DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reduction of bacterial regrowth in treated water by minimizing water stagnation in the filtrate line of a gravity-driven membrane system

  • Yi, JongChan ;
  • Lee, Jonghun ;
  • Jung, Hyejin ;
  • Park, Pyung-Kyu ;
  • Noh, Soo Hong
  • Received : 2018.01.25
  • Accepted : 2018.05.03
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

This study monitored changes in the level of heterotrophic bacteria in the filtrate and investigated the effect of stagnant water on it, using a batch-operated, gravity-driven membrane system for household water treatment. The filtration test was carried out in the presence and absence of stagnant water in the filtrate line. The results showed that stagnant water accelerated the heterotrophic bacteria levels, measured by heterotrophic plate count, even though the heterotrophic plate count of the filtrate finally increased up to $10^5CFU/mL$ regardless of the presence of stagnant water. When the change in heterotrophic plate count of a batch was monitored over filtration time, heterotrophic plate count of the filtrate rapidly decreased within 5 min for each batch filtration. Biofilm formation on the filtrate line was observed in the presence of stagnant water. The biofilm fully covered the filtrate line and contained numerous microorganisms. During storage after filtration, heterotrophic plate count increased exponentially. To improve the filtrate quality of a filtration-based household water treatment system, therefore, the stagnant water in the filtrate line should be minimized, the filtrate produced at the first 5 min is recommended not to be used as potable water, and the storage of filtrate should be avoided.

Keywords

Bacterial growth;Gravity-driven membrane (GDM);Heterotrophic plate count;Household water treatment (HWT)

References

  1. Szewzyk U, Szewzyk R, Manz W, Schleifer KH. Microbiological safety of drinking water. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2000;54:81-127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.81
  2. Liu G, Lut MC, Verberk JQ, Van Dijk JC. A comparison of additional treatment processes to limit particle accumulation and microbial growth during drinking water distribution. Water Res. 2013;47:2719-2728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.035
  3. Ho L, Braun K, Fabris R, et al. Comparison of drinking water treatment process streams for optimal bacteriological water quality. Water Res. 2012;46:3934-3942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.041
  4. Sobsey MD, Stauber CE, Casanova LM, Brown JM, Elliott MA. Point of use household drinking water filtration: A practical, effective solution for providing sustained access to safe drinking water in the developing world. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:4261-4267. https://doi.org/10.1021/es702746n
  5. Rosa G, Clasen T. Estimating the scope of household water treatment in low- and medium-income countries. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2010;82:289-300. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0382
  6. Clasen T, Boisson S. Household-based ceramic water filters for the treatment of drinking water in disaster response: An assessment of a pilot programme in the Dominican Republic. Water Pract. Technol. 2006;1.
  7. Perez-Vidal A, Diaz-Gomez J, Castellanos-Rozo J, Usaquen-Perilla OL. Long-term evaluation of the performance of four point-of-use water filters. Water Res. 2016;98:176-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.04.016
  8. Wolf J, Pruss-Ustun A, Cumming O, et al. Assessing the impact of drinking water and sanitation on diarrhoeal disease in low- and middle-income settings: Systematic review and meta-regression. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2014;19:928-942. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12331
  9. Rufener S, Mausezahl D, Mosler HJ, Weingartner R. Quality of drinking-water at source and point-of-consumption - Drinking cup as a high potential recontamination risk: A field study in Bolivia. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2010;28:34-41.
  10. Van Halem D, Van der Laan H, Heijman SGJ, Van Dijk JC, Amy GL. Assessing the sustainability of the silver-impregnated ceramic pot filter for low-cost household drinking water treatment. Phys. Chem. Earth 2009;34:36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2008.01.005
  11. Thomas EA, Zumr Z, Graf J, et al. Remotely accessible instrumented monitoring of global development programs: Technology development and validation. Sustainability 2013;5:3288-3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083288
  12. World Health Organization. Results of round I of the WHO International Scheme to evaluate household water treatment technologies. WHO; 2016.
  13. Peter M. Gravity-driven membrane disinfection for household water treatment. Eawag; 2015.
  14. Eawag. Evaluating the "Safir" gravity-driven membrane filter in Bolivia. Eawag: Sandec News; 2014. p. 21.
  15. World Health Organization. Heterotrophic plate counts and drinking-water safety. IWA Publishing; 2003.
  16. World Health Organization. Heterotrophic plate count meas urement in drinking water safety management. World Health Organization; 2002.
  17. Chowdhury S. Heterotrophic bacteria in drinking water distribution system: A review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012;184:6087-6137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2407-x
  18. Yi JC, Lee JH, Noh SH. Cleaning effects induced by feed water flow of a gravity-driven membrane module. J. Appropriate Technol. 2016;2:47-54.
  19. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Membrane filtration guidance manual. EPA; 2005.
  20. Lautenschlager K, Boon N, Wang Y, Egli T, Hammes F. Overnight stagnation of drinking water in household taps induces microbial growth and changes in community composition. Water Res. 2010;44:4868-4877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.032
  21. Escobar IC, Randall AA, Taylor JS. Bacterial growth in distribution systems: Effect of assimilable organic carbon and biodegradable dissolved organic carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001;35:3442-3447. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0106669
  22. Huck PM. Measurement of biodegradable organic matter and bacterial growth potential in drinking water. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1990;82:78-86.
  23. Volk CJ, Lechevallier MW. Impacts of the reduction of nutrient levels on bacterial water quality in distribution systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999;65:4957-4966.
  24. Van der Kooij D, Veenendaal HR, Baars-Lorist C, Van der Klift DW, Drost YC. Biofilm formation on surfaces of glass and Teflon exposed to treated water. Water Res. 1995;29:1655-1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(94)00333-3
  25. Mi Z, Dai Y, Xie S, Chen C, Zhang X. Impact of disinfection on drinking water biofilm bacterial community. J. Environ. Sci. 2015;37:200-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.04.008
  26. Camper AK, McFeters GA, Characklis WG, Jones WL. Growth kinetics of coliform bacteria under conditions relevant to drinking water distribution systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991;57:2233-2239.
  27. Miettinen IT, Vartiainen T, Martikainen PJ. Phosphorus and bacterial growth in drinking water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997;63:3242-3245.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)