DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study by Subject on the New R&D Planning Process

신규 R&D 기획 프로세스에 관한 주체별 비교연구

  • Bae, Junhee (Policy & Planning Division, R&D Policy Department, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM)) ;
  • Park, Jungkyu (Geoscience Platform Division, Northern Geoscience & Mineral Resources Strategy Center, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM))
  • 배준희 (한국지질자원연구원 정책기획본부 연구정책실) ;
  • 박정규 (한국지질자원연구원 지오플랫폼연구본부 북방지질자원전략센터)
  • Received : 2019.02.18
  • Accepted : 2019.06.26
  • Published : 2019.06.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to pro-actively respond to changes in government R&D policy and start to supplement the limitations of previous KIGAM R&D planning process. We looked out through the existing literature for a variety of R&D planning process, and analyzed the R&D planning process characteristics of each institution through the interview. As a result, we can be derived conclusions and implications from three sides, environmental analysis, demand excavation methods, R&D project configuration and selection method. In the case of environmental analysis and the overall need to enhance the skills and mega trend analysis by market trend analysis. And in the demand side, the institute need to establish challenging and specific R&D goals. In addition, in case of configuration and selection of R&D projects we derived several implications, such as convergence, SME support, resource analysis, selection of long-term project.

Keywords

R&D planning process;benchmarking;deriving new R&D topic

JOHGB2_2019_v52n3_243_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. R&D Planning Process Flow Chart of A company.

JOHGB2_2019_v52n3_243_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. R&D Planning Process Flow Chart of C company.

JOHGB2_2019_v52n3_243_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Advance development process of D company.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국지질자원연구원

References

  1. Jun, S.P., Seo, J.H. and Son, J.K. (2013) A study of the SME Technology Roadmapping Program to strengthen the R&D planning capability of Korean SMEs. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, v.80, p.1002-1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.022
  2. Korea institute of finance (KIF) (2013) Promotion of national R&D project commercialization. Research Report, 22-04, p.3-9.
  3. Korea institute of geoscience and mineral resources (KIGAM) (2014) 2015-2017 KIGAM Long-term Strategy.
  4. Korea institute of geoscience and mineral resources (KIGAM) (2015) Report on the results of the study group to establish a new KIGAM R&D planning system.
  5. Korea institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP) (2014) Case Study on the Planning of R&D Programs of United States. Research report 2014-020, p.1-101.
  6. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (2014) Strategy of Government R&D Center for Small & Medium Enterprises. National Science and Technology Council, p.1-26.
  7. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (2015a) Government R&D Innovation condition and Future Plan (Plan). p.1-27.
  8. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (2015b) Government R&D Innovation Plan, p.1-8.
  9. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (2015c) Government R&D Innovation Plan and Detailed Implementation Plan, p.1-20.
  10. National research council of Science & Technology (NST) (2018) National R&D Project PRIDE System Manual, p.1-124.
  11. Park, J.S., Park, S.Y., Lee, J.Y., Coh, B.Y. and Moon, Y.H. (2006) The Paradigm Shift in Public R&D Planning and Analysis on GRI's Research Planning. Korea Technology Innovation Society, p.185-201.
  12. Science and Technology Policy Institute (STEPI) (2014) New Methodologies for Designing Government R&D Program Structures. Article 2014-01, p.1-41.