Habitat selectivity of fresh water fishes of two second-order tropical streams in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia

  • Tesfay, Solomon (Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Mekelle University) ;
  • Teferi, Mekonen (Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Mekelle University) ;
  • Tsegazeabe, Haileselasie Hadush (Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Mekelle University)
  • Received : 2018.06.13
  • Accepted : 2019.03.01
  • Published : 2019.03.31


Background: Habitat selectivity and ecology of freshwater fishes were studied in two selected streams and their junction point which consist a total of 39 microhabitats. The aims of this study were to describe the habitat preference and its availability to fish assemblage, as well as ecology, habitat use, and habitat characteristics. Methods: We collected fish with backpack electrofishing three times during August 2013, December 2013, and March 2014. Using a variation partitioning approach of R software, we studied the relationship of fish abundances with stream type, habitat type, and abundance of key macroinvertebrate taxa. Results: A total of 6554 fishes representing four species belonging to the family Cyprinidae were caught. A higher total fish abundance was recorded from Gereb Tsedo (4870; 74.3%) than from Elala stream (1684; 25.7%). Taking both streams together, the overall total relative fish abundance was significantly higher in pools (53%) than in runs (35%) and in riffles (12%) at P < 0.05. Species-wise comparisons showed that 71%, 15%, 13%, and 1% of the pool fish community were occupied by Garra blanfordii, Garra ignestii, Garra dembecha, and Garra aethiopica, respectively. Stream type, habitat type, and key macroinvertebrate taxa each explained a significant proportion of the variation in fish abundance. Based on the variation partitioning approach, fish abundance was higher in Gereb Tsedo stream (P < 0.01). Moreover, fish abundance increased with pool habitat type (P < 0.01) and with availability of key macroinvertebrate taxa (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Fish abundance differed between stream types, among habitats and among key macroinvertebrate taxa availability. Among the factors, habitat type was the most important driving factor behind variation among fish abundances, and pool supports the highest fish abundance.


  1. APHA. Standard method for the examination of water and waste land. 20th ed. Washington D.C.: Am. Public Health Assoc; 1998. p. 314.
  2. Arunachalam M. Assemblage structure of stream fishes in the Western Ghats (India). Hydrobiologia. 2000;430:1-31.
  3. Baker JA, Ross ST. Spatial and temporal resource utilization by south eastern cyprinids. Copiea. 1981;1981(1):178-89.
  4. Capone TA, Kushlan JA. Fish community structure in dry season stream pools. Ecology. 1991;72:983-92.
  5. Chipps SR, Perry WB, Perry SA. Fish assemblages of the central Appalachian Mountains: an examination of trophic group abundance in nine West Virginia streams. Environ Biol Fish. 1994;40:91-8.
  6. Chuang LC, Lin YS, Liang SH. Ecomorphological comparison and habitat preference of 2 cyprinid fishes, Varicorhinus barbatulus and Candidia barbatus, in Hapen Creek of Northern Taiwan. Zool Stud. 2006;45(1):114-23.
  7. Fame Consortium. Manual for the application of the European fish index-EFI. In:A fish-based method to assess the ecological status of European rivers in support of the Water Framework Directive. Version, 1; 2005.
  8. Finger TR. Fish community-habitat relations in a Central New York stream. J Freshw Ecol. 1982;1:343-52.
  9. Freeman MC, Marcinek PA. Fish assemblage responses to water withdrawals and water supply reservoirs in Piedmont streams. Environ Manag. 2006;38:435-50.
  10. Gerber A, Gabriel MJM. Aquatic Invertebrates of South African Rivers: Field Guide. South Africa: Institute for Water Quality Studies Department of water affairs and Forestry; 2002. p. 1-78.
  11. Getahun, A., 1999: Systematic studies of the African species of the genus Garra (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. The American Museum of Natural History.
  12. Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL. Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. Chichester: Wiley; 1992.
  13. Gorman OT, Karr JR. Habitat structure and stream fish community. Ecology. 1978;59:507-15.
  14. Grenouillet G, Pont D, Seip KL. Abundance and species richness as a function of food resources and vegetation structure: juvenile fish assemblages in rivers. Ecography. 2002;25:641-50.
  15. Harvey BC, Stewart AJ. Fish size and habitat depth relationship in a headwater stream. Oecologia. 1991;87:336-42.
  16. Hawkins CP, Kershner JL, Bisson PA, Bryant MD, Decker LM, Gregory SV, McCullough DA, Overton CK, Reeves GH, Steedman RJ, Young MK. A hierarchical approach to classifying stream habitat features. Fisheries. 1993;18:3-12.<0003:AHATCS>2.0.CO;2
  17. Jayaratne R, Surasinghe T. General ecology and habitat selectivity of fresh water fishes of the Rawan Oya, Kandy, Sri Lanka. Sabaramuwa Univ J. 2010;9(1):11-43.
  18. Jha BR, Waidbacher H, Sharma S, Straif M. Length- weight relationship of sucker head, Garra Gotyla (Gray, 1830) in different rivers of Nepal and the influence of monsoon. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2005;2(2):147-53.
  19. Johal MS, Tandon KK, Tyor AK, Rawal YK. Fish diversity in different habitats in the streams of lower, Middle Western Himalayas. 2002;50(1):45-56.
  20. Johnson JA, Parmar R, Ramesh K, Sen S, Murthy RS. Fish diversity and assemblage structure in Ken River of Panna landscape, central India. J Threatened Taxa. 2012;4(13):3161-72.
  21. Jones NE, Tonn WM, Scrimgeour GJ, Katopodis C. Productive capacity of an artificial stream in the Canadian Arctic: assessing the effectiveness of fish habitat compensation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2003;60:849-63.
  22. Kaiser M, Armstrong J. Fish Habitat Ecology and Conservation. In: Gibson, R. N., and Craig, J. F. (Eds.), The Fisheries Society of the British Isles Annual Symposium, Held in Bangor, UK. Blackwell. 2005;67.
  23. King RP. The biology of Tilapia mariae Bovlenger 1899 (Perciformes: Cichlidae) in a Nigerian Rainforest Stream. In: Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Zoology, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria; 1991.
  24. Kottelat M. Fishes of the Nam Theun and Xe Bangfai basins, Laos, with diagnoses of twenty-two new species (Teleostei: Cyprinidae, Balitoridae, Cobitidae, Coiidae and Odontobutidae). Ichthyological Explor Freshwat. 1998;9(1):1-128.
  25. Kwak TJ, Peterson JT. Community indices, parameters and comparisons. In: Guy CS, Brown ML, editors. Analysis and interpretation of fresh water fisheries data. Bethesda: American fisheries society; 2007. p. 677-763.
  26. Legendre P, Legendre LF. Numerical ecology, vol. 24: Elsevier; 2012.
  27. Leps J, Smilauer P. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO: Cambridge university press; 2003.
  28. Lockwood RN, Schneider JC. Stream fish population estimates by mark andrecapture and depletion methods. In: Schneider JC, editor. Manual of fisheries survey methods II: with periodic updates. Ann Arbor: Michigan Department of Natural Resources, fisheries special report 25; 2000. p. 3-4.
  29. MacNeill DB. Why is fish habitat important. Fish Habitat Factsheet. 2010;1:1-2.
  30. Magurran AE. Ecological diversity and its measurement: Cambridge University Press; 1988. p. 179.
  31. Matthews WJ, Robison HW. Influence of drainage connectivity, drainage area and regional species richness on fishes of the interior highlands in Arkansas. Am Midl Nat. 1998;139:1-19.[0001:IODCDA]2.0.CO;2
  32. Meffe GK, Sheldon AL. The influence of habitat structure on fish assemblage composition in a southeastern black water streams. Amer Midl Nat. 1988;120:225-40.
  33. Mekonen T, Declerck SAJ, De Bie T, Abraha Gebrekidan, Tsehaye Asmelash, Tadesse Dejenie, Bauer HD, Snoeks JA, J. and De Meester L. Ecology of the riverine Garra species (Teleostei, Cypriniformes) in reservoirs of the semi-arid highlands of northern Ethiopia: temporal dynamics of feeding activity. In land waters, 2013;3:331-40.
  34. Mekonen T, Lemmens P, Declerck SAJ, Ruyts S, Gebrekidan A, Asmelash T, Dejenie T, Bauer H, Deckers J, Amare K, Tesfay S, Amare S, Ajuzie CC, Haileselasie TH, Snoeks J, De Meester L. Diet composition of reservoir populations of the riverine fish Garra (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in Ethiopian highlands. J Fish Biol. 2018; in press.
  35. Mendelson J. Feeding relationships among species of Notropis (Pisces:Cyprinidae) in a Wisconsin stream. Ecol Monogr. 1975;45:199-230.
  36. Negi, R. K., Joshi B. D., Negi Tarana, Chand, P. (2007). A study on stream morphology of some selected streams hill streams of district Nainital with special reference to its biotic communities. Proceedings of National Seminar on Limnology at Jiapur, India.
  37. Negi RK, Negi T. Assemblage structure of stream fishes in the Kumaon Himalaya of Uttarakhand State, India. Life Sci J. 2010;7(1):9-14.
  38. Newson MD, Newson CL. Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat:mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges. Prog Phys Geogr. 2000;24(2):195-217.
  39. Oksanen, J. (2005). Vegan: R functions for vegetation ecologists. Available at:
  40. Parasiewicz P. The MesoHABSIM model revisited. River Res Appl. 2007;23(8):893-903.
  41. Peres-Neto PR, Legender P, Dray S, Borcard D. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology. 2006;87:2614-25.[2614:VPOSDM]2.0.CO;2
  42. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2010.
  43. Rainboth, W. J. 1996. Fishes of the Cambodian Mekong. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  44. Rakocinski C. Population structure of stream-dwelling darters: correspondence with habitat structure. Environ Biol Fish. 1988;23(3):215-24.
  45. Reynolds JB. Electrofishing. In: Murphy BR, Willis DW, editors. Fisheries techniques. 2nd ed. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society; 1996. p. 221-53.
  46. Rose DR, Echelle AA. Factor analysis of associations of fishes in Little River, central Texas, with an interdrainage comparison. Am Midl Nat. 1981;106:379-91.
  47. Schlosser IJ. Flow regime, juvenile abundance, and the assemblage structure of stream fishes. Ecology. 1985;66(5):1484-90.
  48. Schlosser IJ. The role of predation in age- and size-related habitat use by stream fishes. Ecology. 1987;68:651-9.
  49. Schlosser IJ, Ebel KK. Effects of flow regime and cyprinid predation on a headwater stream. Ecological Monographs. 1989;(1):41-57.
  50. SFCC. Eletrofishing Team Leader Training Manual. Fisheries Management SVQ Level 3: Managing Electrofishing Operations. Scottish Fisheries Coordination Centre, Pitlochry and Inverness College, Inverness; 2007. p. 3.
  51. Shannon CE, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of information; 1949.
  52. Sovell L, Heiskary S, Anderson J, Sovell L. Using the transparency tube in Minnesota's new Citizen Stream Monitoring Program. In: Proceedings of the 1999 National Water Quality Monitoring Conference; 2000. p. 1-13.
  53. Stiassny MLJ, Getahun A. An overview of labeonin relationships and the phylogenetic placement of the Afro-Asian genus Garra Hamilton, 1922 (Teleostei:Cyprinidae), with the description of five new species of Garra from Ethiopia, and a key to all African species. Zool J Linnean Soc. 2007;150(1):41-83.
  54. Thompson LC, Larsen R. Fish habitat in fresh water stream. FWQP Refe Sheet. 2004;10(3):8112.
  55. Van de Meutter F. Local and regional processes in macroinvertebrate communities in shallow lakes; 2005. p. 152-3.
  56. Van de Meutter F, Stoks R, De Meester L. Metacommunity structure of pond macroinvertebrates: effects of dispersal mode and generation time. Ecology. 2007;88:1687-95.
  57. Ward-Campbell BMS, Beamish FWH, Kongchaiya C. Morphological characteristics in relation to diet in five co-existing Thai fish species. J Fish Biol. 2005;67:1266-79.
  58. Yu SL, Lee TW. Habitat preference of the stream fish, Sinogastromyzon puliensis (Homalopteridae). Zool Stud- Taipei. 2002;41(2):183-7.
  59. Zippin C. The removal method of population estimation. J Wildl Manag. 1958;22:82-90.