DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of the plane of nutrition during the latter grower and entire finisher phases on grow-finish pig performance in summer

  • Yang, Seung Won (Department of Animal Resources Technology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Myeong Hyeon (Department of Animal Resources Technology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Choi, Jung-Seok (Swine Science and Technology Center, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Jin, Sang-Keun (Department of Animal Resources Technology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Park, Man-Jong (Department of Animal Resources Technology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Song, Young-Min (Department of Animal Resources Technology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Chul Young (Department of Animal Resources Technology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2018.11.22
  • 심사 : 2019.01.14
  • 발행 : 2019.01.31

초록

The present study was undertaken to investigate the effects of the plane of nutrition (PN) for growing-finishing pigs on growth performance and meat quality in summer. One hundred and two barrows and 102 gilts weighing approximately 44 kg were placed on a high-, medium-, or low-plane grower diet (HPG, MPG, or LPG) with ME and lysine concentrations ranging from 3.33 to 3.40 Mcal/kg and 0.93% to 1.15%, respectively, for 29 days in 6 replicates (pens) in total. Pigs from each grower pen were divided into two finisher pens and provided with a high-plane finisher diet (HPF) containing 3.40 Mcal ME and 9.5 g lysine/kg and a low-plane finisher diet (LPF; 3.25 Mcal ME and 8 g lysine/kg), respectively, up to approximately 110 kg, and slaughtered. Growth performance of the pigs, including average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and gain:feed ratio, was not influenced by the grower-phase PN during any of the grower phase, a 31-d finisher phase I, and ensuing phase II. However, both the ADG and gain:feed ratio were greater (p < 0.05) for the HPF group than for the LPF group during the finisher phase I (748 vs. 653 g with SEM = 13 g and 0.333 vs. 0.299 with SEM = 0.008, respectively). The ADG, but not gain:feed ratio, was greater for the HPF group vs. LPF during the finisher phase II (673 vs. 623 g with SEM = 15 g for ADG and 0.322 vs. 0.323 with SEM = 0.005 for the gain:feed ratio). The carcass backfat thickness (BFT) was greater for the LPF group vs. HPF within the pigs which had been placed on LPG during the grower phase, but not within the pigs from the HPG or MPG group. Physicochemical characteristics of the longissimus dorsi muscle (LM) and sensory quality attributes of fresh and cooked LM were not influenced by either the grower-phase or finisher-phase PN. In conclusion, high PN is necessary for finishing pigs during the hot season to minimize the reduced rate of weight gain and also to prevent the increase of BFT that could result from low PN.

키워드

Backfat;Growing-finishing pig;Growth;Meat quality;Plane of nutrition;Summer

참고문헌

  1. NRC. Nutrient requirements of swine, 11th ed. Washington, D.C., U.S.A: National Academy Press; 2012.
  2. Noblet J, Van Milgen J. Energy and energy metabolism in swine. In: Chiba LI, editor. Sustainable swine nutrition. Ames, IA, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2013. p. 23-57.
  3. Smith JW, Tokach MD, O'Quinn PR, Nelssen JL, Goodband RD. Effects of dietary energy density and lysine:calorie ratio on growth performance and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 1999;77:3007-15. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.77113007x
  4. Main RG, Dritz SS, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL. Determining an optimum lysine:calorie ratio for barrows and gilts in a commercial finishing facility. J Anim Sci. 2008;86:2190-207. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0408
  5. Beaulieu AD, Williams NH, Patience JF. Response to dietary digestible energy concentration in growing pigs fed cereal grain-based diets. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:965-76. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0834
  6. De La Llata M, Dritz SS, Langemeier MR, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL. Economics of increasing lysine:-calorie ratio and adding dietary fat for growing-finishing pigs reared in a commercial environment. J Swine Health Prod. 2001;9:215-23.
  7. Stahly TS, Cromwell GL. Effect of environmental temperature and dietary fat supplementation on the performance and carcass characteristics of growing and finishing swine. J Anim Sci. 1979;49:1478-88. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1979.4961478x
  8. Hyun Y, Ellis M, Riskowski G, Johnson RW. Growth performance of pigs subjected to multiple concurrent environmental stressors. J Anim Sci. 1998;76:721-27. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.763721x
  9. Le Bellego L, van Milgen J, Noblet J. Effect of high temperature and low-protein diets on the performance of growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2002;80:691-701. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.803691x
  10. Noblet J, Le Dividich J, Van Milgen J. Thermal environment and swine nutrition. In: Lewis AJ, Southern LL, editors. Swine nutrition, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press LLC; 2001. p. 519-44.
  11. Lopez J, Goodband RD, Allee GL, Jesse GW, Nelssen JL, Tokach MD, et al. The effects of diets formulated on an ideal protein basis on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and thermal balance of finishing gilts housed in a hot, diurnal environment. J Anim Sci. 1994;72:367-79. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.722367x
  12. Yang BS, Kim MH, Choi JS, Jin SK, Park MJ, Song YM, et al. Effects of the plane of nutrition for grower pigs on their grow-finish performance and meat quality in winter. J Anim Sci Technol. 2019;61:1-9. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2019.61.1.1
  13. Choi JS, Yang BS, Kim MH, Lee KH, Jung HJ, Jin SK, et al. Effects of the low plane of nutrition on carcass and pork quality of finishing pigs. Ann Anim Resour Sci. 2018;29:172-82. https://doi.org/10.12718/AARS.2018.29.4.172
  14. CIE. Colorimetry, 2nd ed. CIE Publication No. 15.2. Vienna: Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage; 1986.
  15. Lee CY, Lee HP, Jeong JH, Baik KH, Jin SK, Lee JH, et al. Effects of restricted feeding, low-energy diet, and implantation of trenbolone acetate plus estradiol on growth, carcass traits, and circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3 in finishing barrows. J Anim Sci. 2002;80:84-93. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.80184x
  16. Lee CH, Jung DY, Choi JS, Jin SK, Lee CY. Effects of the plane of nutrition on physiochemical characteristics and sensory quality traits of the muscle in finishing pigs. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2014;34:516-24. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.4.516
  17. Jin SK, Kim IS, Hur SJ, Hah KH, Kim BW. Effects of feeding period on carcass and objective meat quality in crossbred longissimus muscle. J Anim Sci Technol. 2004;46:811-20. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2004.46.5.811
  18. Park MJ, Ha DM, Shin HW, Lee SH, Kim WK, Ha SH, et al. Growth efficiency, carcass quality characteristics and profitability of ‘high’-market weight pigs. J Anim Sci Technol. 2007;49:459-70. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2007.49.4.459
  19. Katsumata M, Kaji Y, Saitoh M. Growth and carcass fatness responses of finishing pigs to dietary fat supplementation at a high ambient temperature. Anim Sci. 1996;62:591-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800015149
  20. Nienaber JA, Hahn GL, McDonald TP, Korthals RL. Feeding patterns and swine performance in hot environments. Trans ASAE. 1996;39:195-202. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27498
  21. Quiniou N, Noblet J, van Milgen J, Dubois S. Modelling heat production and energy balance in group-housed growing pigs exposed to low or high ambient temperatures. Br J Nutr. 2001;85:97-106. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN2000217
  22. Fabian J, Chiba LI, Kuhlers DL, Frobish LT, Nadarajah K, Kerth CR, et al. Degree of amino acid restrictions during the grower phase and compensatory growth in pigs selected for lean growth efficiency. J Anim Sci. 2002;80:2610-18.
  23. Millet S, Langendries K, Aluwe M, De Brabander DL. Effect of amino acid level in the pig diet during growing and early finishing on growth response during the late finishing phase of lean meat type gilts. J Sci Food Agric. 2011;91:1254-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4307
  24. Fabian J, Chiba LI, Frobish LT, McElhenney WH, Kuhlers DL, Nadarajah K. Compensatory growth and nitrogen balance in grower-finisher pigs. J Anim Sci. 2004;82:2579-87. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8292579x
  25. Millet S, Aluwe M. Compensatory growth response and carcass quality after a period of lysine restriction in lean meat type barrows. Arch Anim Nutr. 2014;68:16-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2013.869987
  26. De La Llata M, Dritz SS, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL. Effects of increasing lysine to calorie ratio and added fat for growing-finishing pigs reared in a commercial environment: I. growth performance and carcass characteristics. Prof Anim Sci. 2007;23:417-28. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30997-9
  27. Witte DP, Ellis M, McKeith FK, Wilson ER. Effect of dietary lysine level and environmental temperature during the finishing phase on the intramuscular fat content of pork. J Anim Sci. 2000;78:1272-6. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7851272x
  28. Warner RD, Kauffman RG, Greaser ML. Muscle protein changes post mortem in relation to pork quality traits. Meat Sci. 1997;45:339-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00116-7