DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Considerations for BIBFRAME Acceptance of Expression and Representative Expression Attributes in LRM

BIBFRAME에서 LRM 표현형 및 대표표현형 속성 적용시 고려사항

  • 이미화 (공주대학교 문헌정보교육과)
  • Received : 2019.05.13
  • Accepted : 2019.06.07
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

Cataloging principles, cataloging rules, and encoding formats should considered LRM acceptance because LRM replaced FRBR as the conceptual model. This study identifies considerations for BIBFRAME acceptance of expression and representative expression attributes in LRM by using literature reviews and expert interviews. Primarily, work in BIBFRAME without expression as entity could map to work and expression of LRM and sustain expression by linking 2 works (work and expression). Second, BIBFRAME must consider association between representative expression attributes and specific expressions whose values can be transferred to the representative expression attributes. Third, representative expression attributes are different according to work types in LRM, and language, media, intended audience, and scale, that can be used as representative expression attributes in BIBFRAME, should be changed in class. Fourth, relation properties should be articulated for expanding networks between expressions originated from work in BIBFRAME. This study analyzes LRM and BIBFRAME by focusing on expression entity and representative expression attributes. More LRM study is needed on cataloging principles and cataloging rules.

BBROBV_2019_v30n2_33_f0001.png 이미지

<그림 1> 도서관 정보조직 관련 표준의 상호관계

BBROBV_2019_v30n2_33_f0002.png 이미지

<그림 2> 대표표현형 속성과 정보를 제공한 대표표현형 사례

BBROBV_2019_v30n2_33_f0003.png 이미지

<그림 3> LRM 초안과 최종안 비교

BBROBV_2019_v30n2_33_f0004.png 이미지

<그림 5> LRM 저작과 표현형 사례

BBROBV_2019_v30n2_33_f0005.png 이미지

<그림 4> LRM 저작의 표제 기술 사례

BBROBV_2019_v30n2_33_f0006.png 이미지

<그림 6> VIAF 저작 전거레코드

BBROBV_2019_v30n2_33_f0007.png 이미지

<그림 7> BIBFRAME 저작 및 인스턴스 사례

<표 1> LRM 저작 및 표현형 속성

BBROBV_2019_v30n2_33_t0001.png 이미지

<표 2> LRM 표현형대 표현형 관계

BBROBV_2019_v30n2_33_t0002.png 이미지

<표 3> LRM 최종안, 초안, FRBR, RDA 저작 및 표현형 속성 비교

BBROBV_2019_v30n2_33_t0003.png 이미지

<표 4> BIBFRAME 속성 사용조건

BBROBV_2019_v30n2_33_t0004.png 이미지

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Park, Ok Nam and Jung Sun Oh. 2014. "Deployment of BIBFRAME as a New Bibliographic Framework in Linked Data." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(4): 235-263. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.4.235
  2. Park, Ok Nam. 2015. "The Study on Design of Korean Classical Literature Ontologies for Popularization." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 26(3): 267-290. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.3.267
  3. Park, Zi-young. 2016. "Linking Bibliographic Data and Public Library Service Data Using Bibliographic Framework." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(1): 293-316. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.293
  4. Yoon, SoYoung, Ziyoung Park, and Hyewon Lee. 2017. "Organizing Bibliographic Information of Korean Classic Materials Using FRBR Library Reference Model." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 51(2): 49-71. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2017.51.1.049
  5. Lee, Mihwa. 2017. "A Study on the Considerations in Constructing BIBFRAME by Analyzing BIBFRAME 2.0." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(4): 107-127. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.4.201712.107
  6. Lee, Mihwa. 2018. "A Study on the Considerations in Constructing BIBFRAME by Analyzing BIBFRAME 2.0." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(4): 107-127. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.201712.107
  7. Lee, Sung-Sook and Ji Won Lee. 2018. "Study on Conversion between MARC 21 and BIBFRAME 2.0." Institute of Social Sciences Chungnam National University, 29(3): 73-93.
  8. Lee, Sung-Sook. 2017. "Change in the Key Concept of Conceptual Model Centering on IFLA LRM." Institute of Social Sciences Chungnam National University, 28(4): 305-324.
  9. Lee, Hyewon. 2018. "A Study on the Consideration of BIBFRAME 2.0 for Sharing Bibliographic Data." Proceeding of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 2018(summer): 75-90.
  10. Bigelow, Ian, Sharon Farnel, and Danoosh Davoodi. 2017. Will You Be My BF: Forever?: Analysing Techniques for Conversion to BIBFRAME. [online]. [cited 2019.1.15]. .
  11. Casalini, Michele. 2017. BIBFRAME and Linked Data Practices for the Stewardship of Research Knowledge. [online]. [cited 2019.1.15]. .
  12. Frank, Paul. 2017. October 30. Interview by Author [Voice Recording and Author Paper]. Library of Congress, Washington D.C.
  13. Gentili-Tedeschi, Massimo. 2017. IFLA LRM.'s Impact on Cataloguing. [online]. [cited 2019.1.15]. .
  14. Glennan, Kathy. 2017. RDA Developments of Note. [online]. [cited 2019.1.15]. .
  15. Glennan, Kathy. 2018. Representative Expression. [online]. [cited 2019.1.15]. .
  16. IFLA Cataloging Section and IFLA Meetings of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code. 2016. Statement of International Cataloguing Principles. [online]. [cited 2019.1.15]. .
  17. Iseminger, Damian and Chris Holden. 2017. IFLA Library Reference Model. [online]. [cited 2019.1.15]. .
  18. RDA Steering Committee. 2019. RDA Toolkit Beta Site. [online]. [cited 2019.4.15]. .
  19. Riva, Pat, Patrick Le Boeuf, and Maja Zumer. 2016. FRBR-Library Reference Model. [online]. [cited 2017.1.15]. .
  20. Riva, Pat, Patrick Le Boeuf, and Maja Zumer. 2017. IFLA Library Reference Model. [online]. [cited 2018.1.10]. .
  21. Walker, Bill. 2018. The IFLA Library Reference. [online]. [cited 2018.1.10]. .
  22. Zumer, Maja and Pat Riva. 2017. IFLA LRM: Finally Here. [online]. [cited 2018.12.15]. .