DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Phenolic plant extracts are additive in their effects against in vitro ruminal methane and ammonia formation

  • Sinz, Susanne ;
  • Marquardt, Svenja ;
  • Soliva, Carla R. ;
  • Braun, Ueli ;
  • Liesegang, Annette ;
  • Kreuzer, Michael
  • Received : 2018.09.05
  • Accepted : 2018.11.29
  • Published : 2019.07.01

Abstract

Objective: The methane mitigating potential of various plant-based polyphenol sources is known, but effects of combinations have rarely been tested. The aim of the present study was to determine whether binary and 3-way combinations of such phenol sources affect ruminal fermentation less, similar or more intensively than separate applications. Methods: The extracts used were from Acacia mearnsii bark (acacia), Vitis vinifera (grape) seed, Camellia sinensis leaves (green tea), Uncaria gambir leaves (gambier), Vaccinium macrocarpon berries (cranberry), Fagopyrum esculentum seed (buckwheat), and Ginkgo biloba leaves (ginkgo). All extracts were tested using the Hohenheim gas test. This was done alone at 5% of dry matter (DM). Acacia was also combined with all other single extracts at 5% of DM each, and with two other phenol sources (all possible combinations) at 2.5%+2.5% of DM. Results: Methane formation was reduced by 7% to 9% by acacia, grape seed and green tea and, in addition, by most extract combinations with acacia. Grape seed and green tea alone and in combination with acacia also reduced methane proportion of total gas to the same degree. The extracts of buckwheat and gingko were poor in phenols and promoted ruminal fermentation. All treatments except green tea alone lowered ammonia concentration by up to 23%, and the binary combinations were more effective as acacia alone. With three extracts, linear effects were found with total gas and methane formation, while with ammonia and other traits linear effects were rare. Conclusion: The study identified methane and ammonia mitigating potential of various phenolic plant extracts and showed a number of additive and some non-linear effects of combinations of extracts. Further studies, especially in live animals, should concentrate on combinations of extracts from grape seed, green tea leaves Land acacia bark and determine the ideal dosages of such combinations for the purpose of methane mitigation.

Keywords

Methane;Plant Extract;Acacia mearnsii;Grape Seed;Green Tea;Uncaria gambir

References

  1. Sinz S, Kunz C, Liesegang A, et al. In vitro bioactivity of various pure flavonoids in ruminal fermentation, with special reference to methane formation. Czech J Anim Sci 2018;63:293-304. https://doi.org/10.17221/118/2017-CJAS
  2. McSweeney CS, Palmer B, McNeill DM, Krause DO. Microbial interactions with tannins: nutritional consequences for ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2001;91:83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00232-2
  3. Dijkstra J, Oenema O, Bannink A. Dietary strategies to reducing N excretion from cattle: implications for methane emissions. Curr Opin Environm Sustain 2011;3:414-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2011.07.008
  4. Cieslak A, Zmora P, Stochmal A, et al. Rumen antimethanogenic effect of Saponaria officinalis L. phytochemicals in vitro. J Agric Sci 2014;152:981-93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859614000239
  5. Staerfl SM, Zeitz JO, Kreuzer M, Soliva CR. Methane conversion rate of bulls fattened on grass or maize silage as compared with the IPCC default values, and the long-term methane mitigation efficiency of adding acacia tannin, garlic, maca and lupine. Agric Ecosyst Environm 2012;148:111-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.003
  6. Hassanat F, Benchaar C. Assessment of the effect of condensed (acacia and quebracho) and hydrolysable (chestnut and valonea) tannins on rumen fermentation and methane production in vitro. J Sci Food Agric 2013;93:332-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5763
  7. Aemiro A, Hanada M, Umetsu K, Nishida T. The effect of Sunphenon 30S-O on methane emission, nutrient intake, digestibility and rumen fermentation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016;214:34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.02.007
  8. Stoldt AK, Derno M, Das G, Weitzel JM, Wolffram S, Metges CC. Effects of rutin and buckwheat seeds on energy metabolism and methane production in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2016;99:2161-8. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10143
  9. Wischer G, Boguhn J, SteingaB H, Schollenberger M, Rodehutscord M. Effects of different tannin-rich extracts and rapeseed tannin monomers on methane formation and microbial protein synthesis in vitro. Animal 2013;7:1796-805. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113001481
  10. Oh S, Shintani R, Koike S, Kobayashi Y. Ginkgo fruit extract as an additive to modify rumen microbiota and fermentation and to mitigate methane production. J Dairy Sci 2017;100:1923-34. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11928
  11. Venter PB, Senekal ND, Kemp G, et al. Analysis of commercial proanthocyanidins. Part 3: The chemical composition of wattle (Acacia mearnsii) bark extract. Phytochemistry 2012;83:153-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.07.012
  12. Shi J, Yu J, Pohorly JE, Kakuda Y. Polyphenolics in grape seeds - biochemistry and functionality. J Med Food 2003;6:291-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/109662003772519831
  13. Graham HN. Green tea composition, consumption, and polyphenol chemistry. Prevent Med 1992;21:334-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(92)90041-F
  14. Kardel M, Taube F, Schulz H, Schutze W, Gierus M. Different approaches to evaluate tannin content and structure of selected plant extracts - Review and new aspects. J Appl Bot Food Qual 2013;86:154-66.
  15. Skrovankova S, Sumczynski D, Mlcek J, Jurikova T, Sochor J. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity in different types of berries. Int J Mol Sci 2015;16:24673-706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms161024673
  16. Soliva CR, Hess HD. Measuring methane emission of ruminants by in vitro and in vivo techniques. In: Makkar HPS, Vercoe PE, editors. Measuring methane production from ruminants. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2007. pp. 15-31.
  17. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). Official methods of analysis. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC International; 1997.
  18. Jayanegara A, Wina E, Soliva CR, Marquardt S, Kreuzer M, Leiber F. Dependence of forage quality and methanogenic potential of tropical plants on their phenolic fractions as determined by principal component analysis. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011;163:231-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.11.009
  19. Asquith TN, Butler LG. Use of dye-labeled protein as spectrophotometric assay for protein precipitants such as tannin. J Chem Ecol 1985;11:1535-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01012199
  20. Alves TP, Dall-Orsoletta AC, Ribeiro-Filho HMN. The effects of supplementing Acacia mearnsii tannin extract on dairy cow dry matter intake, milk production, and methane emission in a tropical pasture. Trop Anim Health Prod 2017;49:1663-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1374-9
  21. Junior FP, Cassiano ECO, Martins MF, et al. Effect of tanninsrich extract from Acacia mearnsii or monensin as feed additives on ruminal fermentation efficiency in cattle. Livest Sci 2017;203:21-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.06.009
  22. Patra AK, Saxena J. Dietary phytochemicals as rumen modifiers: a review of the effects on microbial populations. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2009;96:363-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-009-9364-1
  23. Bento MHL Makkar HPS, Acamovic T. Effect of mimosa tannin and pectin on microbial protein synthesis and gas production during in vitro fermentation of $^{15}N$-labelled maize shoots. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2005;123-124:365-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.022
  24. Pellikaan WF, Stringano E, Leenaars J, et al. Evaluating effects of tannins on extent and rate of in vitro gas and CH4 production using an automated pressure evaluation system (APES). Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011;166-167:377-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.072
  25. Hatew B, Stringano E, Mueller-Harvey I, et al. Impact of variation in structure of condensed tannins from sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) on in vitro ruminal methane production and fermentation characteristics. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2016;100:348-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12336
  26. Jones GA, McAllister TA, Muir AD, Cheng KJ. Effects of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) condensed tannins on growth and proteolysis by four strains of ruminal bacteria. Appl Environm Microbiol 1994;60:1374-8.
  27. Ebert PJ, Bailey EA, Shreck AL, Jennings JS, Cole NA. Effect of condensed tannin extract supplementation on growth performance, nitrogen balance, gas emissions, and energetic losses of beef steers. J Anim Sci 2017;95:1345-55.
  28. Wischer G, Greiling AM, Boguhn J, et al. Effects of long-term supplementation of chestnut and valonea extracts on methane release, digestibility and nitrogen excretion in sheep. Animal 2014;8:938-48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000639
  29. Duval BD, Aguerre M, Wattiaux M, Vadas PA, Powell JM. Potential for reducing on-farm greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from dairy cows with prolonged dietary tannin additions. Water Air Soil Poll 2016;227: 329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-2997-6
  30. Seresinhe T, Perera ANF, Lal PK. In vitro screening of some tropical goat feeds for low methane and high ammonia generating potential in the rumen. Livest Res Rural Dev 2014;26:article 52.
  31. Hess HD, Tiemann TT, Noto F, Franzel S, Lascano CE, Kreuzer M. The effects of cultivation site on forage quality of Calliandra calothyrsus var. Patulul. Agroforestry Syst 2006;68:209-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-006-9010-0

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Swiss National Science Foundation