Response of integral abutment bridges under a sequence of thermal loading and seismic shaking

  • Received : 2018.08.03
  • Accepted : 2018.11.27
  • Published : 2019.01.25


This article investigates the response of Integral Abutment Bridges (IAB) when subjected to a sequence of seasonal thermal loading of the deck followed by ground seismic shaking in the longitudinal direction. Particular emphasis is placed on the effect of pre-seismic thermal Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) on the seismic performance of the IAB, as well as on the ability of various backfills configurations, to minimize the unfavorable SSI effects. A series of two-dimensional numerical analyses were performed for this purpose, on a complete backfill-integral bridge-foundation soil system, subjected to seasonal cyclic thermal loading of the deck, followed by ground seismic shaking, employing ABAQUS. Various backfill configurations were investigated, including conventional dense cohesionless backfills, mechanically stabilized backfills and backfills isolated by means of compressive inclusions. The responses of the investigated configurations, in terms of backfill deformations and earth pressures, and bridge resultants and displacements, were compared with each other, as well as with relevant predictions from analyses, where the pre-seismic thermal SSI effects were neglected. The effects of pre-seismic thermal SSI on the seismic response of the coupled IAB-soil system were more evident in cases of conventional backfills, while they were almost negligible in case of IAB with mechanically stabilized backfills and isolated abutments. Along these lines, reasonable assumptions should be made in the seismic analysis of IAB with conventional sand backfills, to account for pre-seismic thermal SSI effects. On the contrary, the analysis of the SSI effects, caused by thermal and seismic loading, can be disaggregated in cases of IAB with isolated backfills.



  1. ABAQUS (2012), Theory and Analysis User's Manual, Version 6.12, Dassault Systemes SIMULIA, Providence, USA.
  2. Agalianos, A., Sakellariadis, L. and Anastasopoulos, I. (2017), "Simplified method for the assessment of the seismic response of motorway bridges: longitudinal direction-accounting for abutment stoppers", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 15(10), 4133-4162.
  3. Argyroudis, S., Kaynia, A.M. and Pitilakis, K. (2013), "Development of fragility functions for geotechnical constructions: application to cantilever retaining walls", Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 50, 106-116.
  4. Argyroudis, S., Palaiochorinou, A., Mitoulis, S.A. and Pitilakis, D. (2016), "Use of rubberised backfills for improving the seismic response of integral abutment bridges", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 14(12), 3573-3590.
  5. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, A., Lamote, K. and Athanasopoulos, G.A. (2012), "Use of EPS geofoam compressible inclusions for reducing the earthquake effects on yielding earth retaining structures", Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 41, 59-71.
  6. Aviram, A., Mackie, K.R. and Stojadinovic, B. (2008), "Effect of abutment modelling on the seismic response of bridge structures", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 7(4), 395-402.
  7. Baptiste, K.T., Kim, W. and Laman, J.A. (2011), "Parametric study and length limitations for prestressed concrete girder integral abutment bridges", Struct. Eng. Int., 21(2), 151-156.
  8. Bardet, J.B., Ichii, K. and Lin, C.H. (2000), "EERA: a computer program for equivalent-linear earthquake site response analyses of layered soil deposits", Report, Department of Civil Engineering Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  9. Bloodworth, A., Xu, M., Banks, J. and Clayton, C. (2012), "Predicting the earth pressure on integral bridge abutments", J. Bridge Eng., 17(2), 371-381.
  10. Callisto, L. and Soccodato, F.M. (2010), "Seismic design of flexible cantilevered retaining walls", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 136(2), 344-354.
  11. Darendeli, M. (2001), "Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
  12. EN 1991-2 (2003), Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures. Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
  13. EN 1991-5 (2003), Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures. Part 1.5: General Actions-Thermal Actions, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
  14. EN 1997-1 (2004), Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design. Part 1: General Tules, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
  15. EN 1998-1 (2004), Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
  16. EN 1998-2 (2005), Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 2: Bridges, European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium.
  17. EN 1998-5 (2005), Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 5: Foundations, Retaining Structures and Geotechnical Aspects, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
  18. England, G.L. (2005), "A thermal displacement compensation unit for integral bridges", Patents, Bridge Structures, P.N., CA 2605437 A1.
  19. England, G.L. and Tsang, N. (2001), "Towards the design of soil loading for integral bridges-experimental evaluation", Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College, London, UK.
  20. England, G.L., Tsang, N. and Bush, D. (2000) Integral Bridge: A Fundamental Approach to the Time-temperature Loading Problem, Thomas Telford, London, UK.
  21. England, G.L., Tsang, N., Ferreira, P.M.V. and Teixeira, B. (2007)," Some design improvements for integral bridges" Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Current and Future Trends in Bridge Design, Construction and Maintenance, Beijing, China.
  22. Erhan, S. and Dicleli, M. (2015), "Comparative assessment of the seismic performance of integral and conventional bridges with respect to the differences at the abutments", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 13(2), 653-677.
  23. Evangelista, A., di Santolo, A.S. and Simonelli, A.L. (2010), "Evaluation of pseudostatic active earth pressure coefficient of cantilever retaining walls", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 30(11), 1119-1128.
  24. Hashash, Y.M.A. and Park, D. (2002), "Viscous damping formulation and high frequency motion propagation in non-linear site response analysis", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 22(7), 611-624.
  25. Helwany, S. (2007), "Evaluation of bridge approach settlement mitigation methods", Report 07-14, Wisconsin Highway Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA.
  26. Highways Agency (1995), BD 57: Design for Durability, HMSO, London, UK.
  27. Highways Agency (2000), BA 42: The Design of Integral Bridges, HMSO, London, UK.
  28. Highways Agency (2001), DB 37: Loads for Highway Bridges, DMRB 1.3.14, HMSO, London, UK.
  29. Horvath, J. (2010), "Lateral pressure reduction on earth-retaining structures using geofoams: Correcting some misunderstandings" Proceedings of ASCE Earth Retention Conference 3, Bellevue, Washington, August.
  30. Humphrey, D. (2010), "Civil engineering applications using tire derived aggregate (TDA)", Research Report No. DRRR-2011-038, California Waste Management Board, California, USA.
  31. Humphrey, D. and Blumenthal, M. (2011), "The use of tire-derived aggregate in road construction applications" Proceedings of Green Streets & Highways Conference ASCE, Denver, Colorado, November.
  32. IABSE (2011), "Special issue on integral bridges", Struct. Eng. Int., 2.
  33. INTAB (2010), "Economic and durable design of composite bridges with integral abutments", Research Report No. RFSP2-08065, European Commission, Brussels.
  34. Kappos, A.J. and Sextos, A.G., (2009), "Seismic assessment of bridges accounting for nonlinear material and soil response and varying boundary conditions", NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, 3, 195-208.
  35. Kotsoglou, A. and Pantazopoulou, S., (2007), "Bridge-embankment interaction under transverse ground excitation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(12),1719-1740.
  36. Kotsoglou, A. and Pantazopoulou, S., (2009), "Assessment and modelling of embankment participation in the seismic response of integral abutment bridges", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 7, 343-361.
  37. LaFave, J., Riddle, J., Jarrett, M., Wright, B., Svatora, J., An, H. and Fahnestock, L., (2016), "Numerical simulations of steel integral abutment bridges under thermal loading", J. Bridge Eng., doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000919.
  38. Lemnitzer, A., Ahlberg, E., Nigbor, R., Shamsabadi, A., Wallace, J. and Stewart, J. (2009), "Lateral performance of full-scale bridge abutment wall with granular backfill", J. Geotech. Geoenvironm. Eng., 135(4), 506-514.
  39. Lysmer, J. and Kuhlemeyer, R.L. (1969), "Finite dynamic model for infinite media", J. Eng. Mech. Div., 95(4), 859-878.
  40. Mistry, V.C. and Mangus, A. (2006), "Get in, stay in, get out, stay out", Research Report No. FHWA-HRT-2006-001, 70(3), Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, Washington, USA.
  41. Mitoulis, S.A. (2012), "Seismic design of bridges with the participation of seat-type abutments", Eng. Struct., 44, 222-233.
  42. Mitoulis, S.A. and Tegos, I.A., (2011), "Two new earthquake resistant integral abutments for medium to long-span bridges", Struct. Eng. Int., 21(2), 157-161.
  43. Mitoulis, S.A., Palaiochorinou, A., Georgiadis, I. and Argyroudis, S., (2016), "Extending the application of integral frame abutment bridges in earthquake-prone areas by using novel isolators of recycled materials", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 45(14), 2283-2301.
  44. Mitoulis, S.A., Tegos, I.A. and Stylianidis, K.C., (2010), "Cost-effectiveness related to the earthquake resisting system of multi-span bridges", Eng. Struct., 32(9), 2658-2671.
  45. Pistolas, G.A., Tsinaris, A., Anastasiadis, A. and Pitilakis, K. (2014), " Undrained dynamic properties of Hostun sand" Proceedings of 7th Greek Geotechnics Conference, Greece Hellenic Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Athens, November. (in Greek)
  46. Potyondy, J.G. (1961), "Skin friction between various soils and construction materials", Geotechnique, 11(1), 339-353.
  47. Quinn, B.H. and Civjan, S.A. (2016), "Parametric study on effects of pile orientation in integral abutment bridges", J. Bridge Eng., doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000952.
  48. Schanz, T. and Vermeer, P.A. (1996), "Angles of friction and dilatancy of sand", Geotechnique, 46(1), 145-151.
  49. Shamsabadi, A., Rollins, K.M. and Kapuskar, M. (2007), "Nonlinear soil-abutment-bridge structure interaction for seismic performance-based design", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 133(6), 707-720.
  50. Shamsabadi, A., Xu, S.Y. and Taciroglu, E. (2013), "A generalized log-spiral-Rankine limit equilibrium model for seismic earth pressure analysis", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 49, 197-209.
  51. Springman, S.M., Norrish, A. and Ng, C.W.W. (1996), "Cyclic loading of sand behind integral bridge abutments" Research Report No. 146, Transport Research Laboratory, Berkshire, UK.
  52. Tsinidis, G., Pitilakis, K. and Madabhushi, G. (2016b) "On the dynamic response of square tunnels in sand", Eng. Struct., 125, 419-437.
  53. Tsinidis, G., Pitilakis, K., Madabhushi, G. and Heron, C. (2015) "Dynamic response of flexible square tunnels: Centrifuge testing and validation of existing design methodologies", Geotechnique, 65(5), 401-417.
  54. Tsinidis, G., Rovithis, E., Pitilakis, K. and Chazelas, J.L. (2016a), "Seismic response of box-type tunnels in soft soil: Experimental and numerical investigation", Tunn. Undergr. Space Tech., 59, 199-214.
  55. Tubaldi, E., Barbato, M. and DallAsta, A. (2010), "Transverse seismic response of continuous steel-concrete composite bridges exhibiting dual load path", Earthq. Struct., 1(1), 21-41.
  56. Zanini, M.A., Pellegrino, C., Morbin, R. and Modena, C. (2013), "Seismic vulnerability of bridges in transport networks subjected to environmental deterioration", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 11(2), 561-579.
  57. Zhang, J. and Makris, N. (2002), "Seismic response analysis of highway overcrossings including soil-structure interaction", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(11), 1967-1991.