Investigating factors influencing Educational Performanceand mediating effects of learning presence of University Flipped Learning Classroom

대학 플립드러닝에서 수업성과에 영향을 미치는 요인과 학습실재감의 매개효과 규명

  • Jeon, JeongA (Educational Technology, Graduate School of Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Lee, Jeongmin (Educational Technology, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Bae, Yunju (Educational Technology.HRD, Ewha Womans University)
  • 전정아 (이화여자대학교 대학원 교육공학과) ;
  • 이정민 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과) ;
  • 배윤주 (이화여자대학교 교육대학원 교육공학.HRD)
  • Received : 2019.10.14
  • Accepted : 2019.12.20
  • Published : 2019.12.28


The purpose of this study is to investigate factors influencing educational performance and mediating effects of learning presence in the university flipped learning classroom. For achieving this purpose, self-regulation, learning presence, and collaborative preference were selected as learner variables, and perceived academic achievement and learning engagement were selected as variables for educational performance. To investigate causal relationships among the variables, 39 university students who took 16 week course flipped-learning class participated self-reported survey. Collected data were analyzed by multiple regression and mediation analyses. The results were as follows: first, learning presence and self-regulation affected learning engagement, and moreover, the learning presence mediated between self-regulation and learning engagement. Second, only learning presence affected perceived academic achievement. Therefore, various strategies for effective flipped learning should be considered, and well-designed classroom activities that can promote learners self-regulation, learning presence, and learning engagement are needed to successful flipped learning.


  1. J. Bergmann & A. Sams. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education. Wasington DC: 2012 International Society for Technology in Education.
  2. M. S. Kang. (2015). A Case Study on Engineering Experiment Lesson Using on-line pre-Learning for Improvement of Self-regulated Learning Ability. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 18(5), 59-66. DOI : 10.18108/jeer.2015.18.5.59
  3. Y. Y. Kim & H. M. Chung. (2017). Design and Effects of A Flipped Learning Applying the First Principles of Instruction. Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 295-326. DOI : 10.17232/kset.33.2.295
  4. K. H. Lee, J. S. Jun & K. W. Ryu. (2017). Effect of Three Types of Flipped Learning Classes on the Improvement of Academic Achievement and Class Satisfaction of College Students. Global Creative Leader, 7, 1-22. DOI : 10.34226/gcl.2017.7.1.1
  5. J. Y. Jung. (2017). The Effect of the Flipped Learning on Self-directed and Self-regulation Competence of Pre-teacher Students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(4), 215-235. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.4.215
  6. K. C. Hong & J. Y. Kim. (2017). The Effect of Flipped Learning on Self-Directed Learning Ability and Learning Motivation. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 70, 205-232. DOI : 10.17253/swueri.2017.70..008
  7. E. J. Kim (2018). Examining Structural Relationships among Factors Affecting Learning Engagement and Outcomes in Flipped-Learning College Classrooms. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18, 451-469. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.2.451
  8. J. M. Lee, Y. J. Jung, H. K. Park, & B. R. Cho (2016). Effects of Academic Emotion Regulation and Group Cohesiveness on Learning Satisfaction and Learning Interest in the University Flipped Learning. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 20(4), 341-356. DOI : 10.14352/jkaie.2016.20.4.341
  9. H. H. Jeong (2018). Exploring Structural Relationships among Factors Affecting Satisfaction of Flipped Learning Applied to Instruction in College. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 24(4), 833-864. DOI :
  10. J. S. Hahn & J. H. Kim (2018). A Structural Relationship between Undergraduates' Academic Self-efficacy, Teaching Presence and Perceived Achievement in Flipped Learning. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 24(1), 177-199. DOI :
  11. J. M. Lee, J. Y. Noh, & Y. H. Chung (2016). Investigating Factors Affecting Flipped Learning Outcomes. Journal of The Korea Association of Information Education, 20(1), 57-68. DOI :
  12. M. H. Kang, J. Y. Jung, M. S. Park, & H. J. Park, (2009). Impact of learning presence on learner interaction and outcome in web-based project learning. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning-Volume 2 (pp. 62-64). International Society of the Learning Sciences. DOI :
  13. M. H. Kang, N. Y. Kim, M. J. Kim, J. Y. Kim, H. J. Lim (2011). A Structural Relationship among Teaching Presence, Learning Presence and Learning Outcomes of e-Learning in Cyber University. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 17(2), 153-176.
  14. H. J. Park & B. M. Yu (2014). An Analysis of the Structural Relationships among Learning Presence, Learning Flow, Learning Satisfaction and Learning Persistence with the Use of SNS in University Classes. The Journal of Educational Information and Medi, 20(4), 649-674. DOI :
  15. He, Y. C. (2009). Self-determination among adult Chinese English language learners: The relationship among perceived autonomy support, intrinsic motivation, and engagement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, America.
  16. N. S. Seo, S. J. Woo, & Y. J. Ha. (2015). The Effects of Self-directed Learning Ability and Motivation on Learning Satisfaction of Nursing Students in Convergence Blended Learning Environment, Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(9), 11-19.
  17. KIRD. (2018). KIRD. Flipped Learning. https://bl
  18. Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), 1-16. DOI :
  19. Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British journal of educational technology, 43(2), 191-204. DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
  20. S. Y. Kim, M. J. Kang, & S. H. Yoon (2017). The predictability of academic self-regulation, self-determination, and flow on the satisfaction of flipped learning in university. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17, 91-109. DOI :
  21. S. W. Kim & K. Y. Lim (2016). Relationships among Self-Regulation, Teaching Presence, Perceived Interaction, and Learning Outcomes in a Flipped Learning Environment: Mediating Effects of Perceived Interaction. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 28, 743-766. DOI :
  22. M. J. Kang, J. Kim, & M. Park (2008). Investigating Presence as a Predictor of Learning Outcomes in E-learning Environment. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 4175-4180). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 23, 2019 from
  23. M. Y. Doo, H. L. Kwon, E. Y Moon (2017). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Presence on Learning Performance in Online Learning Environment. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 29, 185-210. DOI :
  24. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250. DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
  25. Y. J. Joo, E. K. Kim, S. Y. Park, (2009). The Structural Relationship among Cognitive Presence, Flow and Learning Outcome in Corporate Cyber Education. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 15 (3), 21-38.
  26. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 2 (2). 87-105.
  27. S. A. Lee, H. M. Lee, & U. Y. Um (2017). Differences in Learning Satisfaction and Academic Achievement According to Elementary School Students' Learning Experience, Learning Style, and Perceived Reality in Flip Learning Environment: Elementary School Mathematics. Proceedings of Educational Technology Conference, 2017(1), 34-34.
  28. K. Y. Lim, M. H. Jin, S. W. Kim, I. H. Jo (2016). Relationships among self-determination, collaboration preference, cognitive presence and perceived achievement in flipped learning environment. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 22(3), 439-462. DOI :
  29. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1991). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (Vol. 4). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  30. Yazici, J. H. (2005). A study of collaborative learning style and team learning performance. Education+ training, 47(3), 216-229. DOI :
  31. M. H. Kang, M. J. Kim, H. J. Kim, S. Y. Um, H. Y. Jeong (2010). Investigating the relationship among students' collaboration preference, self-efficacy, interaction, and achievement in the web-based collaborative learning. Korean Journal of Educational Research. 48, 157-180.
  32. M. M. Bong, S. I, Kim, J. Reeve, H. J. Lim, W. K. Lee, J. Yi, J. H. Kim, H. J. Kim, A. R. Noh, U. K. Noh, S. H. Beak, J. Y. Song, J. Y. Shin, H. S. Ann, Y. K. Woo, S. J. Won, K. H. Lee, M. H. Lee, S. K. Lee, S. Y. Lee, J. S. Lee, K. Y. Jeong, C. Cho, A. R. Hwang (2012). SMILES: Student Motivation in the Learning Environment Scales. From ales/list.html?id=assessment.
  33. B. J. Gorvine & H. D. Smith. (2015). Predicting student success in a psychological statistics course emphasizing collaborative learning. Teaching of Psychology, 42(1), 56-59. DOI :
  34. I. W. Park, J. I. Choi & J. K. Choi (2004). Participant Learner for Cooperative Learning. Seoul: Academypress.
  35. M. S. Kang & K. Lim (2013). Structural Analyses on the Effects of Self-regulated Learning and Learning Motivation on Learner-instructor Interactions and Academic Performance in College Learning Environments with e-Learning Contents. Journal of The Korea Contents Association, 13(11), 1014-1023. DOI : 10.5392/jkca.2013.13.11.1014
  36. S. B. Eom, H. J. Wen & N. Ashill. (2006). The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235. DOI : 10.1111/dsji.12097
  37. J. W. Yu & M. H. Kang. (2012). The Structural Relationship among Learning Environment Factors, Individual Factors, and Learning Engagement. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 12, 309-337.
  38. Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & education, 50(4), 1183-1202. DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
  39. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator- mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. DOI :
  40. EDUCAUSE (2012). Things you should know about flipped classrooms.
  41. Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & education, 50(4), 1183-1202. DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
  42. Kim, D. (2018). Study on Flipped Learning and Flipped PBL Effectiveness of College General Mathematics. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(6), 209-215.
  43. H. Kim & D. Park. (2019). Effects of Convergence Education by Jigsaw Model and Flipped Learning in Nursing Students. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology 9(3), 36-43.