Effects of Dietary Microbial-Fermented Molasses on Egg Production and Egg Quality in Laying Hens

미생물 발효 당밀을 산란계 사료에 첨가 시 계란생산성과 특성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • Choi, In Hag (Department of Companion Animal & Animal Resources Science, Joongbu University)
  • 최인학 (중부대학교 애완동물자원학과)
  • Received : 2018.07.15
  • Accepted : 2018.08.13
  • Published : 2019.01.31


This study aimed to evaluate the effects of dietary microbial-fermented molasses on egg production and egg quality in laying hens.In total, 90 Hy-line Brown laying hens were divided into two treatment groups (control and 1% microbial-fermented molasses)with three replicates of 15 birds each. During the experimental period, supplementation of hen diets with 1% microbial-fermented molassesdid not influence egg weight, hen-day egg production, egg mass, and feed conversion ratio (p > 0.05), except for feed intake. Regarding egg quality, diets containing 1% microbial-fermented molasses significantly affected eggshell thickness, Haugh unit, and albumen height (p < 0.05). However, there were no remarkable differences between control and 1% microbial-fermented molasses in eggshell color and egg yolk color (p > 0.05). These results indicate that supplementing 1% microbial-fermented molasses to the diet of laying hens improved egg quality parameters such as eggshell thickness, Haugh unit, and albumen height rather than egg production.


Supported by : 중부대학교


  1. Habibu, B., Ikira, N. M., Buhari, H. U., Aluwong, Y., Kawu, M. U., Yaqub, L. S., Tauheed, M., Isa, H. I., 2014, Effect of molasses supplementation on live weight gain, haematologic parameters and erythrocyte osmotic fragility of broiler chickens in the hot-dry season, Inter .J. Vet. Sci., 3, 181-188.
  2. Hayes, D. J., Jensen, H. H., Fabiosa, J., 2002, Technology choice and the economic effects of a ban on the use of antimicrobial feed additives in swine rations, Food Control., 13, 97-101.
  3. Hussein, A. S., Ayoub, M. A., Elhwetiy, A. Y., Ghurair, J. A., Sulaiman, M., Habib, H. M., 2018, Effect of dietary inclusion of sugar syrup on production performance, egg quality and blood biochemical parameters in laying hens, Anim. Nutri., 4, 59-64.
  4. Huyghebaert, G., Ducatelle, R., Van Immerseel, F., 2011, An update on alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters for broilers, Vet. J., 187, 182-188.
  5. Jang, I. S., 2015, Effects of by-products of herbal medicine on performance, intestinal microbial population, blood biochemical profiles and immunological parameters in broiler chicks, Korean J. Poult. Sci., 42, 307-314.
  6. Lee, C. Y., Lim, J., Ko, Y., Kang, S., Park, M., Ko, T., Lee, J., Hyun, Y., Jeong, K., Jang, I. S., 2011, Intestinal growth and development of weanling pigs in response to dietary supplementation of antibiotics, phytogenic products and brewer's yeast plus Bacillus spores, J Anim Sci and Tech., 53, 227-235.
  7. SAS., 2002, SAS/STAT Software for PC, Release 9.1, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.
  8. USDA., 2000. Egg-grading manual. Washington: Departament of Agriculture. p56. (Agricultural Markenting Service, 75).
  9. Williams, K. C., 1992, Some factors affecting albumen quality with particular reference to Haugh unit score, Poult Sci., 48, 6-16.