DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of gas composition on dispersion characteristics of blowout gas on offshore platform

  • Yang, Dongdong (Centre for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China)) ;
  • Chen, Guoming (Centre for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China)) ;
  • Shi, Jihao (Centre for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China)) ;
  • Li, Xinhong (Centre for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China))
  • Received : 2018.07.20
  • Accepted : 2019.02.19
  • Published : 2019.02.18

Abstract

Gas composition has a significant impact on the dispersion behavior and accumulation characteristics of blowout gas. However, few public studies has investigated the corresponding effect of gas composition. Therefore, this study firstly builds the FLACS-based numerical model about an offshore drilling platform. Then several scenarios by varying the composition of blowout gas are simulated while the scenario with the composition of "Deepwater Horizon" accident is regarded as the benchmark. Furthermore, the effects of the gas composition on the flammable cloud volume, the influenced area of flammable cloud, the influenced area of hydrogen sulfide and the critical time of the hydrogen sulfide spreading to the living area are analyzed. The results demonstrate that gas composition is a driving factor for dispersion characteristics of blowout gas. All the results can give support to reduce the risk of the similar accidents incurred by real blowouts.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : China University of Petroleum

References

  1. Bleyer, A., Taveau, J., Djebaili-Chaumeix, N., Paillard, C.E., Bentaib, A., 2012. Comparison between FLACS explosion simulations and experiments conducted in a PWR Steam Generator casemate scale down with hydrogen gradients. Nucl. Eng. Des. 245 (3), 189-196.
  2. BP, 2010. Deepwater Horizon Accident Investigation Report. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/DeepwaterHorizonAccidentInvestigationReportExecutive summary.pdf.
  3. Dadashzadeh, M., Abbassi, R., Khan, F., Hawboldt, K., 2013. Explosion modeling and analysis of BP Deepwater Horizon accident. Saf. Sci. 57 (8), 150-160.
  4. Dandrieux, A., Dusserre, G., Ollivier, J., 2002. Small scale field experiments of chlorine dispersion. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 15 (1), 5-10.
  5. Deng, H., Chen, G., Zhu, Y., Fu, J., Liu, D., 2012. Simulation and experiment of gas leakage and dispersion in complex topography. J. China Univ. Petrol. 36 (1), 122-126.
  6. Fu, J., Zhao, Z., Chen, G., Luo, H., Zhang, B., Zhang, B., Ye, C., Zhu, Y., 2016. Influences of liquid pipeline flow and pressure on small-hole leakage rate. Acta Pet. Sin. 37 (02), 257-265.
  7. GexCon, 2015. FLACS v10.4 User's Manual, Norway.
  8. Gupta, S., Chan, S., 2016. A CFD based explosion risk analysis methodology using time varying release rates in dispersion simulations. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 39, 59-67.
  9. Hanna, S.R., Drivas, P.J., 1996. Guidelines for Use of Vapor Cloud Dispersion Models, second ed. Center for Chemical Process Safety, AIChE, New York.
  10. Hansen, O.R., Gavelli, F., Ichard, M., Davis, S.G., 2010. Validation of FLACS against experimental data sets from the model evaluation database for LNG vapor dispersion. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 23 (6), 857-877.
  11. Hansen, O.R., Gavelli, F., Davis, S.G., Middha, P., 2013. Equivalent cloud methods used for explosion risk and consequence studies. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 26 (3), 511-527.
  12. Huang, Y., Ma, G., Li, J., 2017. Multi-level explosion risk analysis (MLERA) for accidental gas explosion events in super-large FLNG facilities. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 45, 242-254.
  13. Huser, A., Kvernvold, O., 2001. Explosion risk analysis - development of a general method for gas dispersion analyses on offshore platforms. In: Parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics, pp. 517-524.
  14. vanWingerden, Kees, Salaun, Nicolas, 2016. LNG-engine safety: design of protective measures using CFD. Chem. Eng. Trans. 48, 31-36.
  15. Li, J., Madhat, Abdel-jawad, Ma, G., 2014. New correlation for vapor cloud explosion overpressure calculation at congested configurations. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 31, 16-25.
  16. Li, X., Chen, G., Meng, H., Zhu, Y., Shi, J., 2015. Diffusion characteristics of blowout combustible gas in semi-submersible drilling platform in South China Sea. China Offshore Oil Gas 27 (01), 111-115+120.
  17. Li, J., Ma, G., Abdel-Jawad, M., Huang, Y., 2016a. Gas dispersion risk analysis of safety gap effect on the innovating FLNG vessel with a cylindrical platform. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 40, 304-316.
  18. Li, X., Zhou, R., Konovessis, D., 2016b. CFD analysis of natural gas dispersion in engine room space based on multi-factor coupling. Ocean Eng. 111, 524-532.
  19. Li, J., Ma, G., Hao, H., Huang, Y., 2017. Optimal blast wall layout design to mitigate gas dispersion and explosion on a cylindrical FLNG platform. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 49, 481-492.
  20. Li, X., Chen, G., Zhu, H., Xu, C., 2018. Gas dispersion and deflagration above sea from subsea release and its impact on offshore platform. Ocean Eng. 163, 157-168.
  21. Liu, D., Wei, J., 2017. Modelling and simulation of continuous dense gas leakage for emergency response application. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 48, 14-20.
  22. Liu, K., Chen, G., Wei, C., 2015. Combustible gas diffusion law and hazardous area of FPSO. Acta Pet. Sin. 36 (8), 1018-1028.
  23. Middha, P., Hansen, O.R., Storvik, I.E., 2009. Validation of CFD-model for hydrogen dispersion. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 22 (6), 1034-1038.
  24. Qi, X., Wang, H., Song, X., Chen, G., 2017. Threshold of equivalent gas cloud size based on explosion load of control room. CIE J. 68 (12), 4857-4864.
  25. Qiao, A., Zhang, S., 2010. Advanced CFD modeling on vapor dispersion and vapor cloud explosion. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 23 (6), 843-848.
  26. Savvides, C., Tam, V., Kinnear, D., 2001. Dispersion of fuel in offshore modules: comparison of predictions using FLACS and full-scale experiments. In: Proceedings of Major Hazards Offshore Conference. London. ERA Technology Ltd.
  27. Shi, J., Khan, F., Zhu, Y., Li, J., Chen, G., 2018a. Robust data-driven model to study dispersion of vapor cloud in offshore facility. Ocean Eng. 98-110.
  28. Shi, J., Li, J., Zhu, Y., Hao, H., Chen, G., Xie, B., 2018b. A simplified statistic-based procedure for gas dispersion prediction of fixed offshore platform. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 114, 48-63.
  29. Tauseef, S.M., Rashtchian, D., Abase, S.A., 2011. CFD-based simulation of dense gas dispersion in presence of obstacles. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 24 (4), 371-376.
  30. Yang, D., Chen, G., Shi, J., 2017. Research on dangerous region of H2S-containing natural gas diffusion resulting from offshore platform blowout. J. Saf. Sci. Technol. 13 (08), 114-120.
  31. Zhang, J., Lei, D., Feng, W., 2011. Analysis of chemical disasters caused by release of hydrogen sulfide-bearing natural gas. Procedia Eng. 26, 1878-1890.
  32. Zhang, J., Lei, D., Feng, W., 2014. An approach for estimating toxic releases of H2S-containing natural gas. J. Hazard Mater. 264, 350-362.
  33. Zhu, Y., Chen, G., 2009. Analysis of H2 S dispersion in the congested working environments of offshore platform. J. Saf. Environ. 9 (6), 140-143.