Digital n-γ Pulse Shape Discrimination in Organic Scintillators with a High-Speed Digitizer

  • Kim, Chanho (Department of Bioengineering, Korea University) ;
  • Yeom, Jung-Yeol (Department of Bioengineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Geehyun (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Sejong University)
  • Received : 2018.10.11
  • Accepted : 2019.04.09
  • Published : 2019.06.30


Background: As neutron fields are always accompanied by gamma rays, it is essential to distinguish neutrons from gamma rays in the detection of neutrons. Neutrons and gamma rays can be separated by pulse shape discrimination (PSD) methods. Recently, we performed characterization of a stilbene scintillator detector and an EJ-301 liquid scintillator detector with a high-speed digitizer DT5730 and investigated optimized PSD variables for both detectors. This study is for providing a basis for developing fast neutron/gamma-ray dual-particle imager. Materials and Methods: We conducted PSD experiments using stilbene scintillator and EJ-301 liquid scintillator and evaluated neutron and gamma ray discriminability of each PSD method with a $^{137}Cs$ gamma source and a $^{252}Cf$ neutron source. We implemented digital signal processing techniques to apply two PSD methods - the charge comparison (CC) method and the constant time discrimination (CTD) method - to distinguish neutrons from gamma rays. We tried to find optimized PSD variables giving the best discriminability in a given experimental condition. Results and Discussion: For the stilbene scintillator detector, the charge comparison method and the constant time discrimination method both delivered the PSD FOM values of 1.7. For the EJ-301 liquid scintillator detector, both PSD methods delivered the PSD FOM values of 1.79. With the same PSD variables, PSD performance was excellent in $300{\pm}100keVee$, $500{\pm}100keVee$, and $700{\pm}100keVee$ energy regions. This result shows that we can achieve an effective discrimination of neutrons from gamma rays using these scintillator detector systems. Conclusion: We applied both PSD methods to a stilbene and a liquid scintillator and optimized the PSD performance represented by FOM values. We observed a good separation performance of both scintillators combined with a high-speed digitizer and digital PSD. These results will provide reference values for the dual-particle imager we are developing, which can image both fast neutrons and gamma rays simultaneously.


Supported by : Korea Foundation Of Nuclear Safety (KOFONS), National Research Foundation of South Korea


  1. Knoll GF, Radiation detection and measurement. 4th Ed. New york. John Wiley & Sons. 2010.
  2. Brooks F. Development of organic scintillators, Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 1979;162(1-3):477-505.
  3. Pozzi S, Clarke S, Flaska M, Peerani P. Pulse-height distributions of neutron and gamma rays from plutonium-oxide samples. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A. 2009;608(2):310-315.
  4. Carman L, Zaitseva N, Martinez HP, Rupert B, Pawelczak I, Glenn A, Mulcahy H, Leif R, Lewis K, Payne S. The effect of material purity on the optical and scintillation properties of solution-grown trans-stilbene crystals. J. Cryst. Growth. 2013;368:56-61.
  5. Plischke P, Schroder V, Scobel W, Wilde L, Bormann M. An electronic circuit for pulse shape discrimination in organic scintillators. Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 1976;136(3):579-583.
  6. Perkins L, Scott MC. The application of pulse shape discrimination in NE 213 to neutron spectrometry. Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 1979;166(3):451-464.
  7. Soderstrom PA, Nyberg J, Wolters R. Digital pulse-shape discrimination of fast neutrons and $\gamma$ rays. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A. 2008;594(1):79-89.
  8. Kaschuck Y, Esposito B. Neutron/${\gamma}-ray$ digital pulse shape discrimination with organic scintillators. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A. 2005;551(2-3):420-428.
  9. Bell ZW. Tests on a digital neutron-gamma pulse shape discriminator with NE213. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 1981;188(1):105-109.
  10. Kim HS, Choi HY, Lee G, Ye SJ, Smith MB, Kim G. A Monte Carlo simulation study for the gamma-ray/neutron dual-particle imager using rotational modulation collimator (RMC). J. Radiol. Prot. 2018;38(1):299.
  11. Kim HS, Smith MB, Koslowsky MR, Kwak SH, Ye SJ, Kim G. Characterization of a CLYC detector and validation of the Monte Carlo simulation by measurement experiments. J. Radiol. Prot. Res. 2017;42(1):48-55.
  12. Kim HS, Ye SJ, Shin Y, Lee G, Kim G. Radiation imaging with a rotational modulation collimator (RMC) coupled to a $Cs_2LiYCl_6$: Ce: (CLYC) detector. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2016;69(11):1644-1650.
  13. Bourne M, Clarke S, Adamowicz N, Pozzi S, Zaitseva N, Carman L. Neutron detection in a high-gamma field using solution-grown stilbene. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A. 2016;806:348-355.
  14. Cieslak M, Gamage KA, Glover R. Pulse shape discrimination characteristics of stilbene crystal, pure and 6Li loaded plastic scintillators for a high resolution coded-aperture neutron imager. J. Instrum. 2017;12:P07023.
  15. Feng PL, Villone J, Hattar K, Mrowka S, Wong BM, Allendorf MD, Doty FP. Spectral- and pulse-shape discrimination in triplet-harvesting plastic scintillators. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2012;59(6):3312-3319.
  16. Lang R, Masson D, Pienaar J, Rottger S. Improved pulse shape discrimination in EJ-301 liquid scintillators. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A. 2017;856:26-31.
  17. Winyard R, Lutkin J, McBeth G. Pulse shape discrimination in inorganic and organic scintillators. I. Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 1971;95(1):141-153.
  18., May 2018.
  19., September 2018.
  20. Zaitseva N, Glenn A, Carman L, Martinez HP, Hatarik R, Klapper H, Payne S. Scintillation properties of solution-grown trans-stilbene single crystals. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A. 2015;789: 8-15.