception of public service from citizen perspective in the context of public value management. Korean society and public administration.
  50. Liao, C. H. (2015). Does organizational citizenship behavior add value to human interaction with e-services? Online Information Review, 39(4), 485-504.
  51. Lee, C. H., Lee, D. Y, Kim, C. H. & Jeong, S. C. (2014). A Study on the citizens' acceptance factors for u-city project. The Journal of internet electronic commerce research, 14(4), 441-460.
  52. Lee, E. M., & Yoon, S. J. (2016). The effect of consumer citizenship on attitude toward CSR activities and consumer loyalty. Journal of Commodity Science & Technology, 34(1), 93-102.
  53. Lee, J., & Lee, H. (2014). Developing and validating a citizen-centric typology for smart city services. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 93-105.
  54. Lee, J. H., Hancock, M. G., & Hu, M. C. (2014). Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 80-99.
  55. Lee, J. H. (2017). Smart cities index report 2017: Analysis of 10 global smart cities, Yonsei University, Republic of Korea.
  56. March, H. (2018). The smart city and other ICT-led techno-imaginaries: any room for dialogue with degrowth?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1694-1703.
  57. D Mello, Carmelita & Chang, Ling-Chen & Kamat, Kaustubh & Scaglione, Miriam & Weiermair, Klaus & KB Pillai, Subhash. (2015). An examination of factors influencing residents perception of the impacts of tourism in Goa. International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Systems. 8.
  58. Millard, J., & Horlings, E. (2008). Current e-government trends, future drivers, and lessons from earlier periods of technological change. Interim Report of the 'eGovernment, 2020.
  59. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard university press.
  60. am, S. T., Kim, D. G., & Jin, C. Y. (2013). A study on the continuous intention to use for smartphone based on the innovation diffusion theory: considered on the loyalty between users of iOS and Android platform. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 17(5), 1219-1226.
  61. Nam, T. W. & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times, ACM. 282-291
  62. Noh, M., Runyan, R., & Mosier, J. (2014). Young consumers' innovativeness and hedonic/utilitarian cool attitudes. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 42(4), 267-280.
  63. O'Flynn, J. (2005). Adding public value: A new era of contractual governance?. In PAC Annual Conference-Public Administration and Management, University of Nottingham, 5-7.
  64. Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. Journal of consumer research, 8(2), 223-230.
  65. Park, Y. S., Kwak, J., & Min, H. (2014). A cross-cultural study of path from consumer innovativeness to perceived product value, and to purchase intention: evidence from smart phone users in Korea and the U.S. Yonsei Business Review, 51(1), 41-70.
  66. Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 36(1), 83-96.
  67. Qing, W., Dacko, S., & Gad, M. (2008). Factors influencing consumers' evaluation and adoption intention of really-new products or services: prior knowledge, innovativeness and timing of product evaluation. Advances in Consumer Research - North American Conference Proceedings, 35, 416-422.
  68. Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
  69. Sanborn, H. (2017). Democratic participation under authoritarianism in Hong Kong and Singapore. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 16(2), 44-58,
  70. Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., Mayer, D. M., Saltz, J. L., & Niles-Jolly, K. (2005). Understanding organization-customer links in service settings. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1017-1032.
  71. Shin, D. J., & Kang, Y. J. (2016). Study on the Structural Relationship among Residents Local Attachment, Recognition, Benefit, and Support. Korean Journal of Tourism Research, 31(1), 113-129.
  72. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E. , Chatelin, Y.M. and Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational statistics & data analysis, 48(1), 159-205.
  73. Tranos, E. & Gertner, D. (2012). Smart networked cities? Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 175-190.
  74. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.
  75. Venkatraman & Meera. (1991). The impact of innovativeness and innovation type on adoption. Journal of Retailing. 67. 51-67.
  76. Wiig, A., (2016). The empty rhetoric of the smart city: from digital inclusion to economic promotion in Philadelphia. Urban Geography., 37, 535-553.
  77. Won, M. S., & Park, H. S. (2010). Effects of volunteering experience on citizenship. The Korean Association for Governance, 17(3), 225-245.
  78. Yang, J. J., & Choi, S. J. (2017). The influence of campers knowledge on their perceived value, attitude, and revisit intentions. Korean Journal of Tourism Research, 32(2), 123-145.
  79. Yoon, J. M. (1992). The public production theory approach to urban public service supply. City Administration in the Local Autonomous Era.
  80. Yoon, Y. J. (2010). Concept and characteristics of social service. Journal of the Korean Association for Social Service, 1, 9-32.
  81. Yu. H. (1995). The concept of public management and strategic management. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 33(1), 1019-1035.
  82. Yu. H. (2001). Public management theory. Korean Public Administration Review.
  83. Zhang, N. (2014). Measuring civic awareness and validating it's impact on e-paticipation: an empirical study on a G2C platform adoption in China. Proceedings - Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2014.